A daylong clinical laboratory: From gaming to high-fidelity simulators

Nurse Educator

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 274-277

  Bantz, Diana ^a   Dancer, Michelle Mattice ^a   Hodson Carlton, Kay ^a   Van Hove, Sharon ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DELIVERY; DOCUMENTATION; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN NURSING; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; OBSTETRICAL NURSING; POSTNATAL CARE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECREATION; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; DOCUMENTATION; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; HUMANS; INDIANA; MANIKINS; MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; NEONATAL NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; NURSING RECORDS; OBSTETRICAL NURSING; POSTNATAL CARE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENTS, NURSING; TEACHING MATERIALS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 36048980920     PISSN: 03633624     EISSN: 15389855     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000299476.57185.f3     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Haskvitz LM, Koop EC. Students struggling in clinical? A new role for the patient simulator. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43(4):181-185.
2. Alinier G, Hunt B, Gordon R, Harwood C. Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54(3):359-369.
3. Bellack JP. Changing nursing education: creating our tipping point. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43(8):339-340.
4. Peteani LA. Enhancing clinical practice and education with high-fidelity human patient simulators. Nurs Educ. 2004;29(1):25-30.
5. Bremner MN, Aduddell K, Bennett DN, VanGeest JB. The use of human patient simulators: best practices with novice nursing students. Nurs Educ. 2006;31(4):170-174.
6. Seropian MA, Brown K, Samuelson Gavilanes J, Driggers B. Simulation: not just a manikin. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43(4):164-169.
7. Feingold CE, Calaluce M, Kallen MA. Computerized patient model and simulated clinical experiences: evaluation with baccalaureate nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43(4):156-163.
8. National League for Nursing. Simulations in nursing education page. http://www.nln.org/research/nln_laerdal/index.htm. Accessed February 12, 2007.
9. Nehring WM, Lashley FR. Current use and opinions regarding human patient simulators in nursing education: an international survey. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2004;25(5):244-248.
10. Spunt D, Foster D, Adams K. Mock code: a clinical simulation module. Nurs Educ. 2004;29(5):192-194.
11. Ziv A, Small SD, Wolpe PR. Patient safety and simulation-based medical education. Med Teach. 2000;22(5):489-496.
12. Bearnson CS, Wiker KM. Human patient simulators: a new face in baccalaureate nursing education at Brigham Young University. J Nurs Educ. 2005;44(9):421-426.
13. Henneman EA, Cunningham H. Using clinical simulation to teach patient safety in an acute/critical care nursing course. Nurs Educ. 2005;30:172-177.
14. Cioffi J, Purcal N, Arundell F. A pilot study to investigate the effect of a simulation strategy on the clinical decision making of midwifery students. J Nurs Educ. 2005;44(3):131-134.