The Laminin 511/521-binding site on the Lutheran blood group glycoprotein is located at the flexible junction of Ig domains 2 and 3

Blood

Volumn 110, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 3398-3406

  Mankelow, Tosti J ^a,g   Burton, Nicholas ^b   Stefansdottir, Fanney O ^a   Spring, Frances A ^a   Parsons, Stephen F ^a   Pedersen, Jan S ^c   Oliveira, Cristiano L P ^c   Lammie, Donna ^d   Wess, Timothy ^d   Mohandas, Narla ^e   Chasis, Joel Anne ^f   Brady, R Leo ^b   Anstee, David J ^a  

^a NHS BLOOD AND TRANSPLANT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^d CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER   (United States)

^f LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^g BITS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOGLOBULIN G; LAMININ 10; SCLEROPROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BLOOD GROUP LUTHERAN SYSTEM; CELL MEMBRANE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MUTAGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RECEPTOR BINDING; SICKLE CELL ANEMIA; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

EID: 36148955798     PISSN: 00064971     EISSN: 00064971     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-094748     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Parsons SF, Mallinson G, Holmes CH, et al. The Lutheran blood group glycoprotein, another member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, is widely expressed in human tissues and is developmentally regulated in human liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:5496-5500.
2. b blood group antigen is located on red cell membrane glycoproteins of 85 and 78 kd. Transfusion. 1987;27:61-63.
3. Campbell IG, Foulkes WD, Senger G, et al. Molecular cloning of the B-CAM cell surface glycoprotein of epithelial cancers: a novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. Cancer Res. 1994;54:5761-5765.
4. Rahuel C, Le Van KC, Mattei MG, Cartron JP, Colin Y. A unique gene encodes spliceoforms of the B-cell adhesion molecule cell surface glycoprotein of epithelial cancer and of the Lutheran blood group glycoprotein. Blood. 1996;88:1865-1872.
5. El Nemer W, Colin Y, Bauvy C, et al. Isoforms of the Lutheran/basal cell adhesion molecule glycoprotein are differentially delivered in polarized epithelial cells: mapping of the basolateral sorting signal to a cytoplasmic di-leucine motif. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:31903-31908.
6. Parsons SF, Lee G, Spring FA, et al. Lutheran blood group glycoprotein and its newly characterized mouse homologue specifically bind alpha5 chain-containing human laminin with high affinity. Blood. 2001;97:312-320.
7. Moulson CL, Li C, Miner JH. Localization of Lutheran, a novel laminin receptor, in normal, knockout, and transgenic mice suggests an interaction with laminin alpha5 in vivo. Dev Dyn. 2001;222:101-114.
8. El Nemer W, Gane P, Colin Y, et al. The Lutheran blood group glycoproteins, the erythroid receptors for laminin, are adhesion molecules. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:16686-16693.
9. Udani M, Zen Q, Cottman M, et al. Basal cell adhesion molecule/lutheran protein: the receptor critical for sickle cell adhesion to laminin. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:2550-2558.
10. Aumailley M, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Carter WG, et al. A simplified laminin nomenclature. Matrix Biol. 2005;24:326-332.
11. Lee SP, Cunningham ML, Hines PC, et al. Sickle cell adhesion to laminin: potential role for the alpha5 chain. Blood. 1998;92:2951-2958.
12. Parsons SF, Spring FA, Chasis JA, Anstee DJ. Erythroid cell adhesion molecules Lutheran and LW in health and disease. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 1999;12:729-745.
13. Hines PC, Zen Q, Burney SN, et al. Novel epinephrine and cyclic AMP-mediated activation of BCAM/Lu-dependent sickle (SS) RBC adhesion. Blood. 2003;101:3281-3287.
14. Murphy MM, Zayed MA, Evans A, et al. Role of Rap1 in promoting sickle red blood cell adhesion to laminin via BCAM/LU. Blood. 2005;105:3322-3329.
15. Gauthier E, Rahuel C, Wautier MP, et al. Protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation of Lutheran/basal cell adhesion molecule glycoprotein regulates cell adhesion to laminin alpha5. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:30055-30062.
16. El Nemer W, Gane P, Colin Y, et al. Characterization of the laminin binding domains of the Lutheran blood group glycoprotein. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:23757-23762.
17. Kikkawa Y, Moulson CL, Virtanen I, Miner JH. Identification of the binding site for the Lutheran blood group glycoprotein on laminin alpha 5 through expression of chimeric laminin chains in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:44864-44869.
18. Kikkawa Y, Sasaki T, Nguyen MT, et al. The LG1-3 tandem of Laminin {alpha}5 harbors the binding sites of Lutheran/basal cell adhesion molecule and {alpha}3beta1/{alpha}6beta1 integrins. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:14853-14860.
19. Yu H, Talts JF. Beta1 integrin and alpha-dystroglycan binding sites are localized to different laminin-G-domain-like (LG) modules within the laminin alpha5 chain G domain. Biochem J. 2003;371:289-299.
20. Ido H, Harada K, Futaki S, et al. Molecular dissection of the alpha-dystroglycan- and integrinbinding sites within the globular domain of human laminin-10. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:10946-10954.
21. Andac Z, Sasaki T, Mann K, et al. Analysis of heparin, alpha-dystroglycan and sulfatide binding to the G domain of the laminin alpha1 chain by site-directed mutagenesis. J Mol Biol. 1999;287:253-264.
22. Hohenester E, Tisi D, Talts JF, Timpl R. The crystal structure of a laminin G-like module reveals the molecular basis of alpha-dystroglycan binding to laminins, perlecan, and agrin. Mol Cell. 1999;4:783-792.
23. Talts JF, Andac Z, Gohring W, Brancaccio A, Timpl R. Binding of the G domains of laminin alpha1 and alpha2 chains and perlecan to heparin, sulfatides, alpha-dystroglycan and several extracellular matrix proteins. EMBO J. 1999;18:863-870.
24. Wizemann H, Garbe JH, Friedrich MV, et al. Distinct requirements for heparin and alpha-dystroglycan binding revealed by structure-based mutagenesis of the laminin alpha2 LG4-LG5 domain pair. J Mol Biol. 2003;332:635-642.
25. Michele DE, Campbell KP. Dystrophin-glycoprotein complex: post-translational processing and dystroglycan function. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:15457-15460.
26. Wang JH, Smolyar A, Tan K, et al. Structure of a heterophilic adhesion complex between the human CD2 and CD58 (LFA-3) counterreceptors. Cell. 1999;97:791-803.
27. Evans EJ, Castro MA, O'Brien R, et al. Crystal structure and binding properties of the CD2 and CD244 (2B4)-binding protein, CD48. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:29309-29320.
28. Dando J, Wilkinson KW, Ortlepp S, King DJ, Brady RL. A reassessment of the MAdCAM-1 structure and its role in integrin recognition. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2002;58:233-241.
29. Schneider TR, Sheldrick GM. Substructure solution with SHELXD. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2002;58:1772-1779.
30. CCP4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1994;50:760-763.
31. Perrakis A, Morris R, Lamzin VS. Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6:458-463.
32. McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Likelihood-enhanced fast translation functions. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2005;61:458-464.
33. Brunger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, et al. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1998;54:905-921.
34. Davis IW, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. MOLPROBITY: structure validation and allatom contact analysis for nucleic acids and their complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W615-W619.
35. Kvansakul M, Hopf M, Ries A, Timpl R, Hohenester E. Structural basis for the high-affinity interaction of nidogen-1 with immunoglobulin-like domain 3 of perlecan. EMBO J. 2001;20:5342-5346.
36. Cuff JA, Barton GJ. Evaluation and improvement of multiple sequence methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins. 1999;34:508-519.
37. Cuff JA, Clamp ME, Siddiqui AS, Finlay M, Barton GJ. JPred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:892-893.
38. Karplus K, Karchin R, Draper J, et al. Combining local-structure, fold-recognition, and new fold methods for protein structure prediction. Proteins. 2003;53(suppl 6):491-496.
39. Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, et al. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2000;29:291-325.
40. Baldock C, Siegler V, Bax DV, et al. Nanostructure of fibrillin-1 reveals compact conformation of EGF arrays and mechanism for extensibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:11922-11927.
41. Pedersen JS. A flux- and background-optimized version of the NanoSTAR small-angle X-ray scattering camera for solution scattering. J Appl Cryst. 2004;37:369-378.
42. Parsons SF, Mallinson G, Daniels GL, et al. Use of domain-deletion mutants to locate Lutheran blood group antigens to each of the five immunoglobulin superfamily domains of the Lutheran glycoprotein: elucidation of the molecular basis of the Lu(a)/Lu(b) and the Au(a)/Au(b) polymorphisms. Blood. 1997;89:4219-4225.
43. Mankelow TJ, Spring FA, Parsons SF, et al. Identification of critical amino-acid residues on the erythroid intercellular adhesion molecule-4 (ICAM-4) mediating adhesion to alpha V integrins. Blood. 2004;103:1503-1508.
44. Crew VK, Green C, Daniels G. Molecular bases of the antigens of the Lutheran blood group system. Transfusion. 2003;43:1729-1737.
45. Svergun DI. Restoring low resolution structure of biological macromolecules from solution scattering using simulated annealing. Biophys J. 1999;76:2879-2886.
46. Petoukhov MV, Svergun DI. Global rigid body modeling of macromolecular complexes against small-angle scattering data. Biophys J. 2005;89:1237-1250.
47. Svergun DI, Petoukhov MV, Koch MH. Determination of domain structure of proteins from X-ray solution scattering. Biophys J. 2001;80:2946-2953.
48. Wu H, Kwong PD, Hendrickson WA. Dimeric association and segmental variability in the structure of human CD4. Nature. 1997;387:527-530.
49. Jones EY, Davis SJ, Williams AF, Harlos K, Stuart DI. Crystal structure at 2.8 A resolution of a soluble form of the cell adhesion molecule CD2. Nature. 1992;360:232-239.
50. Li J, Smolyar A, Sunder-Plassmann R, Reinherz EL. Ligand-induced conformational change within the CD2 ectodomain accompanies receptor clustering: implication for molecular lattice formation. J Mol Biol. 1996;263:209-226.
51. Maenaka K, Juji T, Stuart DI, Jones EY. Crystal structure of the human p58 killer cell inhibitory receptor (KIR2DL3) specific for HLA-Cw3-related MHC class I. Structure. 1999;7:391-398.
52. Hatherley D, Harlos K, Dunlop DC, Stuart DI, Barclay AN. The structure of the macrophage signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPalpha) inhibitory receptor reveals a binding face reminiscent of that used by T cell receptors. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:14567-14575.
53. Diamond MS, Staunton DE, Marlin SD, Springer TA. Binding of the integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) to the third immunoglobulin-like domain of ICAM-1 (CD54) and its regulation by glycosylation. Cell. 1991;65:961-971.
54. Freigang J, Proba K, Leder L, et al. The crystal structure of the ligand binding module of axonin-1/TAG-1 suggests a zipper mechanism for neural cell adhesion. Cell. 2000;101:425-433.
55. Su XD, Gastinel LN, Vaughn DE, et al. Crystal structure of hemolin: a horseshoe shape with implications for homophilic adhesion. Science. 1998;281:991-995.
56. Soroka V, Kolkova K, Kastrup JS, et al. Structure and interactions of NCAM Ig1-2-3 suggest a novel zipper mechanism for homophilic adhesion. Structure. 2003;11:1291-1301.
57. Mankelow T, Burton N, Stefansdottir FO, et al. Characterisation of the laminin 10/11 binding site on the Lutheran glycoprotein suggests a novel type of protein-protein interaction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. December 9, 2006. Orlando, FL.