Methodological infrastructure in surgical ergonomics: A review of tasks, models, and measurement systems

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 153-167

  Lee, Gyusung ^a   Lee, Tommy ^a   Dexter, David ^a   Klein, Rosemary ^a   Park, Adrian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Measurement systems; Methodology; Review; Surgical ergonomics

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ERGONOMICS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MOTOR COORDINATION; MUSCLE FATIGUE; OBJECT MANIPULATION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; REVIEW; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

BIOMECHANICS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 34848838655     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350607307956     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Franco G., Fusetti L. Bernadino Ramazzini's early observations of the link between musculoskeletal disorders and ergonomic factors. Appl Ergon. 2004;35:67-70.
2. Scheer SJ, Mital A. Ergonomics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(Suppl 3):S36-S45.
3. Wilson JR Fundamentals of ergonomic in theory and practice. Appl Ergon. 2000;31:557-567.
4. Craik K. Theory of the human operator in control systems. Br J Psychol. 1947;38:56-61.
5. Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn D., Cole G., Stergiou P., Miller J. The effect of material characteristics of shoe soles on muscle activation and energy aspects during running. J Biomech. 2003;36:569-575.
6. Seagull FJ, Ward R., Mills J., Goodrich C., Xiao Y. Measuring awkwardness of workplace layout: Dispersion of attentional and psychomotor resources within the anesthesia workspace. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting. 2004;48:1755-1758.
7. Tittiranonda P., Rempel D., Armstrong T., Burastero S. Effect of four computer keyboards in computer users with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Am J Ind Med. 1999;35:647-661.
8. Andreoni G., Santambrogio GC, Rabuffetti M., Pedotti A. Method for the analysis of posture and interface pressure of car drivers. Appl Ergon. 2002;33:511-522.
9. Reyes Dag, Tang B., Cuschieri A. Minimal access surgery (MAS)-related surgeon morbidity syndromes. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1-13.
10. Goossens Rhm, van Veelen MA Assessment of ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2001;10:175-179.
11. Berguer R. Surgery and ergonomics. Arch Surg. 1999;134:1011-1016.
12. Xin H., Zelek JS, Carnahan H. Laparoscopic surgery, perceptual limitations and force: A review. On-line proceedings of the first Canadian student conference on biomedical computing. Available at: http://cscbc2006.cs.queensu.ca/assets/documents/Papers/paper144.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2007.
13. Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M., Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 1998;175:482-487.
14. Derossis AM, Antoniuk M., Fried GM Evaluation of laparoscopic skills: A 2-year follow-up during residency training. Can J Surg. 1999;42:293-296.
15. Feldman LS, Hagarty SE, Ghitulescu G., Stanbridge D., Fried GM Relationship between objective assessment of technical skills and subjective in-training evaluations in surgical residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:105-110.
16. Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, et al; SAGES FLS Committee. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. 2004;135:21-27.
17. Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R., Stefanidis D., Touchard CL, Scott DJ Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:23-29.
18. Berguer R., Forkey DL, Smith WD The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons' upper extremity workload. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1027-1029.
19. Berguer R., Gerber S., Kilpatrick G., Remler M., Beckley D. A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or palm grasp. Ergonomics. 1999;42:1634-1645.
20. Matern U., Giebmeyer C., Bergmann R., Waller P., Faist M. Ergonomic aspects of four different types of laparoscopic instrument handles with respect to elbow angle. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1528-1532.
21. Matern U., Kuttler G., Giebmeyer C., Waller P., Faist M. Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: An electromyographic-based study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1231-1241.
22. Ahmed S., Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Optimal angle between instrument shaft and handle for laparoscopic bowel suturing. Arch Surg. 2004;139:89-92.
23. Mishra RK, Hanna GB, Brown SI, Cuschieri A. Optimum shadow-casting illumination for endoscopic task performance. Arch Surg. 2004;139:889-892.
24. Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Influence of the optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:371-375.
25. Hanna GB, Drew T., Clinch P., et al. A microprocessor-controlled psychomotor tester for minimal access surgery. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:965-969.
26. Hanna GB, Drew T., Clinch P., Hunter B., Cuschieri A. Computer-controlled endoscopic performance assessment system. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:997-1000.
27. Quick NE, Gillette JC, Shapiro R., Adrales GL, Gerlach D., Park AE The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive surgical training procedures. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:462-465.
28. Uhrich ML, Underwood RA, Standeven JW, Soper NJ, Engsberg JR Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:635-639.
29. van Veelen MA, Kazemier G., Koopman J., Goossens Rhm, Meijer DW Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2002;12:47-52.
30. Matern U., Eichenlaub M., Waller P., Rückauer KD MIS instruments: an experimental comparison of various ergonomic handles and their design. Surg Endosc. 1999; 13: 756-762.
31. Berguer R., Smith WD, Davis S. An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:416-421.
32. Smith WD, Berguer R., Nguyen NT Monitor height affects surgeons' stress level and performance on minimally invasive surgery tasks. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;498-501.
33. Huber JW, Taffinder N., Russell Rcg, Darzi A. The effects of different viewing conditions on performance in simulated minimal access surgery. Ergonomics. 2003;46:999-1016.
34. Crosthwaite G., Chung T., Dunkley P., Shimi S., Cuschieri A. Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 1995;82:849-851.
35. Emam TA, Hanna GB, Kimber C., Cuschieri A. Difference between experts and trainees in the motion pattern of the dominant upper limb during intracorporeal endoscopic knotting. Dig Surg. 2000;17:120-125.
36. Emam TA, Hanna GB, Kimber C., Dunkley P., Cuschieri A. Effect of intracorporeal-extracorporeal instrument length ratio on endoscopic task performance and surgeon movements. Arch Surg. 2000;135:62-65.
37. Patil PV, Hanna GB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A. Effect of fixation of shoulder and elbow joint movement on the precision of laparoscopic instrument manipulations. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:366-368.
38. Emam TA, Frank TG, Hanna GB, Stockham G., Cuschieri A. Rocker handle for endoscopic needle drivers. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:658-661.
39. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A. Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg. 1998;227:481-484.
40. van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Uijttewaal I., Goossens Rhm, Snijder CJ, Kazemier G. Improvement of the laparoscopic needle holder based on new ergonomic guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:699-703.
41. Berguer R., Chen J., Smith WD A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Arch Surg. 2003;138:967-970.
42. Berguer R., Smith WD, Chung YH Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1204-1207.
43. Moorthy K., Munz Y., Undre S., Darzi A. Objective evaluation of the effect of noise on the performance of a complex laparoscopic task. Surgery. 2004;136:25-30.
44. Uchal M., Brogger J., Rukas R., Karlsen B., Bergamaschi R. In-line vs pistol-grip handles in a laparoscopic simulator: A randomized controlled crossover trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1771-1773.
45. Joice P., Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Ergonomic evaluation of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Am J Surg. 1998;176:373-378.
46. Brown SI, Frank TG, Shallaly E., Cuschieri A. Comparison of conventional and gaze-down imaging in laparoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:586-590.
47. Emam TA, Hanna G., Cuschieri A. Comparison of orthodox vs off-optical axis endoscopic manipulations. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:401-405.
48. Emam TA, Hanna G., Cuschieri A. Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:267-271.
49. Emam TA, Frank TG, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Influence of handle design on the surgeon's upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturing. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:667-672.
50. Ahmed S., Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Optimal angle between instrument shaft and handle for laparoscopic bowel suturing. Arch Surg. 2004;139:89-92.
51. Hanna GB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A. Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality. Am J Surg. 1997;174:410-412.
52. Galleano R., Carter F., Brown S., Frank T., Cuschieri A. Can armrests improve comfort and task performance in laparoscopic surgery? Ann Surg. 2006;243:329-333.
53. Goodell KH, Cao Cgl, Schwaitzberg SD Effects of cognitive distraction on performance of laparoscopic surgical tasks. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2000;16:94-98.
54. Smith WD, Berguer R. A simple virtual instrument to monitor surgeons' workload while they perform minimally invasive surgery tasks. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;363-369.
55. Matern U., Koneczny S., Tedeus M., Dietz K., Buess G. Ergonomic testing of two different types of handles via virtual reality simulation. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1147-1150.
56. Person JG, Hodgson AJ, Nagy AG Automated highfrequency posture sampling for ergonomic assessment of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:997-1003.
57. Rasmus M., Riener R., Reiter S., Schneider A., Feussner H. In vivo kinematic measurement during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1649-1656.
58. Dosis A., Aggarwal R., Bello F., et al. Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater. Arch Surg. 2005;140:293-299.
59. van Veelen MA, Jakimowicz JJ, Goossens Rhm, Meijer DW, Bussmann Jbj. Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:674-678.
60. Tang B., Hanna GB, Joice P., Cuschieri A. Identification and categorization of technical errors by observational clinical human reliability assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1215-1220.
61. Geryane MH, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Time-motion analysis of operation theater time use during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by surgical specialist residents. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1597-1600.
62. Joice P., Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery - a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon. 1998;29:409-414.
63. Lee G., Pollo FE Technology overview: The gait analysis laboratory. J Clin Eng. 2001;26:129-135.
64. Giannini S., Catani F, Benedetti MG, Leardini A. Gait Analysis: Methodologies and Clinical Applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press; 1994.
65. Simon Gsc, Andrew JR A three-dimensional examination of the planar nature of the golf swing. J Sports Sci. 2005;23:227-234.
66. Prassas S., Kwon YH, Sands WA Biomechanical research in artistic gymnastics: A review. Sports Biomech. 2006;5:261-291.
67. Kerrigan DC, Lelas JL, Goggins J., Merriman GJ, Kaplan RJ, Felson DT Effectiveness of a lateral-wedge insole on knee varus torque in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;82:889-893.
68. Siegler S., Liu W. Inverse dynamics in human locomotion. In: Allard P, Cappozzo A, Lundberg A, Vaughan CL, eds. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Human Locomotion. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
69. Lee G., Fradet L., Ketcham CJ, Dounskaia N. Efficient control of arm movements in advanced age. Exp Br Res. 2006;177;78-94.
70. Menache A. Understanding Motion Capture for Computer Animation and Video Games. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 1999.
71. Katherine P., Christoph B. Motion capture assisted animation: Texturing and synthesis. Computer Graphics. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, San Antonio, TX, 23-26 July 2002. New York, NY: ACM Press; 2002.
72. Lee G., Kavic SM, George IM, Park AE Postural instability does not necessarily correlate to poor performance: Case in point. Surg Endosc. 2006;21:471-474.
73. Kondraske GV, Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, et al. Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1523-1527.
74. Datta V., Chang A., Mackay S., Darzi A. The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessment. Am J Surg. 2002;184:70-73.
75. Ridgway PF, Ziprin P., Datta VK, et al. Laboratory-based validation of a novel suture technique for wound closure. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49:291-296.
76. Mackay S., Datta V., Mandalia M., Bassett P., Darzi A. Electromagnetic motion analysis in the assessment of surgical skill: Relationship between time and movement. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:632-634.
77. Bann SD, Khan MS, Darzi A. Measurement of surgical dexterity using motion analysis of simple bench tasks. World J Surg. 2003;27:390-394.
78. Khan MS, Bann SD, Darzi A., Butler Pem. Use of suturing as a measure of technical competence. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:304-309.
79. Moorthy K., Munz Y., Dosis A., et al. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:790-795.
80. Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y., et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:372-378.
81. Moorthy K., Munz Y., Undre S., Darzi A. Objective evaluation of the effect of noise on the performance of a complex laparoscopic task. Surgery. 2004;136:25-30.
82. Munz Y., Moothy K., Dosis A., et al. The benefits of stereoscopic vision in robotic-assisted performance on bench models. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:611-616.
83. Dosis A., Bello F., Moorthy K., Munz Y., Gillies D., Darzi A. Real-time synchronization of kinematic and video data for the comprehensive assessment of surgical skills. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004:82-88.
84. Aggarwal R., Dosis A., Bello F., Darzi A. Motion tracking systems for assessment of surgical skill [letter to editor]. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:339.
85. Smith Sgt, Torkington J., Brown TJ, Taffinder NJ, Darzi A. Motion analysis. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:640-645.
86. Patil PV, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Effect of the angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments' plane on monitor image and surgical performance. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:111-114.
87. Gillette JC, Quick NE, Adrales GL, Shapiro R., Park AE Changes in posture mechanics associated with different types of minimally invasive surgical training exercises. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:259-263.
88. Lee G., Weiner M., Kavic SM, George IM, Park AE Joint kinematics vary with performance skills during laparoscopic exercise [fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) task 1]. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(Suppl 2):A911.
89. Lee G., Weiner M., Kavic SM, George IM, Park AE Pilot study-correlation between postural stability and performance time during fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) tasks. Br J Surg. 2006;93(Suppl 1):206.
90. Matern U., Kuttler G., Giebmeyer C., Waller P., Faist M. Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: An electromyographic-based study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18;1231-1241.
91. Lee G., Dexter DJ, Lee TH, Park AE Subtask analysis of joint angles is key to characterizing surgical movement. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(Suppl 1):A894.
92. Koneczny S., Matern U. Instruments for the evaluation of ergonomics in surgery. Min Invas Ther & Allied Technol. 2004;13:167-177.
93. Gopher D., Donchin E. Workload-an examination of the concept. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas J, eds. The Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol 2: Cognitive Processes and Performance. New York, NY: Wiley; 1986.
94. Lofland KR, Mumby PB, Cassisi JE, Palumbo NL, Camic PM Assessment of lumbar EMG during static and dynamic activity in pain-free normals: implications for muscle scanning protocols. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1995;20:3-18.
95. Hagg G., Luttmann A., Jager M. Methodologies for evaluating electromyographic field data in ergonomics. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10:301-312.
96. Newton RU, Murphy AJ, Humphries BJ, Wilson GJ, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K. Influence of load and stretch shortening cycle on the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation that occurs during explosive upper-body movements. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1997;75:333-342.
97. Maithel SK, Villegas L., Stylopoulos N., Dawson S., Jones DB Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:406-411.
98. Berguer R., Forkey DL, Smith WD Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:466-468.
99. Matern U., Faist M., Kehl K., Giebmeyer C., Buess G. Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:436-440.
100. Ankrum DR On the confusion between static load level and static task. Appl Ergon. 2000;31:545-546.
101. Jonsson B. Quantitative electromyographic evaluation of muscular load during work. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1978;6:69-74.
102. Lyons MF, Rouse ME, Baxendale RH Fatigue and EMG changes in the masseter and temporalis muscles during sustained contractions. J Oral Rehabil. 1993;20:321-331.
103. Kupa EJ, Roy SH, Kandarian SC, De Luca CJ Effects of muscle fiber type and size on EMG median frequency and conduction velocity. J Appl Physiol. 1995;79:23-32.
104. Judkins TN, Oleynikov D., Narazaki K., Stergiou N. Robotic surgery and training: Electromyographic correlates of robotic laparoscopic training. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:824-829.
105. Gage WH, Winter DA, Frank JS, Adkin AL Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing. Gait Posture. 2004;19:124-132.
106. Loram ID, Maganaris CN, Lakie M. Paradoxical muscle movement in human standing. J Physiol. 2004;556.3:683-689.
107. Masani K., Popovic MR, Nakazawa K., Kouzaki M., Nozaki D. Importance of body sway velocity information in controlling ankle extensor activities during quiet stance. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:3774-3782.
108. Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F., Ishac M., Gielo-Perczak K. Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:1211-1221.
109. Rietdyk S., Patla AE, Winter DA, Ishac MG, Little CE Balance recovery from medio-lateral perturbations of the upper body during standing. J Biomech. 1999;32:1149-1158.
110. Halliday SE, Winter DA, Frank JS, Patla AE, Prince F. The initiation of gait in young, elderly, and Parkinson's disease subjects. Gait Posture. 1998; 8:8-14.
111. Karst GM, Venema DM, Roehr TG, Tyler AE Center of pressure measures during standing tasks in minimally impaired persons with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005;29:170-180.
112. Kant IJ, de Jong LC, van Rijssen-Moll M., Borm PJ A survey of static and dynamic work postures of operating room staff. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1992;63:423-428.
113. van Veelen MA, Nederlof Eal, Goossens Rhm, Schot CJ, Jakimowicz JJ Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1077-1081.
114. Berguer R., Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H., Alarcon A., Chung J. A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:139-142.
115. Lee G., Park AE Development of a novel tool to more precisely analyze postural stability of laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21(Suppl 1):S317.