From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception

Linguistic Review

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 351-379

  Hay, Jennifer ^a   Nolan, Aaron ^a   Drager, Katie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750822768     PISSN: 01676318     EISSN: 16133676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/TLR.2006.014     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Bauer, Laurie and Paul Warren (2004). New Zealand English phonology. In A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool, vol. 1, B. Kortmann, W. Schneider, K. Burridge, R. Mesthrie and C. Upton (eds.), 580-602. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Bayard, Donn (1990). 'God help us if we all sound like this': Attitudes to New Zealand and other English accents. In New Zealand Ways of Speaking English, Janet Holmes and Allan Bell (eds.), 67-96. Clevedon: Multilangual Matters.
3. _(1995). Kiwitalk: Sociolinguistics and New Zealand Society. Palmerston North: Dunmore Printing Company Ltd.
4. _(2000). New Zealand English: Origins, relationships, and prospects. Moderna Språk 94 (1): 8-14.
5. Bell, Allan (1997). The phonetics of fish and chips in New Zealand: marking national and ethnic identities, English Worldwide 18: 243-270.
6. Bybee, Joan (2001). Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chesire, Jenny (2002). Sex and gender in variationist research. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, J.K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), 423-443. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
8. Cox, Felicity M. (2004). A question of broadness. Paper presented at the Australian Linguistic Society Conference, Sydney, 2004.
9. Davis, P., G. Jenkin, and P. Coope (2003). NZSEI-96: An Update and Revision of the New Zealand Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status, Statistics New Zealand, Wellington.
10. Davis, P., K. McLeod, M. Ransom and P. Ongley (1997). The New Zealand Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status (NZSEI): Research Report #2, Statistics New Zealand, Wellington.
11. Docherty, Gerry and Paul Foulkes (2000). Speaker, speech and knowledge of sounds. In Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues, P. C. N. Burton-Roberts and G. Docherty (eds.), 105-129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Drager, Katie (2005). The influence of social characteristics on speech perception. MA Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
13. _(2006). From bad to bed: the relationship between perceived age and vowel perception in New Zealand English. Te Reo 48: 55-68.
14. Eckert, Penny (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
15. Evans, Zoe and Catherine Watson (2004). An acoustic comparison of Australian and New Zealand English vowel change. In Proceedings of the 10th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Macquarie University, Sydney, December 2004, 195-200.
16. Foulkes, Paul and Gerry Docherty (to appear). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics.
17. Giles, Howard, Nikolas Coupland and Justine Coupland (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics, Howard Giles, Justine Coupland and Nikolas Coupland (eds.), 1-68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Goldinger, Stephen (1997). Words and voices: perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In Talker Variability in Speech Processing, Keith Johnson and John W. Mullenix (eds.), 33-66. London: Academic Press.
19. Harrell, Frank (2001). Regression Modelling Strategies. New York: Springer.
20. Harrington, Jonathan (to appear). An acoustic analysis of happy-tensing in the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of Phonetics.
21. Hawkins, Sarah (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics 31: 373-405.
22. Hay, Jennifer, Paul Warren, and Katie Drager (to appear). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics.
23. Hay, Jennifer, Katie Drager and Paul Warren (2006). Cross-dialectal exemplar priming. Poster presented at 10th Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Paris, June 2006.
24. Hay, Jennifer and Andrea Sudbury (2005). How rhoticity became /r/-sandhi. Language 81 (4): 799-823.
25. Ivory, Helen (2005). Get with the lingo. The New Zealand Listener 199.3396: 11-17.
26. Jansen, Tore and Richard Schulman (1983). Non-distinctive features and their use. Journal of Linguistics 19: 321-336.
27. Johnson, Keith (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization. In Talker Variability in Speech Processing, K. A. Johnson and J. W. Mullennix (eds.), 145-166. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. _(to appear). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics.
29. Johnson, Keith, Elizabeth A. Strand and Mariapaola D'Imperio (1999). Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics 27: 359-384.
30. Langstrof, Christian (2003). The short front vowels in New Zealand English in the intermediate period. New Zealand English Journal 17: 4-16.
31. _(2006). Acoustic evidence for a push-chain shift in the intermediate period of New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 18 (2): 141-164.
32. Ludwig, Ilka (2005). "Six dancers" - An accent identification study on New Zealand and Australian English. Unpublished course project, University of Canterbury.
33. Maclagan, Margaret A., Elizabeth Gordon and Gillian Lewis (1999). Women and sounds change: Conservative and innovative behaviour by the same speakers. Language Variation and Change 11: 19-11.
34. Maclagan, Margaret and Jennifer Hay (forthcoming). Getting fed up with our feet. Contrast maintenance and the New Zealand English 'short' front vowel shift. Language Variation and Change 19: 1-25.
35. McMurray, Bob (in preparation). Klattworks: A [somewhat] new systematic approach to formant-based speech synthesis for empirical research.
36. Mendoza-Denton, Norma (1999). Style. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9(1, 2): 238-240.
37. Mendoza-Denton, Norma, Jennifer Hay and Stefanie Jannedy (2003). Probabilistic Sociolinguistics: Beyond Variable Rules. In Probabilistic Linguistics, Rens Bod. Jennifer Hay and Stefanie Jannedy (eds.), 97-138. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.
38. Niedzielski, Nancy (1997). The effect of social information on the phonetic perception of sociolinguistic variables. PhD Dissertation, UC Santa Barbara.
39. _(1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18 (1): 62-85.
40. Pierrehumbert, Janet (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.), 137-157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41. _(2002). Word-specific phonetics. In Laboratory Phonology, vol. 7, Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner (eds.), 101-139. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
42. R Development Core Team (2004). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
43. Schilling-Estes, Natalie (2002). Investigating stylistic variation. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), 375-401. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
44. Scobbie, James (2005). The phonetics-phonology overlap. QMUC Speech Science Research Centre working Paper WP1.
45. Smith, Rachel (2003). Influence of talker-specific phonetic detail on word segmentation. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona, 1466-1468. ICPhS.
46. Strand, Elizabeth A. (1999). Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18 (1): 86-99.
47. Watson, Catherine, Jonathan Harrington and Zoe Evans (1998). An acoustic comparison between New Zealand, and Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics 18 (2): 185-207.