Where the progressive and the resultative meet: Imperfective aspect in Japanese, Chinese, Korean and English

Studies in Language

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 661-692

  Shirai, Yasuhiro ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989382369     PISSN: 03784177     EISSN: 15699978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sl.22.3.06shi     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ahn, Yoonja Oh. 1995.The aspectual and temporal systems of Korean from the perspective of the two-component theory of aspect.Austin: University of Texas dissertation.
2. Anderson, Lloyd B. 1982. “The ‘perfect’ as a universal and as a language-specific category”. In: Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics227-264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Bybee, Joan L; Revere Perkins; and William Pagliuca. 1994.The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Chafe, Wallace. 1980. “Consequential verbs in the Northern Iroquiois languages and elsewhere”. In: Kathryn Klar, Margaret Langdon and Shirley Silver (eds), American Indian and Indo-European studies: Papers in honor of Madison S. Beeler43-49. The Hague: Mouton.
5. Chen, Chung-yu. 1987. “Stemming from the verbal suffix -zhe”.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association22: 43-64.
6. Chu, Chauncey C. 1987. “The semantics, syntax, and pragmatics of the verbal suffix-zhe”. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association22: 1-41.
7. Comrie, Bernard. 1976.Aspect.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Comrie, Bernard. 1981. “Aspect and voice: Some reflections on perfect and passive”. In: Philip J. Tedeschi and Annie Zaenen (eds), Syntax and semantics, vol. 14: Tense and aspect191-212. New York: Academic Press.
9. Dowty, David R. 1979.Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague's PTQ.Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
10. Ebert, Karen H. 1995. “Ambiguous perfect-progressive forms across languages”. In: Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bianchi, Osten Dahl, and Mario Squartini (eds), Temporal reference, aspect and actionality. Vol. 2: Typological perspectives185-203. Torino: Rosenberg &Sellier.
11. Egerod, Soren. 1994. “Aspect in Chinese”. In: Carl Bache, Hans Basboll and Carl-Erik Lindberg (eds), Tense, aspect, and action: Empirical and theoretical contributions to language typology279-309. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Givón, Talmy. 1982. “Tense-aspect-modality: The Creole prototype and beyond”. In: Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics115-163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Hopper, Paul J. 1991. “On some principles of grammaticization” In: Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticali-zation, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues19-35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Jacobsen, W. M. 1982. “Vendler’s verb classes and the aspectual character of Japanesete iru”. In: Monica Macaulay et al. (eds), Proceedings of the eighth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society373-383. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
15. Jacobsen, W. M. 1992.The transitive structure of events in Japanese.Tokyo: Kuroshio.
16. Jaxontov, Sergej Je. 1983. “Resultatives in Chinese”. In: Vladimir P. Nedjal-kov (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions113-133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Kageyama, Taro. 1996.Doosi imiron[Verb semantics]. Tokyo: Kuroshio.
18. Kaneda, Akihiro. 1995. “Hoogen ni okeru bunpoo teki imi” [Grammatical meaning in dialects].Kokubungaku Kaisyaku to Kansyoo60(l):81-89.
19. Kim, Yookyung. 1993. “The resultative progressive in Korean”. In: Katherine Beals, Gina Cooke, David Kathman, Sotaro Kita, Karl-Erik McCullough and David Testen (eds)CLS 29: Papers from the main session251-258. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
20. Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1950. “Kokugo doosi no itibunrui” [A classification of Japanese verbs].Gengo Kenkyu15: 48-63.
21. Kinsui, Satoshi. 1995a. “Sinkoo-tai towa nanika” [What is the progressive?].Kokubungaku Kaisyaku to Kansyoo60 (7): 14-20.
22. Kinsui, Satoshi. 1995b. “Iwayuru ‘sinkoo-tai’ ni tuite” [On the so-called progressive]. In:Tukisima Hirosi hakase koki kinen kokugogaku ronsyuu169-197. Tokyo: Kyuko Shoin.
23. Kudo, Mayumi. 1983. “Uwazima hoogen no asupekuto” [Aspect in the Uwajima dialect].Kokubungaku Kaisyaku to Kansyoo48 (6): 101-119.
24. Kudo, Mayumi. 1989. “Gendai nihongo no paafekuto o megutte” [On the perfect in Modem Japanese]. In: Gengogaku Kenkyuukai (ed.)Kotoba no Kagaku 3:53-118. Tokyo: Mugi Shobo.
25. Kudo, Mayumi. 1995.Asupekuto/tensu taikee to tekusuto: Gendai nihongo no zikan no hyoogen[Aspect-tense system and text: Temporal expressions in Modem Japanese]. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.
26. Lee, Hyo Sang. 1991.Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective.Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.
27. Lee, Kee-Dong. 1978. “On the semantic nature of the auxiliaryiss-ta”. In: Pyong-Uk Chong, et al. (eds), Essays in commemorating the 60th anniversary ofNunmoe, Dr. WungHuh359-387. Cited in Lee (1991).
28. Lee, Kee-Dong. 1981. “A tense-aspect-modality system in Korean”.Aysan-hanpo1: 71-117.
29. Lee, Ki-Kap. 1981. “Ssikuth (-a)-wa (-ko)-uy yeksacek kyochey” [Historical replacement of -a with -ko in the verb-ending system of Korean]. In Y. Ko and K. Nam (eds), Kwukeuy thongsa uymilon317-329. Seoul: Tower Press. Cited in Sohn (1995).
30. Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995.Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981.Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar.Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Li, Ping. 1990.Aspect and aktionsart in child Mandarin.Leiden, Netherlands: University of Leiden dissertation.
33. Li, Ping. 1993. “The acquisition of thezaiandbaconstructions in Mandarin Chinese”. In: J.C.P. Liang and Rint P. E. Sybesma (eds), From classical FU to ‘Three inches high’: Studies on Chinese in honor of Erik ZUercher103-120. Leuven, Belgium: Garant Publishers.
34. Ma, Jing-hen S. 1985. “A study of the Mandarin suffixzhe’\ Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association20: 23-50.
35. Matsushita, Daizaburo. 1928.Kaisen hyoodyun nihon bunpoo[The revised and selected standard grammar of Japanese]. Tokyo: Chubunkan.
36. McClure, William. 1993. “A semantic parameter: The progressive in Japanese and English”. In: Soonja Choi (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, 3254-270. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
37. Mei, Tsu-lin. 1979. “The etymology of the aspect markertsiin the Wu dialect”.Journal of Chinese Linguistics7: 1-14.
38. Okuda, Yasuo. 1978a. “Asupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte, zyoo” [On the study of aspect, I].Kyooiku Kokugo53: 33-44.
39. Okuda, Yasuo. 1978b. “Asupekuto no kenkyuu o megutte, ge” [On the study of aspect, II].Kyooiku Kokugo54: 14-27.
40. Ono, Susumu. 1983. “Kotengo no zyodoosi to zyosi” [Auxiliaries and particles in Classical Japanese].Kokubungaku Kaisyaku to Kansyoo48 (2): 5-65.
41. Perlmutter, David M. 1978. “Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis”. In: Jeri J. Jaeger et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society157-189. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
42. Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1993. “Inherent aspect and the acquisition of tense/aspect morphology in Japanese”. In: Heizo Nakajima and Yukio Otsu (eds), Argument structure: Its syntax and acquisition185-211. Tokyo: Kaita-kusha.
43. Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1996. “Does accomplishment always have duration? The Dowty-Van Valin system vs. the Smith system of inherent aspect”. In: Lise M. Dobrin, Kora Singer and Lisa McNair (eds), CLS 32: Papers from the main session335-345. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
44. Smith, Carlota S. 1983. “A theory of aspectual choice”.Language59: 479-501.
45. Smith, Carlota S. 1991.The parameter of aspect.Dordrecht: Kluwer.
46. Smith, Carlota S. and Richard M. Weist. 1987. “On the temporal contour of child language: A reply to Rispoli &Bloom”.Journal of Child Language14: 387-392.
47. Sohn, Sung-Ock S. 1995.Tense and aspect in Korean.Honolulu, HI: Center for Korean Studies.
48. Takezawa, Koichi. 1991. “Dyudoobun, nookakubun, bunri hukanoo syoyuu-koobun to teiru no kaisyaku” [Passives, ergatives, and inalienable possession sentences in the interpretation ofteiru]. In: Yoshio Nitta (ed.), Nihongo no voisu to tadoosei59-81. Tokyo: Kuroshio.
49. Talmy, Leonard. 1985. “Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms”. In: Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic descriptionIII: Grammatical categories and the lexicon57-149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Tenny, Carol. 1994.Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface.Dordrecht: Kluwer.
51. Tsuboi, Yoshiki. 1976. “Kinsei note irutote aru”[teiruandtearuin PreModem Japanese]. In:Saeki Umetomo hakase kizyu kinen kokugogaku ronsyuu, 537-560. Tokyo: Hyogensha.
52. Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1993. “A synopsis of role and reference grammar”. In: Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar1-164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
53. Vendler, Zeno. 1957. “Verbs and times”.The Philosophical Review66: 143-160. [Reprinted in Vender (1967)].
54. Vendler, Zeno. 1967.Linguistics in philosophy.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
55. Yanagida, Seiji. 1991.Muromati zidaigo siryoo ni yoru kihon gosi no kenkyuu[A study of basic language based on materials from the Muromachi Era]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin.
56. Yeh, Meng. 1993. “The Stative situation and the imperfective zhe in Mandarin”.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association28: 69-98.
57. Yoshikawa, Taketoki. 1976. “Gendai nihongo doosi no asupekuto no kenkyuu” [Research on the aspect of verbs in Modem Japanese]. In: Haruhiko Kindaichi (ed.), Nihongo doosi no asupekuto155-328. Tokyo: Mugi Shobo.