Task sets under reconstruction: Effects of partially incorrect precues

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 521-546

  Kleinsorge, Thomas ^a   Gajewski, Patrick D ^a   Heuer, Herbert ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17644405459     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: 14640740     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000034     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Associates, Inc.
2. Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000). 'Task-switching', stimulus-response bindings and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Amelang, M., & Lasogga, F. (1974). Welche Wirkung hat die Vorankündigung von Reaktionen auf die Reaktionszeit? Zeitschrift fur experimentelle und angewandte Psychologte, 21, 1-24.
4. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
5. De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Cognitive control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 468-483.
7. Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo,V. (2000). What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345-352.
8. Heuer, H., Schmidtke, V., & Kleinsorgc, T. (2001). Implicit learning of sequences of tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 967-983.
9. Kleinsorge, T., & Gajewski, P. D. (in press). Preparation for a forthcoming task is sufficient to produce subsequent shift costs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
10. Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62, 300-312.
11. Kleinsorge, T., Heuer, H., & Schmidtke, V. (2001a). Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space is not induced by specific task cues. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 209, 105-117.
12. Kleinsorge, T., Heuer, H., & Schmidtke, V. (2001b). Task-set reconfiguration with binary and three-valued task dimension. Psychological Research, 65, 192-201.
13. Kleinsorge, T., Heuer, H., & Schmidtke, V. (2002). Processes of task-set reconfiguration: Switching operations and implementation operations. Acta Psychologica, 111, 1-28.
14. Kleinsorge, T., Schmidtke, V., Gajewski, P. D., & Heuer, H. (2003). The futility of explicit knowledge of a sequence of tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 455-469.
15. Koch, I. (2003). The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 488-492.
16. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
17. Meiran, N. (1996). The reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
18. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
19. Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797.
20. Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception und Performance, 27, 1404-1419.
21. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.
22. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
23. Yeung, N., & Monsell, S. (2003). The effects of recent practice on task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 919-936.