Implications of design assumptions on capacity estimates and demand predictions of multispan curved bridges

Journal of Bridge Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 710-726

  Mwafy, Aman ^a,b   Elnashai, Amr ^a,c   Yen, W H ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b ZAGAZIG UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^c Dep of Civil Engineering   (United States)

^d R and D Fedral Highway Administration   (United States)

Author keywords

Bearings; Bridges, continuous; Bridges, spans; Curvature; Earthquake loads; Friction resistance; Nonlinear analysis; Three dimensional models

Indexed keywords

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATIONS; MULTISPAN CURVED BRIDGES; STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCIES; THREE DIMENSIONAL MODELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SEISMIC PROSPECTING;

BRIDGES;

EID: 35348887735     PISSN: 10840702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:6(710)     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1995). Standard specifications for highway bridges, 15th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
2. Antoniou, S., and Pinho, R. (2004). " Advantages and limitations of adaptive and nonadaptive force-based pushover procedures.. " J. Earthquake Eng., 8 (4), 497-522.
3. Bondonet, G., and Filiatrault, A. (1997). " Frictional response of PTFE sliding bearings at high frequencies.. " J. Bridge Eng., 2 (4), 139-148.
4. California Dept. of Transportation (Caltrans). (2004). Caltrans seismic design criteria, Sacramento, Calif.
5. Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B. (2004). " Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.. " Eng. Struct., 26, 187-199.
6. Constantinou, M., Mokha, A., and Reinhorn, A. (1990). " Teflon bearings in base isolation. II: Modeling.. " J. Struct. Eng., 116 (2), 455-474.
7. EC8. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions, and rules for buildings. Part 2: Bridges, CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
8. Elnashai, A. S. (2001). " Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications.. " J. Struct. Engrg. & Mech., 12 (1), 51-69.
9. Elnashai, A. S. (2002). " Do we really need inelastic dynamic analysis? " J. Earthquake Eng., 6 (Special Issue 1), 123-130.
10. Elnashai, A. S., and Mwafy, A. M. (2002). " Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced-concrete buildings.. " Struct. Des. Tall Build., 11 (5), 329-351.
11. Elnashai, A. S., Papanikolaou, V., and Lee, D. (2004). ZEUS-NL: A system for inelastic analysis of structures, user's manual, Mid-America Earthquake Center, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
12. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures (FEMA 450), Washington, D.C.
13. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1996). Seismic design of bridges: Design example no. 5: Nine-span viaduct steel girder bridge, Publication No. FHWA-SA-97-010, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
14. Housner, G. (1952). " Spectrum intensities of strong-motion earthquakes.. " Symp. on Earthquake and Blast Effects on Structures, Los Angeles, 20-36.
15. Jeong, S.-H., and Elnashai, A. S. (2005). " Analytical assessment of an irregular RC frame for full-scale 3D pseudodynamic testing. Part I: Analytical model verification.. " J. Earthquake Eng., 9 (1), 95-128.
16. Lu, Z., Ge, H., and Usami, T. (2004). " Applicability of pushover analysis-based seismic performance evaluation procedure for steel arch bridges.. " Eng. Struct., 26 (13), 1957-1977.
17. Maroney, B. H. (1995). " Large-scale bridge abutment tests to determine stiffness and ultimate strength under seismic loading.. " Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, Davis.
18. Muthukumar, S., and DesRoches, R. (2006). " A Hertz contact model with nonlinear damping for pounding simulation.. " Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35 (7), 811-828.
19. Mwafy, A. M., and Elnashai, A. S. (2001). " Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings.. " Eng. Struct., 23 (5), 407-424.
20. Mwafy, A. M., and Elnashai, A. S. (2002). " Calibration of force reduction factors of RC buildings.. " J. Earthquake Eng., 6 (2), 239-273.
21. Mwafy, A. M., Elnashai, A. S., Sigbjörnsson, R., and Salama, A. (2005). " Significance of severe distant and moderate close earthquakes on design and behavior of tall buildings.. " Struct. design of tall and special buildings, in press.
22. NCHRP 12-49. (2001). Comprehensive specification for the seismic design of bridges, Revised LRFD Design Specifications. Part 1: Specifications, Part 2: Commentary and Appendices, MCEER Publications, Univ. of Buffalo, Buffalo.
23. Paraskeva, T. S., Kappos, A. J., and Sextos, A. G. (2006). " Extension of modal pushover analysis to seismic assessment of bridges.. " Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35, 1269-1293.
24. Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges, Wiley, New York.
25. Rix, G. J., Fernandez, A., and Foutch, D. A. (2004). " Synthetic earthquake hazard.. " Project HD-1, Mid-America Earthquake Center,〈 http://mae.cee.uiuc.edu 〉 (January 31, 2006).
26. Rossetto, T., and Elnashai, A. S. (2005). " A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures.. " Eng. Struct., 27 (3), 397-409.
27. SAP2000. (2003). " Structural analysis program.. " Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, Calif.
28. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2002). " Seismic hazard maps for the conterminous U.S. for 2002.. " USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, 〈 http://earthquake.usgs.gov 〉 (January 31, 2006).
29. Zheng, Y., Usami, T., and Ge, H. (2003). " Seismic response predictions of multispan steel bridges through pushover analysis.. " Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32 (8), 1259-1274.