Use of somatosensory-evoked potentials and cognitive event-related potentials in predicting outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 53-61

  Lew, Henry L ^a,d   Dikmen, Sureyya ^b   Slimp, Jefferson ^b   Temkin, Nancy ^b   Lee, Eun Ha ^a   Newell, David ^c   Robinson, Lawrence R ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Functional outcome; Glasgow coma scale; Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended; N100; P300; Somatosensory evoked potential; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; FUNCTIONAL NEURAL STIMULATION; PATIENT MONITORING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BRAIN INJURY PATIENTS;

BRAIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; COMA; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDIAN NERVE; PREDICTION; PROGNOSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH; WAVEFORM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; MEDIAN NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPEECH; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0347297497     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200301000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kraus JF, McArthur DL: Epidemiologic aspects of brain injury. Neurol Clin 1996;14:435-50
2. Ashley MJ, Persel CS, Clark MC, et al: Long-term follow-up of post-acute traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A statistical analysis to test for stability and predictability of outcome. Brain Inj 1997;11:677-90
3. Houlden DA, Li C, Schwartz ML, et al: Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the Glasgow Coma Scale as predictors of outcome in comatose patients with head injuries. Neurosurgery 1990;27:701-8
4. Beca J, Cox PN, Taylor MJ, et al: Somatosensory evoked potentials for prediction of outcome in acute severe brain injury. J Pediatr 1995;126:44-9
5. Claassen J, Hansen HC: Early recovery after closed traumatic head injury: Somatosensory evoked potentials and clinical findings. Crit Care Med 2001;29:494-502
6. Sleigh JW, Havill JH, Frith R, et al: Somatosensory evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury: A blinded study. J Neurosurg 1999;91:577-80
7. Mazzini L, Pisano F, Zaccala M, et al: Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials at different stages of recovery from severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:33-9
8. Chen R, Bolton CF, Young B: Prediction of outcome in patients with anoxic coma: A clinical and electrophysiologic study. Crit Care Med 1996;24:672-8
9. Kane NM, Curry SH, Rowlands CA, et al: Event-related potentials-neurophysiological tools for predicting emergence and early outcome form traumatic coma. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:39-46
10. Rappaport M, McCandless KL, Pond W, et al: Passive P300 response in traumatic brain injury patients. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1991;3:180-5
11. Yingling CD, Hosobuchi Y, Harrington M: P300 as a predictor of recovery from coma. Lancet 1990;336:873
12. O'Mahony D, Rowan M, Walsh JB, et al: P300 response as a predictor of recovery from coma (letter). Lancet 1990;336:1265-6
13. Mazzini L, Zaccala M, Gareri F, et al: Long-latency auditory-evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:57-65
14. Lew HL, Slimp J, Price R, et al: Comparison of speech-evoked versus tone-evoked P300 response: Implications for predicting outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999;78:367-71
15. Lew HL, Chen CPC, Chen MJL, et al: Comparing the effects of different speech targets on cognitive event-related potentials: Theoretical implication for predicting outcomes in patients with brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:524-7
16. Polich J: P300 from a passive auditory paradigm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989;74:312-20
17. Wayman JW, Frisina RD, Walton JP, et al: Effects of musical training and absolute pitch ability on event-related activity in response to sine tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;91:3527-31
18. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM: Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:573-85
19. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM: Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:204-9
20. Zwaagstra R, Achmidt I, Vanier M: Recovery of speed of information processing in closed-head-injury patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1996;18:383-93
21. Fowler B, Mitchell I: Biological determinants of P300: The effects of barbiturate on latency and amplitude. Biol Psychol 1997;46:113-24
22. Nishimura N, Ogura C, Ohta I: Effects of the dopamine-related drug bromocriptine on event-related potentials and its relation to the law of initial value. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1995;49:79-86
23. Jennett B, Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975;7905:480-4
24. Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, et al: Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: Coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:118-23
25. Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, et al: Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: A review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:587-97
26. Guerit JM, Verougstraete D, de Tourtchaninoff M, et al: ERPs obtained with the auditory oddball paradigm in coma and altered states of consciousness: Clinical relationships, prognostic value, and origin of components. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:1260-9
27. Fioretto M, Gandolfo E, Orione C, et al: Automatic perimetry and visual P300: Differences between upper and lower visual fields stimulation in healthy subjects. J Med Eng Technol 1995;19:80-3
28. Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Wenegrat BG, et al: Clinical application of P3 component of event-related potentials: I. Normal aging. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984;59:85-103
29. Lew H, Chmiel R, Jerger J, et al: Electrophysiologic indices of Stroop and Garner interference reveal linguistic influences on auditory and visual processing. J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8:104-18
30. Greenberg RP, Ducker TB: Evoked potentials in the clinical neurosciences. J Neurosurg 1982;56:1-18
31. McCullagh S, Oucherlony D, Protzner A, et al: Prediction of neuropsychiatric outcome following mild trauma brain injury: An examination of the Glasgow Coma Scale. Brain Inj 2001;15:489-97
32. Zafonte RD, Hammond FM, Mann NR, et al: Relationship between Glasgow Coma Scale and functional outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:364-9