Abrupt-joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1375-1403

  Local, John ^a   Walker, Gareth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Interaction; Phonetics; Rush through; Topic management; Turn construction

Indexed keywords

EID: 3442900914     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Beckman, Mary, Edwards, Jan, Fletcher, Janet, 1992. Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. In: Docherty, G.J., Ladd, D.R. (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology. II. Gesture, Segment, Prosody. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 68-86.
2. Button, Graham, 1987. Moving out of closings. In: Button, Graham, Lee, John R.E. (Eds.), Talk and Social Organisation, Multilingual Matters. Clevedon, pp. 101-151.
3. Button, Graham, 1990. On varieties of closings. In: Psathas, George, Frankel, Richard M. (Eds.), Interactional Competence. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 93-148.
4. Clift Rebecca Meaning in interaction: the case of actually Language 77 2001 245-291
5. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, 1993. English Speech Rhythm: Form and Function in Everyday Verbal Interaction. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
6. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, 2003. On initial boundary tones in conversation. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 119-122.
7. Dankovicova, Jana, 1999. Articulation variation within the intonation phrase in Czech and English. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 269-272.
8. Drew Paul Holt Elizabeth Figures of speech: figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation Language in Society 27 1998 495-522
9. French Peter Local John Turn competitive incomings Journal of Pragmatics 7 1983 701-715
10. Goldberg, Jo Ann, 1978. Amplitude shift-a mechanism for the affiliation of utterances in conversational interaction. In: Schenkein, Jim (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. Academic Press, New York, pp. 199-218.
11. Heritage John Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry Language in Society 27 1998 291-334
12. Jasperson, Robert, 1998. Repair After Cut-Off: Explorations in the Grammar of Focused Repair of the Turn-Constructional Unit-So-Far. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado.
13. Jasperson, Robert, 2002. Some linguistic aspects of closure cut-off. In: Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A., Thompson, Sandra A. (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 257-286.
14. Jefferson GailIs "No" an acknowledgement token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(-) tokens Journal of Pragmatics 34 2002 1345-1383
15. Jones, Daniel, 1962. An Outline of English Phonetics, 9th ed. Heffer, Cambridge (First published 1918).
16. Kelly, John, Local, John, 1989. Doing Phonology. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
17. Local John Kelly John Projection and 'silences': notes on phonetic and conversational structure Human Studies 9 1986 185-204
18. Local John Kelly John Wells Bill Towards a phonology of conversation: turn-taking in Tyneside English Journal of Linguistics 22 1986 411-437
19. Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., Thompson, Sandra A. (Eds.), 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Ogden Richard Turn transition, creak and gllottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31 2001 139-152
21. Sacks, Harvey, 1987. On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In: Button, Graham, Lee, John R.E. (Eds.), Talk and Social Organisation, Multilingual Matters. Clevedon, pp. 54-69.
22. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1979. The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In: Givon, Talmy (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics. 12. Discourse and Syntax. Academic Press, London, pp. 261-286.
23. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of 'uh huh' and other things that come between sentences. In: Tannen, Deborah (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Linguistics 1981. Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Press, Washington, pp. 71-93.
24. Schegloff Emanuel A. Analyzing single episodes of interaction: an exercise in conversation analysis Social Psychology Quarterly 50 1987a 101-114
25. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1987b. Recycled turn beginnings: a precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organisation. In: Button, Graham, Lee, John R.E. (Eds.), Talk and Social Organisation, Multilingual Matters. Clevedon, pp. 70-85.
26. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1988. Discourse as an interactional achievement. II. An exercise in conversation analysis. In: Tannen, Deborah (Ed.), Linguistics in Context: Connecting, Observation, and Understanding. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 135-158.
27. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1995. Sequence Organization. Unpublished manuscript, UCLA.
28. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1996. Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. In: Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., Thompson, Sandra A. (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 52-133.
29. Schegloff Emanuel A.Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction Language and Speech 41 1998 235-263
30. Schegloff Emanuel A.Jefferson Gail Sacks Harvey The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation Language 53 1977 361-382
31. Schegloff, Emanuel A., Sacks, Harvey, 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica 289-327.
32. Turk, Alice E., 1999. Structural influences on boundary-related lengthening in English. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 237-240.
33. Wells Bill Macfarlane Sarah Prosody as an interactional resource: turn-projection and overlap Language and Speech 41 1998 265-294