Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing

NeuroImage

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1587-1595

  Horovitz, Silvina G ^a,d   Rossion, Bruno ^b   Skudlarski, Pawel ^c   Gore, John C ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

ERP; Face perception; fMRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACE; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODULATION; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARAMETER; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NERVE NET; OXYGEN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 3242688227     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.018     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allison T., Puce A., Spencer D.D., McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception: potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and nonface stimuli. Cereb. Cortex. 9:1999;415-430
2. Barton J.J.S., Press D.Z., Keenan J.P., O'Connor M. Lesions of the fusiform, face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology. 58:2002;71-78
3. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8:1996;551-565
4. Bötzel K., Schulze S., Stodieck S.R.G. Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials. Exp. Brain Res. 104:1995;134-143
5. Dale A.M., Halgren E. Spatiotemporal mapping of brain activity by integration of multiple modalities. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11:2001;202-208
6. Dale A.M., Sereno M. Improved localization of cortical activity combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5:1993;162-176
7. Di Russo F., Martinez A., Sereno M.I., Pitzalis S., Hillyard S.A. Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15(2):2002;95-111
8. Eimer M. The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. NeuroReport. 11:2000;2319-2324
9. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature. 392:1998;598-601
10. Formisano E., Goebel R. Tracking cognitive processes with functional MRI mental chronometry. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13:2003;174-181
11. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Moylan J., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., Anderson A.W. The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:2000;495-504
12. Goffaux V., Gauthier I., Rossion B. Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing. Cogn. Brain Res. 16:2003;416-424
13. Halgren E., Raij T., Marinkovic K., Jousmaki V., Hari R. Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. Cereb. Cortex. 10:2000;69-81
14. Hasselmo M.E., Rolls E.T., Baylis G.C. The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey. Behav. Brain Res. 32:1989;203-218
15. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4:2000;223-233
16. Haxby J.V., Gobbini M.I., Furey M.L., Ishai A., Schouten J.L., Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science. 293:2001;2425-2430
17. Henson R.N., Goshen-Gottstein Y., Ganel T., Otten L.J., Quayle A., Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. Cereb. Cortex. 13(7):2003;793-805
18. Hoffman E., Haxby J.V. Distinct representation of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nat. Neurosci. 3:2000;80-84
19. Horovitz S.G., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C. Correlations and dissociations between BOLD signal and P300 amplitude in an auditory oddball task: a parametric approach to combining fMRI and ERP. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 20(4):2002;319-325
20. Itier R.J., Taylor M.J. Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs. NeuroImage. 15:2002;353-372
21. Jemel B., Schuller A.M., Cheref-Khan Y., Goffaux V., Crommelinck M., Bruyer R. Stepwise emergence of the face-sensitive N170 event-related potential component. NeuroReport. 14(16):2003;2035-2039
22. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.-M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17:1997;4302-4311
23. Liu A.K., Belliveau J.W., Dale A.M. Spatiotemporal imaging of human brain activity using functional MRI constrained magnetoencephalography data: Monte Carlo simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95(15):1998;8945-8950
24. Liu A.K., Dale A.M., Belliveau J.W. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Hum. Brain Mapp. 16:2002;47-62
25. Logothetis N.K. The underpinnings of the BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. J. Neurosci. 23(10):2003;3963-3971. (May 15)
26. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., Augath M., Trinath T., Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 412(6843):2001;150-157
27. McCarthy G., Puce A., Belger A., Allison T. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 9:1999;431-444
28. Menon R.S., Kim S.G. Spatial and temporal limits in cognitive neuroimaging with fMRI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3:1999;207-216
29. Miltner W., Braun C., Johnson R. Jr., Simpson G.V., Ruchkin D.S. A test of brain electrical source analysis (BESA): a simulation study. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 91(4):1994;295-310
30. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Michel C.M., Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 18(1):1994;49-65
31. Perrett D.I., Smith P., Potter D.D., Mistlin A.J., Head A.S., Milner A.D., Jeeves M.A. Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B. 223(1232):1985;293-317
32. Puce A., Allison T., Gore J.C., McCarthy G. Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. J. Neurophysiol. 74:1995;1192-1199
33. Puce A., Allison T., Bentin S., Gore J.C., McCarthy G. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J. Neurosci. 18:1998;2188-2199
34. Puce A., Allison T., McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III. Effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials. Cereb. Cortex. 9:1999;445-458
35. Rees G., Friston K., Koch C. A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5. Nat. Neurosci. 3(7):2000;716-723
36. Rossion B., Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Despland P.A., Bruyer R., Linotte S., Crommelinck M. The N170 occipito-temporal component is enhanced and delayed to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. NeuroReport. 11:2000;69-74
37. Rossion B., Curran T., Gauthier I. A defense of the subordinate-expertise account for the N170 component. Cognition. 85:2002;189-196
38. Rossion B., Joyce C., Cottrell G., Tarr M.J. Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word and object processing in the visual cortex. NeuroImage. 20(3):2003;1609-1624
39. Sagiv N., Bentin S. Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: holistic and part-based processes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13:2001;937-951
40. Scherg M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. Grandori F., Hoke M., Romani G.L. Auditory Evoked Magnetic and Magnetic and Electric Potentials. Adv. Audiol. 1990;40-69 Karger, Basel
41. Schweinberger S.R., Pickering E.C., Jentzsch I., Burton A.M., Kaufmann J.M. Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cogn. Brain Res. 14:2002;398-409
42. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology. 23(6):1986;695-703
43. Sergent J., Otha S., MacDonald B. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. Brain. 115:1992;15-36
44. Skudlarski P., Constable R.T., Gore J.C. ROC analysis of statistical methods used in functional MRI: individual subjects. NeuroImage. 9(3):1999;311-329
45. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. 1988;Georg Thieme Verlag, New York, NY
46. Watanabe S., Kakigi R., Puce A. The spatio-temporal dynamics of the face inversion effect: a magneto- and electro-encephalographic study. Neuroscience. 116:2003;879-895