Variable domains and variable relevance: Interpreting phonetic exponents

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 31, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 321-339

  Local, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344581052     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00045-7     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alfonso, P. J., & Baer, T. (1982). Dynamics of vowel articulation. Language and Speech, 25, 151-173.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Benguerel, A-P., & Cowan, H. A. (1974). Coarticulation of upper lip protrusion in French. Phonetica, 30, 41-55.
4. Boardman, I., Grossberg, S., Myers, C., & Cohen, M. (1999). Neural dynamics of perceptual order and context effects for variable-rate speech syllables. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1477-1500.
5. Carter, P. G. (2002). Structured variation in British English liquids: The role of resonance. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of York.
6. Carter, P. G. (2003). Extrinsic phonetic interpretation: Spectral variation in English liquids. In J. Local, R. A. Ogden, & R. Temple (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VI: Phonetic interpretation (pp. 234-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Coleman, J. S. (1998). Cognitive reality and the phonological lexicon: A review. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 295-320.
8. Coleman, J. S. (2003). Discovering the acoustic correlates of phonological contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 31, doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2003.10.001
9. Davenport, M., & Hannahs, S. J. (1998). Introducing phonetics & phonology. London: Arnold.
10. Docherty, G. J., Milroy, J., Milroy, L., & Walshaw, D. (1997). Descriptive adequacy in phonology: A variationist perspective. Journal of Linguistics, 33, 275-310.
11. Fant, C. G. M. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.
12. Firth, J. R. (1948). Sounds and Prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society, 127-152.
13. Fosler-Lussier, F., & Morgan, N. (1999). Effects of speaking rate and word frequency on conversational pronunciations. Speech Communication, 29(2-4), 137-158.
14. Goldinger, S. D. (1997). Words and voices: perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In K. Johnson, & J. W. Mullenix (Eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing (pp. 33-66). San Diego: Academic Press.
15. Goldinger, S. D., & Azuma, T. (2003). Puzzle-solving science: the quixotic quest for units in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31, doi:10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00030-5
16. Grossberg, S. (2003). Resonant neural dynamics of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31, doi:10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00051-2
17. Hawkins, S. (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31, doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2003.09.006
18. Hawkins, S., & Nguyen, N. (2004). Influence of syllable-coda voicing on the acoustic properties of syllable-onset /1/ in English. Journal of Phonetics, 32, doi: 10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00031-7
19. Hawkins, S., & Slater, A. (1994). Spread of CV and V-to-V coarticulation in British English: Implications for the intelligibility of synthetic speech. Proceedings of the International Conference of Spoken Language Processing 94, Vol. 1, (pp. 57-60).
20. Hawkins, S., & Smith, R. (2001). Polysp: A polysystemic, phonetically-rich approach to speech understanding. Italian Journal of Linguistics - Rivista di Linguistica, 13, 99-188.
21. Heid, S., & Hawkins, S. (2000). An acoustical study of long-domain /r/ and /1/ coarticulation. In Proceedings of the fifth seminar on speech production: models and data (ISCA). Kloster Seeon, Bavaria, Germany (pp. 77-80).
22. Jones, D. (1934). An outline of English phonetics. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons Ltd.
23. Kelly, J. (1989). Consonant-associated resonance in three varieties of English. In J. Windsor-Lewis (Ed.), Studies in general and English phonetics (pp. 335-349). London: Routledge.
24. Kelly, J., & Local, J. (1986). Long domain resonance patterns in English. Proceedings of IEE Conference on speech input/output: Techniques and applications (pp. 304-309). London: Institution of Electrical Engineers.
25. Kelly, J., & Local, J. (1989). Doing phonology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
26. Kerswill, P., & Wright, S. (1989). On the limits of auditory transcription: A sociophonetic approach. York Papers in Linguistics, 14, 35-59.
27. Krakow, R. A. (1993). Nonsegmental influences on velum movement patterns: Syllables, sentences, stress and speaking rate. In M. K. Huffman, & R. A. Krakow (Eds.), Nasal, nasalization and the velum (pp. 87-113). New York: Academic Press.
28. Kreidler, C. W. (1989). The pronunciation of English: A course book in phonology. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
29. Kwong, K., & Stevens, K. N. (1999). On the voiced-voiceless distinctions for writer/rider, MIT-RLE. Speech Communication Group working papers, 11, 1-20.
30. Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). Sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
31. Lavoie, L. (2002). Some influences on the realisation of for and four in American English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 32(2), 175-202.
32. Lerner, G. (1996). On the 'semi-permeable' character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238-276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Local, J. K. (1996). Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Ethnomethodological studies (pp. 175-230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Local, J. K. (2000). Speaking other people's minds: The phonetics of Collaborative Completions. Patterns of speech sounds in unscripted communication, Sankelmark, Germany. Organised by IPDSP, Kiel, under the auspices of the International Phonetics Association. Handout and sound files downloadable from http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang4/John-Local-talks.html.
35. Local, J. K. (2002). Getting back to 'prior' talk: and-uh(m) as a skip connecting device. Special prosody panel, International conference on conversation analysis, Cophenhagen, Denmark. Handout and sound files downloadable from http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang4/John-Local-talks.html.
36. Local, J. K., & Carter, P. G. (2002). Structured variation in the phonetic interpretation of British English liquids. Final report for ESRC award R000223534.
37. Local, J. K., & Kelly, J. (1986). Projection and 'silences': Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9(2-3), 185-204.
38. Local, J. K., Kelly, J., & Wells, W. H. G. (1986). Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics, 22, 411-437.
39. Local, J. K., & Walker, G. (2002). On the sequential distribution of a phonetic event: Rushthroughs as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns. Euroconference on interactional linguistics, Helsinki, Finland. http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang4/John-Local-talks.html.
40. Manuel, S. Y. (1995). Speakers nasalise /o/ after /n/, but still hear /o/. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 453-476.
41. Nolan, F. (1992). The descriptive role of segments: evidence from assimilation. In G. J. Docherty, & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II (pp. 261-280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 299-325.
43. Ogden, R. A. (1997). Final report for ESRC award R000221880. A declarative account of deletion phenomena in English phonetics and phonology.
44. Ogden, R. A. (1999). A declarative account of strong and weak auxiliaries in English. Phonology, 16, 55-92.
45. Ogden, R. A. (2001). Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(1), 139-152.
46. Ogden, R. A., & Local, J. K. (1994). Disentangling autosegments from prosodies: A note on the misrepresentation of a research tradition in phonology. Journal of Linguistics, 30, 477-498.
47. Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee, & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 137-157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Pöppel, E. (1997). A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 56-61.
49. Port, R. (1979). Influence of tempo on stop closure duration as a cue for voicing and place. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 45-56.
50. Port, R., & Dalby, J. (1982). Consonant/vowel ration as a cue for voicing in English. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 141-152.
51. Recasens, D. (1989). Long-range coarticulation effects for tongue-dorsum contact in VCVCV sequences. Speech Communication, 8, 293-307.
52. Recasens, D., Fontdevila, J., & Pallarès, M. D. (1996). Linguopalatal coarticulation and alveolar-palatal correlations for velarized and non-velarized /1/. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 165-185.
53. van Santen, J. P. H., Coleman, J. S., & Randolph, M. A. (1992). Effects of postvocalic voicing on the time course of vowels and diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(4)(Part. 2), 2444.
54. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organisation: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reflections on study prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41(3-4), 235-263.
56. Schiffren, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Scott, D. (1984). More on the /t/:/d/ distinction in american alveolar flaps. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(suppl. 1), 566.
58. Shriberg, E. (1999). Phonetic consequences of speech dysfluency. In J. J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A. C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIVth international congress of phonetic sciences, Vol. 1 (pp. 619-622). Berkeley: University of California.
59. Solé, M-J. (1995). Spatio-temporal patterns of velopharyngeal action in phonetic and phonological organization. Language and Speech, 38, 1-23.
60. Sweet, H. (1910). The sounds of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
61. Thompson, S. A., & Mulac, A. (1991). The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics, 15, 237-251.
62. Tunley, A. (1999). Coarticulatory influences of liquids on vowels in English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
63. Wells, B., & MacFarlane, S. (1998). Prosody as an interactional resource: Turn-projection and overlap. Language and Speech, 41(3-4), 265-294.
64. West, P. (1999). The extent of coarticulation of English liquids: An acoustic and articulatory study. In J. J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A. C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIVth international congress of phonetic sciences., Vol. 3 (pp. 1901-1904). Berkeley: University of California.
65. West, P. (2000). Perception of distributed coarticulatory properties of English /1/ and //. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 405-425.