Temporal stability of auditory event-related potentials in healthy individuals and patients with traumatic brain injury

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 392-397

  Lew, Henry L ^a,b   Gray, Max ^a   Poole, John H ^a  

^a VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b PM and R   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain injury; Event Related Potentials; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN INJURIES; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34948816631     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31814a56e3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barnes VA, Johnson MH, Treiber FA. Temporal stability of twenty-four-hour ambulatory hemodynamic bioimpedance measures in African American adolescents. Blood Press Monit 2004;9:173-177.
2. Comas A, Gonzalez-Nuevo JP, Plaza F, et al. [The evaluation of the hypertensive patient via self-measured blood pressure at home]. Aten Primaria 1998;22:142-148.
3. Debener S, Kranczioch C, Herrmann CS, Engel AK. Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention. Int J Psychophysiol 2002;46:77-84.
4. Duzel E, Vargha-Khadem F, Heinze HJ, Mishkin M. Brain activity evidence for recognition without recollection after early hippocampal damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:8101-8106.
5. Fallgatter AJ. Electrophysiology of the prefrontal cortex in healthy controls and schizophrenic patients: a review. J Neural Transm 2001;108:679-694.
6. Ford JM, Gray M, Whitfield SL, et al. Acquiring and inhibiting prepotent responses in schizophrenia: event-related brain potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;61:119-129.
7. Fowler B, Mitchell I. Biological determinants of P300: the effects of a barbiturate on latency and amplitude. Biol Psychol 1997;46:113-124.
8. Giaquinto S. Evoked potentials in rehabilitation: a review. Funct Neurol 2004;19:219-225.
9. Glenn S, Parsons OA, Sinha R. Assessment of recovery of electrophysiological and neuropsychological functions in chronic alcoholics. Biol Psychiatry 1994;36:443-452.
10. Hummel T, Haenel T, Hull D. Assessment of pharyngeal sensitivity to mechanical stimuli using psychophysical and electrophysiological techniques. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2002;15:321-325.
11. Kiehl KA, Hare RD, Liddle PF, McDonald JJ. Reduced P300 responses in criminal psychopaths during a visual oddball task. Biol Psychiatry 1999;45:1498-1507.
12. Kileny PR, Kripal JP. Test-retest variability of auditory event-related potentials. Ear Hear 1987;8:110-114.
13. Knight RT, Scabini D, Woods DL, Clayworth CC. Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3. Brain Res 1989;502:109-116.
14. Lew HL, Dikmen S, Slimp J, et al. Use of somatosensory-evoked potentials and cognitive event-related potentials in predicting outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:53-61.
15. Lew HL, Lee EH, Pan SS, Date ES. Electrophysiologic abnormalities of auditory and visual information processing in patients with traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83:428-433.
16. Lew HL. Evoked Potentials: Preface. In: Lew HL, Kraft GH, editors. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America: Evoked Potentials. February 2004, Volume 15, Number 1 ed. Elsevier Saunders;2004. p. xiii-xiv.
17. Lew HL, Poole JH, Chiang JY, et al. Event-related potential in facial affect recognition: potential clinical utility in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:29-34.
18. Mathalon DH, Ford JM, Pfefferbaum A. Trait and state aspects of P300 amplitude reduction in schizophrenia: a retrospective longitudinal study. Biol Psychiatry 2000;47:434-449.
19. Naatanen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987;24:375-425.
20. Naatanen R. Mismatch negativity: clinical research and possible applications. Int J Psychophysiol 2003;48:179-188.
21. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Cohen JD. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. Psychophysiology 2004;41:157-160.
22. Nuwer MR. Fundamentals of evoked potentials and common clinical applications today. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;106:142-148.
23. Oades RD, Dittmann-Balcar A, Zerbin D. The topography of 4 subtraction ERP-waveforms derived from a 3-tone auditory oddball task in healthy young adults. Int J Neurosci 1995;81:265-281.
24. Pekkonen E, Rinne T, Naatanen R. Variability and replicability of the mismatch negativity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;96:546-554.
25. Picton TW, Bentin S, Berg P, et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 2000;37:127-152.
26. Polich J, Margala C. P300 and probability: comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms. Int J Psychophysiol 1997;25:169-176.
27. Raikkonen K, Birkas E, Horvath J, et al. Test-retest reliability of auditory ERP components in healthy 6-year-old children. Neuroreport 2003;14:2121-2125.
28. Ramchandani VA, O'Connor S, Blekher T, et al. A preliminary study of acute responses to clamped alcohol concentration and family history of alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999;23:1320-1330.
29. Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Tirschwell DL, Lew HL. Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma. Crit Care Med 2003;31:960-967.
30. Segalowitz SJ, Dywan J, Unsal A. Attentional factors in response time variability after traumatic brain injury: an ERP study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997;3:95-107.
31. Sinha R, Bernardy N, Parsons OA. Long-term test-retest reliability of event-related potentials in normals and alcoholics. Biol Psychiatry 1992;32:992-1003.
32. Spikman JM, van der Naalt J, Van Weerden, TW Van Zomeren, AH. Indices of slowness of information processing in head injury patients: tests for selective attention related to ERP latencies. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2004;10:851-861.
33. Swerdlow NR, Stephany NL, Talledo J, et al. Prepulse inhibition of perceived stimulus intensity: paradigm assessment. Biol Psychol 2005;69:133-147.
34. Thesen T, Murphy C. Reliability analysis of event-related brain potentials to olfactory stimuli. Psychophysiology 2002;39:733-738.
35. Walhovd KB, Fjell AM. One-year test-retest reliability of auditory ERPs in young and old adults. Int J Psychophysiol 2002;46:29-40.
36. Wambacq I, Abubakr A. Auditory event-related potentials (P300) in the identification of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2004;5:503-508.
37. Williams LM, Simms E, Clark CR, et al. The test-retest reliability of a standardized neurocognitive and neurophysiological test battery: 'neuromarker.' Int J Neurosci 2005;115:1605-1630.
38. Woods DL, Elmasian R. The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986;65: 447-459.