Cepstral estimation of arterial input functions in brain perfusion imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 773-779

  Grüner, Renate ^a,b   Taxt, Torfinn ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Blind deconvolution; Dynamic contrast susceptibility imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perfusion imaging; Voxel specific arterial input function

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ARTICLE; BLIND DECONVOLUTION; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN PERFUSION; COMPLEX CEPSTRUM LIFTERING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISPERSION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; STROKE; SYNTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; ALGORITHM; ARTERY; BRAIN; BRAIN CIRCULATION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PERFUSION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ALGORITHMS; ARTERIES; BRAIN; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PERFUSION; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 35248883454     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21115     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Guckel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193:637-641.
2. Barbier EL, Lamalle L, Decorps M. Methodology of brain perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:496-520.
3. Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715-725.
4. Wu O, Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Benner T, Rosen BR, Sorensen AG. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164-174.
5. Salluzzi M, Frayne R, Smith MR. An alternative viewpoint of the similarities and differences of SVD and FT deconvolution algorithms used for quantitative MR perfusion studies. Magn Reson Imaging 2005;23:481-492.
6. Calamante F, Yim PJ, Cebral JR. Estimation of bolus dispersion effects in perfusion MRI using image-based computational fluid dynamics. Neuroimage 2003;19:341-353.
7. Calamante F, Moerup M, Hansen KL. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:789-797.
8. Calamante F. Bolus dispersion issues related to the quantification of perfusion MRI data. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:718-722.
9. Grüner R, Bjornara BT, Moen G, Taxt T. Magnetic resonance brain perfusion imaging with voxel-specific arterial input functions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23:273-786.
10. Grüner R, Taxt T. Iterative blind deconvolution in magnetic resonance brain perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:805-815.
11. Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW. Discrete-time signal processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1989. p 768-845.
12. McLachlan GJ, Krishnan T. The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997. 274 p.
13. McCallum BC. Blind deconvolution by simulated annealing. Optics Commun 1990;75:101-105.