Elementary and middle school student participation in gifted programs: Are gifted students underserved?

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 118-129

  Swiatek, Mary Ann ^a   Lupkowski Shoplik, Ann ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444433641     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698620304700203     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baska, L. K. (1989). Characteristics and needs of the gifted. In J. Feldhusen, J. VanTassel-Baska, & K. Seeley (Eds.), Excellence in educating the gifted (pp. 15-28). Denver: Love.
2. Broussard, C. A., & Joseph, A. L. (1998). Tracking: A form of educational neglect? Social Work in Education, 20, 110-120.
3. Carnegie Mellon Institute for Talented Elementary Students (C-MITES). (1999). Carnegie Mellon 1999 Elementary Student Talent Search: Registration information. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
4. Carnegie Mellon Institute for Talented Elementary Students (C-MITES). (2000). Carnegie Mellon 2000 Elementary Student Talent Search: Registration information. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Coleman, J. M., & Fults, B. A. (1982). Self-concept and the gifted classroom: The role of social comparisons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 116-120.
7. Coleman, J. M., & Fults, B. A. (1985). Special-class placement, level of intelligence, and the self-concepts of gifted children: A social comparison perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 6(1), 7-11.
8. Cox, J., Daniel, N., & Boston, B. O. (1985). Educating able learners: Programs and promising practices. Austin: University of Texas Press.
9. Feldhusen, J. F. (1989). Why the public schools will continue to neglect the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 12(2), 55-59.
10. Feldhusen, J. F. (1997). Secondary services, opportunities, and activities for talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 189-197). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
11. Gross, M. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11, 189-194.
12. Gross, M. U. M. (1994). Radical acceleration: Responding to academic and social needs of extremely gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5(4), 27-34.
13. Hoge, R. D., & McSheffrey, R. (1991). An investigation of self-concept in gifted children. Exceptional Children, 57, 238-245.
14. Hoge, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63, 449-465.
15. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1997). Ability grouping. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 230-242). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
16. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1994). The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth: The first three decades of a planned 50-year study of intellectual talent. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 255-281). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A, Benbow, C. P., Assouline, S. G., & Brody, L. E. (2003). Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 204-218). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18. Mallery, J. L., & Mallery, J. G. (1999). The American legacy of ability grouping: Tracking reconsidered. Multicultural Education, 7, 13-15.
19. McPartland, J. M., Coldiron, J. R., & Braddock, J. H. (1987). School structures and classroom practices in elementary, middle, and secondary schools. Baltimore: Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, Johns Hopkins University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 291 703).
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
21. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1989). Development of academic talent: The role of summer programs. In J. VanTassel-Baska & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners: The home, the self, and the school (pp. 214-230). New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1997). Special summer and Saturday programs for gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 180-188). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
24. Pennsylvania Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education. (1995). Guidelines: Education of mentally gifted students. Harrisburg, PA: Author.
25. Pennsylvania Department of Education (2001). Rules and regulations, Title 22 - Education, State Board of Education [22 PA. CODE CHS. 14, 16 AND 342]: Gifted Education; Special Education Services and Programs. Retrieved February 21, 2003, from http://www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol30/3050/2124.html.
26. Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (1997). Enrichment and acceleration: An overview and new directions. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 113-125). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
27. Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Are cooperative learning and "untracking" harmful to the gifted? Response to Allan. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 68-71.
29. Slavin, R. E. (1993). Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 535-552.
30. Southern, W. T., & Jones, E. D. (1991). Academic acceleration: Background and issues. In W. T. Southern & E. D. Jones (Eds.), The academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 1-28). New York: Teachers College Press.
31. Southern, W. T., & Jones, E. D. (1992). The real problems with academic acceleration. Gifted Child Today, 15(2), 34-38.
32. Southern, W. T., Jones, E. D., & Fiscus, E. D. (1989). Practitioner objections to the academic acceleration of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 29-35.
33. Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 361-387). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Stephens, K. R., & Karnes, F. A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented, revisited. Exceptional Children, 66, 219-238.
35. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 359 743).
36. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1991). Identification of candidates for academic acceleration: Issues and concerns. In W. T. Southern & E. D. Jones (Eds.), The academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 148-161). New York: Teachers College Press.
37. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1996). Contributions of the talent-search concept to gifted education. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent (pp. 236-245). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Winner, E. (1997). Exceptionally high intelligence and schooling. American Psychologist, 52, 1070-1081.
39. Winner, E. (2000). Giftedness: Current theory and research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 153-156.