The signs of the times: Imposing a globally signed condition on willingness to pay distributions

Transportation

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 205-222

  Hensher, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Mixed logit; Random parameter distributions; Willingness to pay distributions

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ESTIMATION; RANDOM PROCESSES; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

CAR COMMUTERS; MIXED LOGIT; RANDOM PARAMETER DISTRIBUTIONS; TRAVEL TIME PARAMETERISATION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY DISTRIBUTIONS;

TRANSPORTATION;

LOGIT ANALYSIS; TRAVEL TIME; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 33645766233     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-005-2302-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. P Armstrong R Garrido Ortuzar J de Dios 2001 Confidence intervals to bound the value of time Transportation Research 37E 143-161
2. ME Ben-Akiva D Bolduc M Bradley 1993 Estimation of travel choice models with randomly distributed values of time Transportation Research Record 1413 88-97
3. Ben-Akiva M, Bolduc D & Walker J (2001) Specification, identification and estimation of the logit kernel (or continuous mixed logit) model. MIT Working paper, Department of Civil Engineering
4. CR Bhat 1998 Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service variables in travel mode choice modeling Transportation Research 32A 7 495-507
5. CR Bhat 2000 Incorporating observed and unobserved heterogeneity in urban work mode choice modeling Transportation Science 34 2 228-238 10.1287/trsc.34.2.228.12306
6. D Brownstone K Train 1999 Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns Journal of Econometrics 89 109-129
7. Fosgerau M (2004) Investigating the distribution of the value of travel time savings. Danish Transport Research Institute, Copenhagen, November
8. Greene WH & Hensher DA (2004) Generalised mixed logit: Separating out heterogeneity revealed through random parameters and heterogeneity through latent kernel effects. Stern School of Business, New York University
9. WH Greene DA Hensher J Rose 2005 Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models Transportation Research B 40 1 75-92
10. R Haaijer W Kamakura M Wedel 2000 Response latencies in conjoint choice experiments Journal of Marketing Research 37 3 376-382 10.1509/ jmkr.37.3.376.18775
11. Hensher DA (2001) The valuation of travel time savings for car drivers: Establishing a distribution for Sydney for commuting and non-commuting travel. Report prepared for Transfield Project Development Sydney, April
12. Hensher DA (2005a) Revealing differences in behavioral response due to the dimensionality of stated choice designs: An initial assessment, Environment and Resource Economics
13. Hensher DA (2005b) How do respondents handle stated choice experiments? - Attribute processing strategies under varying information load. Journal of Applied Econometrics
14. Hensher DA (2005) Reducing sign violation for VTTS distributions through recognition of an individual's attribute processing strategy. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, the University of Sydney (September)
15. DA Hensher PB Goodwin 2004 Implementation of values of time savings: The extended set of considerations in a tollroad context Transport Policy 11 2 171-181 10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.10.002
16. DA Hensher WH Greene 2003 Mixed logit models: The state of practice Transportation 30 2 133-176 10.1023/A:1022558715350
17. DA Hensher J Rose WH Greene 2005 Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer Cambridge University Press Cambridge
18. S Hess M Bierlaire J Polak 2005a Estimation of value of travel-time savings using mixed logit models Transportation Research A 2 3 221-237
19. Hess S, Axhausen K & Polak J (2005b) Distributional assumptions in mixed logit models, August (mimeo)
20. Huber J & Train K (2001) On the similarity of classical and Bayesian estimates of individual mean partworths. Marketing Letters (Aug. 12): 259-270.
21. Meijer E & Rouwendal J (2000) Measuring welfare effects in models with random coefficients. Department of Econometrics, University of Grongingen, July
22. A Papoulis 1984 Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes 2 McGraw-Hill New York 104-148
23. Revelt D & Train K (2000) Customer-specific taste parameters and mixed logit. Working paper. Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. http://elsa.berkeley.edu/wp/train0999.pdf
24. D Revelt K Train 1998 Mixed logit with repeated choices: Households' choices of appliance efficiency level Review of Economics and Statistics LXXX 40 647-657
25. Rigby D. & Burton M (2004) Modelling indifference and dislike: A bounded Bayesian mixed logit model of the UK market for GM food. Paper presented at Agricultural Economics Society 78th Annual Conference, Imperial College, London, 2-4 April
26. M Sillano J Dios Ortuzar de 2005 Willingness-to-pay estimation with mixed logit models: Some new evidence Environment and Planning A 37 525-550 10.1068/a36137
27. Small K, Winston C & Yan J (2002) Uncovering the distribution of motorists' preferences for travel time and reliability: Implications for road pricing. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine
28. Train K & Sonnier G (2002) Mixed logit with bounded distributions of part worths
29. K Train 2003 Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation Cambridge University Press Cambridge
30. Weisstein E W. Rayleigh Distribution in MathWorld - A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RayleighDistribution.html