Orthographic Neighbours are not all Equal: Evidence using an Identification Technique

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 77-90

  Perea, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032326275     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/016909698386609     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bavelier, D., Prasada, S., & Segui, J. (1994). Repetition blindness between words: Nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1437-1455.
2. Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighbourhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 857-871.
3. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J.F., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates Inc.
4. Estes, W.K., Allmeyer, D.H., & Reder, S.M. (1976). Serial position functions of letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 1-15.
5. Evett, L.J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 325-350.
6. Forster, K.I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R.J. Wales & Walker (Eds), New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
7. Forster, K.I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
8. Forster, K.I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 696-713.
9. Gernsbacher, M.A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.
10. Grainger, J. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In R. Frost & L. Kast (Eds), Orthography, morphology, and meaning. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
11. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
12. Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.
13. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J.K., Jacobs, A.M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
14. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J.K., Jacobs, A.M., & Segui, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 49-56.
15. Havens, L.L., & Foote, W.E. (1963). The effect of competition on visual duration thresholds and its independence of stimulus frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 6-11.
16. Hochhaus, L., & Marohn, K. (1991). Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individuation failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 422-432.
17. Humphreys, G.W., Besner, D., & Quinlan, P.T. (1988). Event perception and the word repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 51-67.
18. Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L.J., & Quinlan, P.T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
19. Huntsman, L.A., & Lima, S.D. (1996). Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 417-429.
20. Jordan, T.R. (1990). Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over singles letters and influence of postmark boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 891-909.
21. Kučera, H., & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
22. McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
23. McClusker, L.X., Gough, P.B., & Bias, R.G. (1981). Word recognition inside out and outside in. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 538-551.
24. O'Regan, J.K. (1990). Eye movements in reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25. Paap, K.R., Newsome, S.L., McDonald, J.E., & Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
26. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 500-519.
27. Perea, M. (1993). Influencia de los factores de vecindad sobre el acceso léxico: Análisis experimentales y de simulación. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitat de València.
28. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (submitted). Los vecinos ortográficos no son iguales: Evidencia con la técnica de presentación enmascarada del estímulo-señal.
29. Perea, M., & Gotor, A. (1994) Las palabras vecinas deben ponderarse: Evidencia mediante la ceguera perceptual. Cognitiva, 6, 123-132.
30. Perea, M., & Pollatsek, A. (in press). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
31. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 785-794.
32. Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
33. Sears, C.R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S.J. (1995). Neighbourhood frequency and neighbourhood size effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 876-900.
34. Segui, J. & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65-76.