Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 77-84

  Debener, S ^a   Kranczioch, C ^a   Herrmann, C S ^b   Engel, A K ^a  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Bottom up; Habituation; Novelty P3; Reliability; Target P3; Top down

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RECORDING; RELIABILITY; SOUND; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0036791886     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00072-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Beauducel A., Debener S., Brocke B., Kayser J. On the reliability of augmenting/reducing. Peak amplitudes and principal components analysis of auditory evoked potentials. J. Psychophysiol. 14:2000;226-240.
2. Carrillo-de-la-Pena M.T., Garcia-Larrea L. On the validity of interblock averaging of P300 clinical settings. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 34:1999;103-112.
3. Courchesne E., Hillyard S.A., Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance, and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 39:1975;131-141.
4. Cycowicz Y.M., Friedman D., Rothstein M. A developmental study of the effect of temporal order on the ERPs elicited by novel environmental sounds. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 103:1996;304-318.
5. Daffner K.R., Mesulam M.M., Scinto L.F.M., et al. The central role of the prefrontal cortex in directing attention to novel events. Brain. 123:2000;927-939.
6. Debener S., Beauducel A., Nessler D., Brocke B., Heilemann H., Kayser J. Is resting anterior EEG alpha asymmetry a trait marker for depression? Neuropsychobiology. 41:2000;31-37.
7. Donchin E., Spencer K.M., Dien J. The varieties of deviant experience: ERP manifestations of deviance processors. van Boxtel G.J.M., Bocker K.B.E., Brain and Behaviour: Past, Present, and Future. 1997;67-91 University Press, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
8. Fabiani M., Friedman D. Changes in brain activity patterns and aging: the novelty oddball. Psychophysiology. 32:1995;579-594.
9. Friedman D., Simpson G. Amplitude and scalp distribution of target and novel events: effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults. Cogn. Brain Res. 2:1994;49-63.
10. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Gatea H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25:2001;355-373.
11. Herrmann C.S., Knight R.T. Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25:2001;465-476.
12. Humphreys G.W., Duncan J., Treisman A. Attention, Space, and Action. Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience. first ed. 1999;University Press, Oxford.
13. Ivey R.G., Schmidt H.B. P300 response: habituation. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 4:1993;182-188.
14. Kayser J., Tenke C.E., Bhattacharya N., Stuart B.K., Hudson J., Bruder G.E. Direct comparison of geodesic sensor net (128-channel) and conventional (30-channel) ERPs in tonal and phonetic oddball tasks. Psychophysiology. 37:2000;S17.
15. Kinoshita S., Inoue M., Maeda H., Nakamura J., Morita K. Long-term patterns of change in ERPs across repeated measurements. Physiol. Behav. 60:1996;1087-1092.
16. Knight R.T. Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 59:1984;9-20.
17. Lammers W.J., Badia P. Habituation of P300 to target stimuli. Physiol. Behav. 45:1989;595-601.
18. Luu P., Ferree T. Determination of the Geodesic Sensor Nets' Average Electrode Positions and their 10-10 International Equivalents. 2000;1-11 Electrical Geodesics, Inc, Eugene, Oregon.
19. Nunez P.L., Silberstein R.B. On the relationship of synaptic activity to macroscopic measurements: does co-registration of EEG with fMRI make sense? Brain Topogr. 13:2000;79-96.
20. Oken B.S., Chiappa K.H. Statistical issues concerning computerized analysis of brainwave topography. Annals Neurol. 19:1986;493-494.
21. Opitz B., Mecklinger A., Frederici A.D., von Cramon D.Y. The functional neuroanatomy of novelty processing: integrating ERP and fMRI results. Cereb. Cortex. 9:1999;379-391.
22. Pan J., Takeshita T., Morimoto K. P300 habituation from auditory single-stimulus and oddball paradigms. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 37:2000;149-153.
23. Polich J., McIsaac H.K. Comparison of auditory P300 habituation from active and passive conditions. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 17:1994;25-34.
24. Ravden D., Polich J. Habituation of P300 from visual stimuli. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 30:1998;359-365.
25. Romero R., Polich J. P3(00) habituation from auditory and visual stimuli. Physiol. Behav. 59:1996;517-522.
26. Simons R.F., Graham F.K., Miles M.A., Chen X. On the relationship of P3a and the novelty-P3. Biol. Psychol. 56:2001;207-218.
27. Sokolov E.N. Perception and the Conditioned Reflex. 1963;Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
28. Tucker D.M. Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96:1993;538-545.