Investigating patients' preferences for cardiac rehabilitation in Denmark

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 211-218

  Kjær, Trine ^a   Gyrd Hansen, Dorte ^a   Willaing, Ingrid ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b Research Centre for Prevention and Health   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Decision support techniques; Heart diseases; Patient satisfaction; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HEART DISEASES; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

CARDIOLOGY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DISEASES; HEALTH CARE; HOSPITALS; PATIENT MONITORING;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CARDIAC PATIENT; COUNSELING; DENMARK; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEART DISEASE; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; MALE; NURSE; NUTRITIONAL COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT GUIDANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING CESSATION;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COUNSELING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DENMARK; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SEX FACTORS; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 33645754260     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462306051038     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, et al. Economic evaluation with stated preference techniques, a manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited; 2002.
2. Bech M. Politicians' and hospital managers' trade-offs in the choice of reimbursement scheme: A discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2003;66:261-275.
3. Beswick AD, Rees K, Griebsch I, et al. Provision, uptake and cost of cardiac rehabilitation programs: Improving services to under-represented groups. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1-152.
4. Birch S, Donaldson C. Valuing the benefits and costs of health care programs: Where's the 'extra' in extra-welfarism? Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:1121-1123.
5. Clark AM, Barbour RS, White M, MacIntyre PD. Promoting participation in cardiac rehabilitation: Patient choices and experiences. J Adv Nurs. 2004;47:5-14.
6. Cooper AF, Jackson G, Weinman J, Horne R. A qualitative study investigating patients' beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:87-96.
7. Filip J, McGillen C, Mosca L. Patient preferences for cardiac rehabilitation and desired program elements. J Cardiopum Rehabil. 1999;19:339-343.
8. Gerard K, Lattimer V. Preferences of patients for emergency services available during usual GP surgery hours: A discrete choice experiment. Fam Pract. 2005;22:28-36.
9. Greene WH. Econometric analysis. New Jersey: Person Education, Inc; 2003.
10. Gyrd-Hansen D, Slothuus U. The citizen's preferences for financing public health care: A Danish survey. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2002;2:25-36.
11. Hanemann WM. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am J Agric Econ. 1984;66:332-341.
12. Hedback B, Perk J, Hornblad M, Ohlsson U. Cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass surgery: 10-year results on mortality, morbidity and readmissions to hospital. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2001;8:153-158.
13. Jackson L, Leclerc J, Erskine Y, Linden W. Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: A review of referral and adherence predictors. Heart. 2005;91:10-14.
14. Kuhfeld WF. Marketing research methods in SAS experimental design, choice, conjoint, and graphical techniques. Cary: SAS Institute Inc; 2003.
15. Lavorato L, Grypma S, Spenceley S, Hagen B, Nowatzki N. Positive outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation: The little program that could. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003;13:13-19.
16. Lloyd-Williams F, Mair FS, Leitner M. Exercise training and heart failure: A systematic review of current evidence. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:47-55.
17. Louviere J, Hensher DA, Swait J. Stated choice methods, analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
18. Louviere JJ. Choice experiments: An overview of concepts and issues. In: Bennett, Blamey R, eds. The choice modeling approach to environmental valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited; 2001;13-36.
19. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers of econometrics. London: Academic Press; 1974:105-142.
20. Moore SM, Kramer FM. Women's and men's preferences for cardiac rehabilitation program features. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1996;16:163-168.
21. Oldridge NB, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. Economic evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation soon after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 993;72:154-161.
22. Oldridge NB. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation: Is it cost-effective?Eur Heart J. 1998;19(Suppl 0):42-50.
23. Plach SK. Women and cardiac rehabilitation after heart surgery: Patterns of referral and adherence. Rehabil Nurs. 2003;27:104-109.
24. Rees K, Bennett P, West R, Davey SG, Ebrahim S. Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;CD002902.
25. Ryan M , Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programs: Current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2:55-64.
26. Sanderson BK, Phillips MM, Gerald L, DiLillo V, Bittner V. Factors associated with the failure of patients to complete cardiac rehabilitation for medical and nonmedical reasons. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003;23:281-289.
27. Sculpher M, Bryan S, Fry P, et al. Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: Discrete choice experiment. BMJ. 2004;328:382.
28. Schwappach DL. Does it matter who you are or what you gain? An experimental study of preferences for resource allocation. Health Econ. 2003;12:255-267.
29. Scott A, Watson MS, Ross S. Eliciting preferences of the community for out of hours care provided by general practitioners: A stated preference discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:803-814.
30. Stewart KJ, Badenhop D, Brubaker PH, et al. Cardiac Rehabilitation following percutaneous revascularization, heart transplant, heart valve surgery, and for chronic heart failure. Chest. 2003;123:2104-2111.
31. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116:682-692.
32. Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev. 1927;34:273-286.
33. Varian HR. Microeconomic analysis. New York: Norton; 1992.
34. Weston A, Fitzgerald P. Discrete choice experiment to derive willingness to pay for methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy versus simple excision surgery in basal cell carcinoma. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:1195-208.
35. Willaing I, Andreassen AH, Jørgensen T, Rokkedal J. Comparison of three hospital-based rehabilitation programs for patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004;11:258.
36. Yu CM, Lau CP, Chau J, et al. A short course of cardiac rehabilitation program is highly cost effective in improving long-term quality of life in patients with recent myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1915-1922.