Effects of habitual reading motivation on the situational representation of text;Auswirkungen Habitueller Lesemotivation auf die Situative Textrepräsentation

Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 268-286

  Schaffner, Ellen ^a   Schiefele, Ulrich ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Extrinsic motivation; Intrinsic motivation; Reading ability; Reading motivation; Text comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 35448993890     PISSN: 0342183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alexander, P.A. & Jetton, T. L. (1996). The role of importance and interest in the processing of text. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 89-121.
2. Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L. & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 559-575.
3. Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). AMOS 5.0. Update to the AMOS User's Guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation.
4. Artelt, C., Schiefele, U. & Schneider, W. (2001). Predictors of reading literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 363-383.
5. Baker, L., Scher, D. & Mackler, K. (1997). Home and family influences on motivations for literacy. Educational Psychologist, 32, 69-82.
6. Baker, L. & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452-477.
7. Benware, C.A. & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755-765.
8. Bergin, D. A. (1995). Effects of a mastery versus competitive motivation situation on learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 63, 303-314.
9. Clauser, B. (1999). Relating Cronbach and Rasch reliabilities. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 13, 696.
10. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cox, K. E. & Guthrie, J. T. (2001). Motivational and cognitive contributions to students' amount of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 116-131.
12. Davier, M. von (2001). WINMIRA 2001. Kiel: IPN.
13. Durgunoglu, A. Y. & Jehng, J.-C. J. (1991). Elaborative inferences on an expository text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 314-330.
14. Graesser, A.C., Millis, K.K. &Zwaan, R.A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
15. Greaney, V. & Hegarty, M. (1987). Correlates of leisuretime reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 10, 3-20.
16. Grolnick, W. S. & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890-898.
17. Guthrie, J. T. & Knowles, K. T. (2001). Promoting reading motivation. In L. Verhoeven & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Literacy and motivation (pp. 159-176). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Guthrie, J. T., McGough, K., Bennett, L. & Rice, M. E. (1996). Concept-oriented reading instruction: An integrated curriculum to develop motivations and strategies for reading. In L. Baker, P. Afflerbach & D. Reinking (Eds.), Developing engaged readers in school and home communities (pp. 165-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Guthrie, J. T. & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Reading research handbook (Vol. 3, pp. 403-424). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L. & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading 3, 231-256.
21. Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 191-209.
22. Hidi, S. & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing textbased interest and students' recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465-483.
23. Hoyle, R. H. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modelling (pp. 465-497). San Diego: Academic Press.
24. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
25. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
27. Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 23-40.
28. Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H. & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184-196.
29. Linacre, J. M. (1997). KR-20 or Rasch reliability: Which tells the "truth"? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 11, 580-581.
30. Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performanceapproach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students' motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197-213.
31. Macmillan, N. A. & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. McCormick, C. E. & Mason, J. M. (1989). Fostering reading for head start children with little books. In J. Allen & J. Mason (Eds.), Risk makers, risk takers, risk breakers (pp. 154-177). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
33. McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43.
34. McNamara, D.S. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288.
35. Mejding, J. (1993, August). Reading: Speed and/or comprehension? Paper presented at the Nordic Conference on Methodological Issues in Dyslexia Research, Kungälv, Sweden.
36. Mejding, J. (2000). Reading speed test report (unpublished manuscript). Copenhagen: Danish National Institute for Educational Research.
37. Meyer, B. J. F., Talbot, A., Stubblefield, R. A. & Poon, L. W. (1998). Interests and strategies of young and old readers differentially interact with characteristics of texts. Educational Gerontology, 24, 747-771.
38. Millis, K. K. & King, A. C. (2001). Rereading strategically: The influences of comprehension ability and a prior reading on the memory for expository text. Reading Psychology, 22, 41-65.
39. Millis, K. K. & Simon, S. (1994). Rereading scientific texts: Changes in resource allocation. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 115-133). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40. Möller, J. & Schiefele, U. (2004). Motivationale Grundlagen der Lesekompetenz. In U. Schiefele, C. Artelt, W. Schneider & P. Stanat (Hrsg.), Struktur, Entwicklung und Förderung von Lesekompetenz (S. 101-124). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
41. Neubrand, M., Biehler, R., Blum, W., Cohors-Fresenborg, E., Flade, L., Knoche, N., Lind, D., Löding, W., Möller, G. & Wynands, A. (2004). Eine systematische und kommentierte Auswahl von Beispielaufgaben des Mathematiktests in PISA 2000. In M. Neubrand (Hrsg.), Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 (S. 259-270). Wiesbaden: Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.
42. Newth, E. (1998). Die Jagd nach der Wahrheit. Die unendliche Geschichte der Welterforschung. München/Wien: Hanser.
43. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and peformance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
44. Paulos, J. A. (2000). Es war 1mal. Die verborgene mathematische Logik des Alltäglichen. Heidelberg/Berlin: Spektrum.
45. Pekrun, R. (1991). Emotionen in Lern- und Leistungssituationen. In D. Frey (Hrsg.), Bericht über den 37. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Kiel 1990 (Bd. 2, S. 375-381). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
46. Pekrun, R. (1993). Entwicklung von schulischer Aufgabenmotivation in der Sekundarstufe: Ein erwartungswert-theoretischer Ansatz. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 7, 87-97.
47. Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W. & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.
49. Quinn, B. & Jadav, A.D. (1987). Causal relationship between attitude and achivement for elementary grade mathematics and reading. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 366-372.
50. Rheinberg, F. (2002). Motivation. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
51. Rost, J. (2004). Lehrbuch Testtheorie - Testkonstruktion. Bern: Huber.
52. Rowe, K. J. (1991). The influence of reading activity at home on students' attitudes towards reading, classroom attentiveness and reading achievement: An application of structural equation modeling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 19-35.
53. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
54. Sadoski, M. (2001). Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 263 -281.
55. Scarborough, H. S. & Dobrich, W. (1994). On the efficacy of reading to preschoolers. Developmental Review, 14, 245-302.
56. Schafer, J.L. (2000). NORM 2.03 for Windows 95/98/NT [software]. Available: http://www.stat.psu.edu/-jls [2006-04-05].
57. Schafer, J. L. & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
58. Schafer, J. L. & Olsen, M. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545 -571.
59. Schaffner, E., Schiefele, U. & Schneider, W. (2004). Ein erweitertes Verständnis der Lesekompetenz: Die Ergebnisse des nationalen Ergänzungstests. In U. Schiefele, C. Artelt, W. Schneider & P. Stanat (Hrsg.), Struktur, Entwicklung und Förderung von Lesekompetenz (S. 197-242). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
60. Schiefele, U. (1996). Motivation und Lernen mit Texten. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
61. Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257-279.
62. Schiefele, U. & Schreyer, I. (1994). Intrinsische Lernmotivation und Lernen. Ein Überblick zu Ergebnissen der Forschung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 8, 1-13.
63. Schlagmüller, M. & Scheider, W. (1999). Metacognitive knowledge about text processing: A questionnaire (unpublished manuscript). Würzburg: Universität, Fakultät für Psychologie.
64. Schmalhofer, F. & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279-294.
65. Schneider, W., Schlagmüller, M. & Ennemoser, M. (2007). LGVT 6 - 12. Lesegeschwindigkeits- und-verständnistest für die Klassenstufen 6 bis 12. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
66. Schnotz, W. & Dutke, S. (2004). Kognitionspsychologische Grundlagen der Lesekompetenz: Mehrebenenverarbeitung anhand multipler Informationsquellen. In U. Schiefele, C. Artelt, W. Schneider & P. Stanat (Hrsg.), Struktur, Entwicklung und Förderungvon Lesekompetenz (S. 197-242). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
67. Sinharay, S., Stern, H. S. Sc Russell, D. (2001). The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data. Psychological Methods, 6, 317-329.
68. Tardieu, H., Ehrlich, M. F. & Gyselinck, V. (1992). Levels of representation and domain-specific knowledge in comprehension of scientific texts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 335-351.
69. van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
70. van Kraayenoord, C. E. & Schneider, W. (1999). Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in grades 3 and 4. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 305-324.
71. Wang, J.H.-Y. & Guthrie, J.T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162-186.
72. Watkins, M. W. & Coffey, D. Y. (2004). Reading motivation: Multidimensional and indeterminate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 110-118.
73. Wigfield, A. & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420-432.