Sociophonetics

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volumn 36, Issue , 2007, Pages 89-103

  Hay, Jennifer ^a   Drager, Katie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Discourse; Ethnography; Phonetics; Sociolinguistics; Variation

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT DISCOURSE; INNOVATION; PERCEPTION;

EID: 35948947908     PISSN: 00846570     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120633     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Bailey G. 2001. Real and apparent time. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. JK Chambers, P Trudgill, N. Schilling-Estes, pp. 312-32. Malden, MA: Blackwell
2. Bayard D, Weatherall A, Gallois C, Pittam J. 2001. Pax Americana?: Accent attitudinal evaluations in New Zealand, Australia, and America. J. Socioling. 5(1):22-49
3. Bell A. 1984. Language style as audience design. Lang. Soc. 13:145-204
4. Bell A. 2001. Back in style: reworking audience design. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. P Eckert, JR Rickford, pp. 139-69. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
5. Bucholtz M. 1996. Geek the girl: language, femininity, and female nerds. Gender and Belief Systems. Proc. Berkeley Women Lang. Conf., 4th, Berkeley, pp. 119-31, ed. N Warner, J Ahlers, L Bilmes, M Oliver, S Wertheim, M Chen. Berkeley: Berk. Women Lang. Group.
6. Bucholtz M. 1999. "Why be normal?": Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Lang. Soc. 28(2):203-23
7. Calif. Style Collect. 1993. Variation and personal/group style. Presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 22, Stanford Univ., Palo Alto
8. Campbell-Kibler K. 2006. Listener perceptions of sociolinguistic variables: the case of (ING). PhD thesis. Stanford Univ., 282 pp.
9. Carter PM. 2005. Prosodic variation in SLA: rhythm in an urban North Carolina Hispanic community. Penn. Work. Pap. Ling. 11(2):59-71
10. Cedergren H. 1973. The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. PhD thesis. Cornell Univ.
11. Choi S, Bowerman M. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41(1-3):83-121
12. Conn J. 2005. Of "moice" and men: the evolution of a male-led sound change. PhD thesis. Univ. Penn, 203 pp.
13. Coupland N. 1984. Accommodation at work. Int. J. Sociol. Lang. 46:49-70
14. Coupland N. 2001. Language, situation and the relational self: theorising dialect style in sociolinguistics. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. P Eckert, JR Rickford, pp. 185-200, Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
15. Di Paolo M, Faber A. 1990. Phonation differences and the phonetic content of the tense-lax contrast in Utah English. Lang. Var. Chang. 2:155-204
16. Docherty GJ. 2006. Developing a sociophonetic perspective on variation and change: some empirical and theoretical dimensions. Presented at N.Z. Lang. Soc. Conf., Christchurch
17. Docherty GJ, Foulkes P. 1999. Derby and Newcastle: instrumental phonetics and variationist studies. In Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, ed. P Foulkes, GJ Docherty, pp. 47-71. London: Arnold
18. Docherty GJ, Foulkes P. 2005. Glottal variants of (t) in the Tyneside variety of English: an acoustic profiling study. In A Figure of Speech - A Festschrift for John Laver, ed. W Hardcastle, J Mackenzie Beck, pp. 173-99. London: Lawrence Erlbaum
19. Docherty GJ, Foulkes P, Khattab G. 2004. Social-indexicality and speech perception: an experimental study. Presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 33, Univ. Mich.
20. Drager K. 2006a. From bad to bed: the relationship between perceived age and vowel perception in New Zealand English. Te. Reo. 48:55-68
21. Drager K. 2006b. Social categories, grammatical categories, and the likelihood of "like" monophthongization. Proc. Aust. Int. Conf. Speech Sci. Tech., 11th, Auckland, pp. 384-87. Auckland: Univ. Auck. Press
22. Drager K, Hay J. 2006. Can you really believe your ears? The effect of stuffed toys on speech perception. Presented at N.Z. Lang. Soc. Conf., Christchurch
23. Eckert P. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Identity in the High School. New York: Teach. Coll. Press
24. Eckert P. 1996. Vowels and nail polish: the emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. Gender and Belief Systems: Proc. Berkeley Women Lang. Conf., 4th, Berkeley, pp. 183-90, ed. N Warner, J Ahlers, L Bilmes, M Oliver, S Wertheim, M Chen,. Berkeley: Berk. Women Lang. Group.
25. Eckert P. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell
26. Eckert P. 2005. Variation, convention and social meaning. Presented at Annu. Meet. Ling. Soc. Am., San Francisco
27. Fasold R. 1990. The Sociolinguistics of Language. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell
28. Foulkes P. 2002. Current trends in British sociophonetics. Work. Pap. 8.3, Dep. Ling., U. Penn., pp. 75-86
29. Foulkes P, Docherty GJ. 2006. The social life of phonetics and phonology. J. Phon. 34(4):409-38
30. Foulkes P, Docherty GJ, Watt DJ. 1999. Tracking the emergence of sociophonetic variation in 2 to 4 year olds. Proc. Int. Cong. Phon. Sci., 14th, pp. 1625-28. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
31. Foulkes P, Docherty GJ, Watt DJ. 2001. The emergence of structured variation. Work. Pap. 7.3, Dep. Ling., U. Penn., pp. 67-84
32. Foulkes P, Docherty GJ, Watt DJ. 2005. Phonological variation in child directed speech. Language 81:177-206
33. Fox Tree JE, Clark HH. 1997. Pronouncing "the" as "thee" to signal problems in speaking. Cognition 62:151-67
34. Goldinger S. 1997. Words and voices: perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In Talker Variability in Speech processing. ed. K Johnson, JW Mullenix, pp. 33-66. London: Academic
35. Gordon E. 1997. Sex, speech, and stereotypes: why women use prestige speech forms more than men. Lang. Soc. 26(1):47-63
36. Grabe E, Low EL. 2002. Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Pap. Lab. Phon. 7, Mouton
37. Guy G. 1981. Syntactic and phonetic variation in Carioca portuguese. PhD thesis. Univ. Penn.
38. Harrington J, Palethorpe S, Watson C. 2000. Does the Queen speak the Queen's English? Elizabeth II's traditional pronunciation has been influenced by modern trends. Nature 408:927-28
39. Harrington J, Palethorpe S, Watson C. 2005. Deepening or lessening the divide between diphthongs? An analysis of the Queen's annual Christmas Broadcasts. In A Figure of Speech. Studies in Honour of John Laver, ed. W Hardcastle, J Beck, pp. 227-62. London: Lawrence Erlbaum
40. Hawkins S. 2003. Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding J. Phon. 31:373-405
41. Hay J, Jannedy S, Mendoza-Denton N. 1999. Oprah and /ay/: lexical frequency, referee design and style. Proc. Int. Cong. Phon. Sci., 14th, San Francisco, pp. 1389-92
42. Hay J, Maclagan M. 2006. Are all/r/s alike? Degrees of constriction in New Zealand English intrusive /r/. Presented at NX Lang. Soc. Conf., Christchurch
43. Hay J, Nolan A, Drager K. 2006a. From fush to feesh: exemplar priming in speech perception. Ling. Rev. 23(3):351-79
44. Hay J, Warren P, Drager K. 2006b. Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. J. Phon. 34(4):458-84
45. Hong YY, Morris MW, Chiu CY, Benet-Martinez V. 2000. Multicultural minds: a dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. Am. Psychol. 55:709-20
46. Horvath B. 1985. Variation in Australian English: The Sociolects of Sydney. London: Cambridge Univ. Press
47. Ito R. 1999. Diffusion of urban sound change in rural Michigan: a case of Northern Cities Shift. Ph.D thesis. Mich. State Univ.
48. Jannedy S, Mendoza-Denton N. 2005. Structuring information through gesture and intonation. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 03, ed. S Ishihara, M Schmitz, A Schwarz, pp. 199-244. Potsdam: Univ. Potsdam
49. Johnson K. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: an exemplar model. In Talker Variability in Speech Processing, ed. K. Johnson, JW Mullennix, pp. 145-65. San Diego: Academic
50. Johnson K, Strand EA, D'Imperio M. 1999. Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. J. Phon. 27:359-84
51. Johnson S. 2006. If you're "happy" and you know it, front your /ae/. Presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 35, Ohio
52. Johnstone B. 2007. Linking identity and dialect through stancetaking. Proc. Bien. Rice Univ. Ling. Symp., 10th, ed. R Englebretson. Amsterdam: John Benjamin
53. Labov W. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:273-309
54. Labov W. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Cent. Appl. Ling.
55. Labov W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
56. Labov W, Yaeger M, Steiner R. 1972. A Quantitative Analysis of Sound Change in Progress. Philadelphia: US Reg. Survey
57. Lawson R. 2005. Sociolinguistic constructions of identity in a Glasgow high school. MA thesis. Univ. Glasgow. 108 pp.
58. Levinson S. 1996. Language and Space. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 25:353-82
59. Local J. 2003. Variable domains and variable relevance: interpreting phonetic exponents. J. Phon. 31:321-39
60. Local J, Kelly J. 1986. Projection and "silences": notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Hum. Stud. 9:185-204
61. Local J, Walker G. 2004. Abrupt-joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns. J. Pragmat. 36(8):1375-1403
62. Macaulay RKS. 1977. Language, Social Class and Education: A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh: Univ. Edinb. Press
63. Maclagan M. 1982. An acoustic study of New Zealand English vowels. N.Z. Speech Ther. J. 37:20-26
64. Maclagan M, Hay J. 2007. Getting fed up with our feet: Contrast Maintenance and the New Zealand English 'short' front vowel shift. Lang. Var. Chang. 19:1-27
65. McClure JD. 1995. The vowels of Scottish English - formants and features. In Studies in General and English Phonetics: Essays in Honour of Professor J. D. O'Connor, ed. JW Lewis, pp. 367-78. London: Routledge
66. Mendoza-Denton N. 1997. Chicana/Mexicana identity and linguistic variation: an ethnographic and sociolinguistic study of gang affiliation in an urban high school. PhD thesis. Stanford Univ. 152 pp.
67. Mendoza-Denton N. 2000. Style. Lex. New Millenn: J. Ling. Anthropol. 9(1-2):238-40
68. Mendoza-Denton N, Hay J, Jannedy S. 2003. Probabilistic sociolinguistics: beyond variable rules. In Probabilistic Linguistics. ed. R Bod, J Hay, S Jannedy, pp. 97-138. Malden, MA: MIT Press
69. Mendoza-Denton N, Jannedy S. 1998. Implementation of super-low tones in Latina gang girl speech. Presented at Perc. Perf. Gend. Conf. Keil, Germ.
70. Milroy L. 1987. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 2nd ed.
71. Modaressi Y. 1978. A sociolinguistic analysis of modern Persian. PhD thesis. Univ. Kans.
72. Niedzielski N. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 18(1):62-85
73. Nisbett RE, Miyamoto Y. 2005. The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9(10):467-73
74. Norenzayan A, Smith EE, Kim BJ, Nisbett RE. 2002. Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 26(5):653-84
75. Ochs E. 1992. Indexing gender. In Rethinking Context: Language As an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. A Duranti, M Goodwin, pp. 335-58. Cambridge, UK. Camb. Univ. Press
76. Peng K, Knowles E. 2003. Culture, ethnicity and the attribution of physical causality. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29:1272-84
77. Pierrehumbert J. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. Frequency Effects and Emergent Grammar, ed. J Bybee, PJ Hopper, pp. 137-58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
78. Pierrehumbert J. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. In Laboratory Phonology 7, ed. C Gussenhoven, N Warner, pp. 101-39. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
79. Podesva R. 2006. Phonetic detail in sociolinguistic variation: its linguistic significance and role in the construction of social meaning. PhD thesis, Stanford Univ. 232 pp.
80. Rickford J, McNair-Knox F. 1994. Addressee- and topic- influenced style shift: a quantitative sociolinguistic study. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. D Biber, E Finegan, pp. 235-76. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
81. Roberts J. 1997. Hitting a moving target: acquisition of sound change in progress by Philadelphia children. Lang. Var. Chang. 9:249-66
82. Romaine S. 1978. Postvocalic /r/ in Scottish English: sound change in progress? Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. In Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English, ed. P. Trudgill, pp. 144-56. London: Edward Arnold
83. Rose M. 2006. Language, place and identity in later life. PhD thesis, Stanford Univ. 150 pp.
84. Schilling-Estes N. 1998. Investigating "self-concious" speech: the performance register in Ocracoke English. Lang. Soc. 27:53-83
85. Schilling-Estes N. 2001. Investigating stylistic variation. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. JK Chambers, P Trudgill, N Schilling-Estes, pp. 375-401. Malden, MA: Blackwell
86. Starr R, Greene R. 2006. Beyond cuteness: the role of voice quality in performing stylized feminities in Japanese. Presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 35, Ohio
87. Strand EA, Johnson K. 1996. Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives. In Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology, ed. D Gibbon, pp. 14-26. Berlin: Mouton
88. Stuart-Smith J. 2004. Empirical evidence for gendered speech production: /s/ in Glaswegian. Conf. Lab. Phon., 9th, Univ. Ill. Urbana
89. Szakay A. 2006. Rhythm and pitch as markers of ethnicity in New Zealand English. Proc. Aust. Int. Conf. Speech Sci. Tech, 11th, Auckland, pp. 421-26. Auckland: Univ. Auck. Press
90. Tagliamonte S. 2006. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
91. Thomas E. 2001. An acoustic analysis of vowel variation in New World English. Am. Dial. Soc. Vol. 85
92. Thomas E. 2002. Instrumental phonetics. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. JK Chambers, P Trudgill, N Schilling-Estes, pp. 168-200. Malden, MA: Blackwell
93. Trudgill P. 1974. Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. New York: Penguin. 204 pp.
94. Veatch TC. 1991. English vowels: their surface phonology and phonetic implementation in vernacular dialects. PhD thesis. U. Penn.
95. Wagner SE. 2006. "We don't act like men": Girls and (ay0) in Philadelphia. Presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 35, Ohio
96. Warren P. 2005. Patterns of late rising in New Zealand - intonational variation or intonational change? Lang. Var. Chang. 17(2):209-30
97. Wassink AB. 2001. Theme and variation in Jamaican vowels? Lang. Var. Chang. 13(2):135-59
98. Wolfram W. 1969. A Linguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Cent. Appl. Ling.
99. Zhang O. 2005. A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Lang. Soc. 34:431-66