Reliability analysis of event-related brain potentials to olfactory stimuli

Psychophysiology

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 733-738

  Thesen, Thomas ^a   Murphy, Claire ^a,b,c  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Olfaction; Olfactory event related potential (OERP); Reliability; Smell

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SMELLING; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 0036868987     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.3960733     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barz, S., Hummel, T., Pauli, E., Majer, M., Lang, C. J., & Kobal, G. (1997). Chemosensory event-related potentials in response to trigeminal and olfactory stimulation in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Neurology, 49, 1424-1431.
2. Beydoun, A., Morrow, T. J., Shen, J. F., & Casey, K. L. (1993). Variability of laser-evoked potentials: Attention, arousal and lateralized differences. Electroencephalography, & Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 173-181.
3. Carrillo-De-La-Pena, M. T. (2001). One-year test-retest reliability of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) to tones of increasing intensity. Psychophysiology, 38, 417-424.
4. Cometto-Muniz, J. E., & Cain, W. S. (1991). Nasal pungency, odor, and eye irritation thresholds for homologous acetates. Pharmacology & Biochemistry of Behavior, 39, 983-989.
5. Doty, R. L., McKeown, D. A., Lee, W. W., & Shaman, P. (1995). A study of the test-retest reliability of ten olfactory tests. Chemical Senses, 20, 645-656.
6. Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., Karis, D., & Donchin, E. (1987). Definition, identification, and reliability of measurement of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in Psychophysiology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-78). London: JAI Press.
7. Geisler, M. W., Morgan, C. D., Covington, J. W., & Murphy, C. (1999). Neuropsychological performance and cognitive olfactory event-related brain potentials in young and elderly adults. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropschology, 21, 108-126.
8. Geisler, M. W., & Murphy, C. (2000). Event-related brain potentials to attended and ignored olfactory and trigeminal stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 37, 309-315.
9. Geisler, M. W., Schlotfeldt, C. R., Middleton, C. B., Dulay, M. F., & Murphy, C. (1999). Traumatic brain injury assessed with olfactory event-related brain potentials. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 16, 77-86.
10. Green, B. G., Dalton, P., Cowart, B., Shaffer, G., Rankin, K., & Higgins, J. (1996). Evaluating the "labeled magnitude scale" for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chemical Senses, 21, 323-334.
11. Hall, R. A., Rappaport, M., Hopkins, H. K., & Griffin, R. B. (1973). Peak identification in visual evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 10, 52-60.
12. Heilmann, S., & Hummel, T. (2001). Olfactory event-related potentials to ortho- and retronasal stimulation (abstract). Chemical Senses, 26, 1086.
13. Kobal, G. (1981). Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen des Menschlichen Geruchsinnes. Stuttgart: Thieme.
14. Kobal, G., & Hummel, T. (1991). Olfactory evoked potentials in humans. In T. V. Getchell, R. L. Doty, L. M. Bartoshuk, & J. B. Snow (Eds.), Smell and Taste in Health and Disease (pp. 255-275). New York: Raven Press.
15. Krauel, K., Pause, B. M., Sojka, B., Schott, P., & Ferstl, R. (1998). Attentional modulation of central odor processing. Chemical Senses, 23, 423-432.
16. Lorig, T. S. (2000). The application of electroencephalographic techniques to the study of human olfaction: A review and tutorial. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36, 91-104.
17. Lorig, T. S., Maria, D. C., Peszka, J., & Bryant, D. N. (1996). The effects of active and passive stimulation on chemosensory event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 199-205.
18. Loveless, N. E., & Sanford, A. J. (1974). Effects of age on the contingent negative variation and preparatory set in a reaction-time task. Journal of Gerontology, 29, 52-63.
19. Morgan, C. D., Covington, J. W., Geisler, M. W., Polich, J., & Murphy, C. (1997). Olfactory event-related potentials: Older males demonstrate the greatest deficits. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 104, 351-358.
20. Morgan, C. D., Geisler, M. W., Covington, J. W., Polich, J., & Murphy, C. (1999). Olfactory P3 in young and older adults. Psychophysiology, 36, 281-287.
21. Murphy, C., Morgan, C. D., Geisler M. W., Wetter, S., Covington, J. W., Madowitz, M. D., Nordin, S., Polich, J. P. (2000). Olfactory event-related potentials and aging: Normative data. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36, 133-145.
22. Murphy, C., Nordin, S., de Wijk, R. A., Cain, W. S., & Polich, J. (1994). Olfactory-evoked potentials: Assessment of young and elderly, and comparison to psychophysical threshold. Chemical Senses, 19, 47-56.
23. Pause, B. M., & Krauel, K. (2000). Chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERP) as a key to the psychology of odors. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36, 105-122.
24. Pause, B. M., Krauel, K., Sojka, B., & Ferstl, R. (1998). Body odor evoked potentials: A new method to study the chemosensory perception of self and non-self in humans. Genetica, 104, 285-294.
25. Pause, B. M., Sojka, B., Krauel, K., & Ferstl, R. (1996). The nature of the late positive complex within the olfactory event-related potential (OERP). Psychophysiology, 33, 376-384.
26. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., Jr., Miller, G. A., Ritter, W., Ruchkin, D. S., Rugg, M. D., & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
27. Polich, J., & Heine, M. R. D. (1996). P300 topography and modality effects from a single-stimulus paradigm. Psychophysiology, 33, 747-757.
28. Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology, 37, 257-261.
29. Segalowitz, S. J., & Barnes, K. L. (1993). The reliability of ERP components in the auditory oddball paradigm. Psychophysiology, 30, 451-459.
30. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
31. Stecker, M. M., & Patterson, T. (1999). Electrode impedance in neurophysiologic recordings: Effects on recorded signals. American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology, 39, 148-164.
32. Tateyama, T., Hummel, T., Roscher, S., Post, H., & Kobal, G. (1998). Relation of olfactory event-related potentials to changes in stimulus concentration. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 108, 449-455.
33. Thesen, T., & Murphy, C. (2001). Age-related changes in olfactory processing detected with olfactory event-related brain potentials using velopharyngeal closure and natural breathing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 119-127.
34. Wetter, S., & Murphy, C. (1999). Individuals with Down's syndrome demonstrate abnormal olfactory event-related potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 1563-1569.
35. Wetter, S., & Murphy, C. (2001). Apolipoprotein E varepsilon4 positive individuals demonstrate delayed olfactory event-related potentials. Neurobiology of Aging, 22, 439-447.