Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 6: Reactions to restorative materials, tooth-restoration interfaces, and adhesive techniques

Quintessence International

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 35-63

  Mjör, Ivar A ^a,b   Ferrari, Marco ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b Nordisk Institutt for Odontologiske Materialer   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bacteria; Calcium hydroxide; Dentinal permeability; Glass ionomer; Healing potentials; Luting cement; Microleakage; Resin composite; Tertiary dentin; Zinc oxide eugenol

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DRUG EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PERMEABILITY; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; WOUND HEALING;

ADULT; AGED; BACTERIA; BIOLOGY; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN PERMEABILITY; DENTIN, SECONDARY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0036371821     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (164)

1. Mjör IA. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. 2. Initial reactions to preparation of teeth for restorative procedures. Quintessence Int 2001;32:537-551.
2. Stanley HR. Toxicity Testing of Dental Materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1985:91-121.
3. Mjör IA. The basis for everyday, real-life operative dentistry. Oper Dent 2001;26:521-524.
4. Bjørndal L, Mjör IA. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. 4. Dental caries-Characteristics of lesions and pulpal reactions. Quintessence Int 2001;32:717-736.
5. Mjör IA. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. 5. Clinical management and tissue changes associated with wear and trauma. Quintessence Int 2001;32:771-788.
6. Langeland K. Tissue Changes in the Pulp [thesis]. Oslo: University of Oslo, 1957:1-146.
7. Langeland K. Criteria for biologic evaluation of anterior tooth filling materials. Int Dent J 1967;17:405-440.
8. Stanley HR. Design of a human pulp study. I. Oral Surg 1968;25:633-647.
9. Stanley HR. Design of a human pulp study. II. Oral Surg 1968;25:756-764.
10. Qvist V, Stoltze K. Identification of significant variables for pulp reactions to dental materials. J Dent Res 1982;61: 20-24.
11. Qvist V, Stoltze K, Qvist J. Human pulp reactions to resin restorations performed with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Acta Odontol Scand 1989;47:253-263.
12. Murray P, About I, Lumley PJ, Smith G, Franquin JC, Smith AJ. Postoperative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:321-329.
13. Fish EW. An Experimental Investigation of Enamel, Dentin and the Dental Pulp. London: John Bale Sons and Danielson, 1932.
14. Spreter von Kreudenstein T. Ämnesomsättningen i dentinet. Sven Tandlak Tid 1963;56:437-455.
15. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Franquin J-C, Remusat M, Smith AJ. Human odontoblast cell numbers after dental injury. J Dent 2000;28:277-285.
16. Murray PE, About I, Franquin J-C, Remusat M, Smith AJ. Restorative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:482-491.
17. Murray PE, About I, Remusat R, Franquin J-C, Smith AJ. Human cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity. Am J Dent 2001 (in press).
18. Murray PE, Lumley PJ, Smith AJ. Comparison of operative procedure variables on in vitro pulpal viability. Am J Dent 2001 (in press).
19. Pashley DH. Dentin-predentin complex and its permeability: Physiological overview. J Dent Res 1985;64(special issue):613-620.
20. Pashley DH. Dynamics of the pulpo-dentin complex. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7:104-133.
21. Tagami J, Hosoda H, Burrow MF, Nakajima M. Effect of aging and caries on dentin permeability. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(suppl 1):149-154.
22. Mjör IA. Dentin-predentin complex and its permeability: Pathology and treatment overview. J Dent Res 1985;64 (special issue):621-627.
23. Smith AJ, Cassidy N. Perry H, Bègue-Kirn C, Ruch J-V, Lesot H. Reactionary dentinogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 1995;39:273-280.
24. Heyeraas KJ, Sveen OB, Mjör IA. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. 3. Pulpal inflammation and its sequela. Quintessence Int 2001;32:611-625.
25. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN, Mjör IA. Bonding of all-porcelain crowns: Structural characteristics of the substrate. Dent Mater 2001;17:156-164.
26. Brännström M, Åström A. The hydrodynamics of the dentine: Its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972;22:219-227.
27. Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Moorhead JE. Amalgam restorations: Postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth. Oper Dent 1999;24:377-383.
28. Pashley DH. The effects of acid etching on the pulpodentin complex. Oper Dent 1992;17:229-242.
29. About I, Murray PE, Franquin J-C, Remusat M, Smith AJ. The effect of cavity restoration variables on odontoblast cell numbers and dental repair. J Dent 2001;29:109-117.
30. Murray PE, Lumley PJ, Smith AJ, Ross HF. The influence of sample dimensions on hydroxyl ion release from calcium hydroxide products. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16:251-257.
31. Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. Microbiological validation of assessment of caries activity during cavity preparation. Caries Res 1993;27:402-408.
32. Stanley HR, Ranney RR. Age changes in the human dental pulp. Oral Surg 1962;15:1396-1404.
33. Klinge RF. A microradiographic and electron microscopic study of tertiary dentin in human deciduous teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:87-92.
34. Cox CF, Heys DR, Gibbons PK, Avery JK, Heys RJ. The effect of various restorative materials on the microhardness of reparative dentin. J Dent Res 1980;59:109-115.
35. Mjör IA, Sveen OB, Heyeraas KJ. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. 1. Normal structure and physiology. Quintessence Int 2001;32:427-446.
36. Mjör IA, Nordahl I. The density and branching of dentinal tubules in human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:401-412.
37. Skogedal O, Mjör IA. Pulp reactions to silicate cement in teeth with healing pulpitis. Scand J Dent Res 1977;85: 575-582.
38. Mjör IA, Tronstad L. The healing of experimentally induced pulpitis. Oral Surg 1974;38:115-121.
39. Mjör IA, Finn SB, Quigley MB. The effect of calcium hydroxide and amalgam on non-carious vital dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1961;3:283-291.
40. Mjör IA. The effect of zinc oxide and eugenol on dentine evaluated by microhardness testing. Arch Oral Biol 1962; 7:333-336.
41. Mjör IA, Nygaard-Østby B. Experimental investigations on the effect of Ledermix on normal pulps. J Oral Therap Pharmacol 1966;2:367-375.
42. Mjör IA. Histologic studies of human coronal dentine following the insertion of various filling materials in experimentally prepared cavities. Arch Oral Biol 1967;12:441-452.
43. Mjör IA, Furseth R. The inorganic phase of calcium hydroxide- and corticosteroid-covered dentine studied by electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 1968;13:755-763.
44. Furseth R, Mjör IA. The fine structure of corticosteroid-covered, human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1972;17:19-28.
45. Mjör IA, Furseth R. The fine structure of corticosteroid-covered, human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1972;17: 719-728.
46. Massler M, Barber TK. Action of amalgam on dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 1953;47:415-422.
47. Möller B. Reaction of the human dental pulp to silver amalgam restorations. Mercury determination in the pulp by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Swed Dent J 1978;2:93-97.
48. Mjör IA. The effect of calcium hydroxide, zinc oxide/ eugenol and amalgam on the pulp. Odontol Tidskr 1963; 71:94-105.
49. About I, Murray PE, Franquin J-C, Remusat M, Smith AJ. Pulpal inflammatory responses following non-carious class V restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26:336-342.
50. Möller B. Reaction of the human dental pulp to silver amalgam restorations. The modifying effect of treatment with calcium hydroxide. Acta Odontol Scand 1975;33: 233-238.
51. Eriksen HM. Protection against harmful effects of a restorative procedure using an acidic cavity cleanser. J Dent Res 1976;55:281-284.
52. Smith AJ, Sloan AJ, Matthews JB, Murray PE, Lumley PJ. Reparative processes in dentine and pulp. In: Addy M, Embery G, Edgar WM, Orchardson R (eds.) Tooth Wear and Sensitivity London: Martin Dunitz, 2000:53-66.
53. Cox CF, Suzuki S. Re-evaluating pulp protection: Calcium hydroxide liners vs. cohesive hybridization. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:823-831.
54. Brännström M, Isacsson G, Johnson G. The effect of calcium hydroxide and fluorides on human dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 1976;34:59-67.
55. Brännström M, Garberoglio R. The dentinal tubules and the odontoblast processes. Acta Odontol Scand 1972;30: 291-311.
56. Suzuki S, Cox CF White KC. Pulpal responses after complete crown preparation, dentinal sealing, and provisional restoration. Quintessence Int 1994;25:477-485.
57. Mjör IA. Microradiograpy of human coronal dentin. Arch Oral Biol 1966;11:225-234.
58. Ketterl W. Studie über das dentin der permanenten zähne des menschen. Stoma 1961;14:79-96.
59. Garberoglio R, Brännström M. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Arch Oral Biol 1976;21:355-362.
60. Kramer IRH, McLean JW. The response of the human pulp to self-polymerising acrylic restorations. I. Br Dent J 1952;92:255-261.
61. Kramer IRH, McLean JW. The response of the human pulp to self-polymerising acrylic restorations. II. Br Dent J 1952;92:281-287.
62. Kramer IRH, McLean JW. The response of the human pulp to self-polymerising acrylic restorations. III. Brit Dent J 1952;92:311-315.
63. Nygaard-Östby B. Pulp reactions to direct filling resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1955;50:7-13.
64. Langeland LK, Guttuso J, Jerome DR, Langeland K. Histologic and clinical comparison of Addent with silicate cements and cold-curing materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1966;72:373-385.
65. Buonocore MB. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;35:846-851.
66. Buonocore MG, Quigley M. Bonding of a synthetic resin material to human dentin: Preliminary histologic study of the bond area. J Am Dent Assoc 1958;57:807-811.
67. Holz J, Fiore-Donno G, Baume L-J. Contrôles biologiques des matériaux d'obturation: normalisation des méthodes expérimentales et des critères d'évaluation. Rev Mens Suisse Odontostomatol 1968;78:307-351.
68. Brännström M, Nyborg H. Pulpal reaction to composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:181-189.
69. Eriksen HM. Protective effect of different lining materials placed under composite resin restorations in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 1974;82:373-380.
70. Eriksen HM. Protection against harmful effects of a restorative procedure using an acidic cavity cleanser. J Dent Res 1976;55:281-284.
71. Stanley HR, Going RE, Chauncey HH. Human pulp response to acid pretreatment of dentin and to composite restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 1975;91:817-825.
72. Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ. Bacterial penetration, pulpal reaction and the inner surface of Concise Enamel Bond. Composite fillings in etched and unetched cavities. J Dent Res 1978;57:3-10.
73. Leidal TI, Eriksen HM. Human pulp response to composite resin restorations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1: 66-68.
74. Schmalz G. Biologische eigenschaften von komposit-füllungmaterialien. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1985;40:897-901.
75. Fusayama T. New Concepts in Operative Dentistry. Tokyo: Quintessence, 1980:118-119.
76. Fusayama T. Total etch technique and cavity isolation. J Esthet Dent 1992;4:105-109.
77. Inokishi S, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Pulpal response to a new adhesive restorative resin. J Dent Res 1982;61:1014-1019.
78. White KS, Cox CF, Kanca J, Dixon DL, Farmer JB. Pulp response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: Damp versus dry primer application. Quintessence Int 1994;25:259-268.
79. Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ, Cox CF. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater 2001 (in press).
80. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:257-262.
81. Kugel G, Ferrari M. Bonding to enamel and dentin: Characteristics of different generations of bonding systems. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:20S-25S.
82. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of Dental Hard Tissues. Chicago: Quintessence, 1998.
83. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I. Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308.
84. Perdigao J. An Ultra-Morphological Study of Human Dentine Exposed to Adhesive Systems [thesis]. Leuven, Belgium: Catholic University of Leuven, 1995.
85. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Influence of clinical procedures on bonding to root canal walls: An SEM evaluation. Dent Mater 2001 (in press).
86. Dagostin A, Ferrari M. In vivo bonding mechanism of an experimental dual-cure enamel-dentin bonding system. Am J Dent 2001;14:105-108.
87. Gwinnett AJ. Altered tissue contribution to interfacial bond strength with acid conditioned dentin. Am J Dent 1994;7:243-246.
88. Wakabayashi Y, Kondou Y, Suzuki K. Effect of dissolution of collagen on adhesion to dentin. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7:302-306.
89. Ferrari M, Mason PN, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Role of hybridization of marginal leakage and bond strength. Am J Dent 2000;13:329-336.
90. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SHY. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995;74:1168-1178.
91. Kanca J. Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996;6:273-276.
92. Ferrari, M, Mannocci F, Kugel G, Garcia-Godoy F. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime & Bond NT. Am J Dent 1999;12:77-83.
93. Duke ES, Lindemuth J. Polymeric adhesion to dentin: Contrasting substrates. Am J Dent 1990;3:264-270.
94. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Mapping of tubules and intertubule surface area available for bonding in class V and class II preparations. J Dent 1997;25:379-389.
95. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco M, Davidson CL. Resistance of cementum in Class II and V cavities to penetration by an adhesive system. Dent Mater 1997;13:157-162.
96. Ferrari M, Grandini S. State of the art of adhesion to dental substrates. Real Clin 2000;11:419-429.
97. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho R, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhesive Dent 2000;2:83-98.
98. Cox CF, Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox LK. Histological evaluation of direct pulp capping with various adhesive systems. In: Shimono M, Maeda T, Suda H, Takahashi K (eds). Dentin/Pulp Complex. Tokyo: Quintessence, 1996:209-216.
99. Ferrari M. Use of glass ionomers as bondings, linings, or base. In: Davidson CL, Mjör IA (eds). Advances in Glass-Ionomer Cements. Chicago: Quintessence, 1999:137-148.
100. Fonzi L. Anatomia Funzionale e Clinica cello Splancnocranio. Milan: Edi-ermes, 2000:218-222.
101. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972;132: 133-135.
102. Saito S, Tosaki S, Hirota K. Characteristics of glass-ionomer cements. In: Davidson CL, Mjör IA: Advances in Glass-Ionomer Cements. Chicago: Quintessence, 1999: 15-50.
103. Mjör IA, Nordahl I, Tronstad L. Glass ionomer cements and dental pulp. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;7:59-64.
104. Nicholson JW. Chemistry of glass-ionomer cements: A review. Biomaterials 1998;19:485-494.
105. Watson TF. Bonding glass-ionomer cements to tooth structure. In: Davidson CL, Mjör IA (eds). Advances in Glass-Ionomer Cements. Chicago: Quintessence, 1999:121-136.
106. Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, Wei SHY, Pashley DH. Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin. J Adhesive Dent 2001;3:153-167.
107. Wesenberg G, Hals E. The in vitro effect of a glass ionomer cement on dentine and enamel walls. An electron probe and microradiographic study. J Oral Rehabil 1980;7:35-42.
108. Geiger SB, Weiner S. Fluoridated carbonatoapatite in the intermediate layer between glass ionomer and dentin. Dent Mater 1993;9:33-36.
109. Ngo H, Mount GJ, Peters MC. A study of glass-ionomer cement and its interface with enamel and dentin using a low-temperature, high-resolution scanning electron microscopic technique. Quintessence Int 1997;28:63-69.
110. Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Interdiffusion of a traditional glass ionomer cement into conditioned dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:295-297.
111. Sennou HE, Lebugle AA, Gregoire GL. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the dentin-glass ionomer cement interface. Dent Mater 1999;15:229-237.
112. Hensten-Pettersen A. General toxicology. In: Lang BR, Morris HF, Razzoog ME (eds). International Workshop. Biocompatibility, Toxicity and Hypersensitivity to Alloy Systems Used in Dentistry. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan School of Dentistry, 1986:140-172.
113. Holmstrup P. Oral mucosa and skin reactions related to amalgam. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:120-124.
114. Mjör IA. Problems and benefits associated with restorative materials. Side effects and cost-benefit analysis. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:7-16.
115. Kim S, Döscher-Kim J, Liu M, Grayson A. Functional alteration in pulpal microcirculation in response to various dental procedures and materials. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(suppl 1):65-71.
116. Langeland K, Langeland LK. Pulp reactions to crown preparation, impression, temporary crown fixation, and permanent cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1966;15:129-143.
117. Raab WH-M. Temperature related changes in pulp microcirculation. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(suppl 1):469-479.
118. Brännström M, Nyborg H. Pulp reaction to a temporary zinc oxide/eugenol cement. J Prosthet Dent 1976;35:185-191.
119. Zander HA, Pejko I. Protection of the pulp under silicate cements with cavity varnishes and cement linings. J Am Dent Assoc 1947;34:811-819.
120. Zander HA, Glenn JF, Nelson CA. Pulp protection in restorative dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1950;41:563-573.
121. Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ, Torstenson B, Hedström KG, Wahlstam H. Protective effect of polystyrene liners for composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49: 331-336.
122. Øilo G. Luting cements: A review and comparison. Int Dent J 1991;41:81-88.
123. Christensen GJ, Christensen R. User survey-1990. Clin Res Assoc Newsletter 1990;14(12):1-3.
124. Berry TG, Kaiser DA, Schwartz RS. Cast-gold restorations. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS (eds.) Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. A Contemporary Approach. Chicago: Quintessence, 2001:500-525.
125. White SN, Yu Z. Compressive and diametral tensile strengths of current adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:568-572.
126. Johnson GH, Powell LV, Derouen TA. Evaluation and control of post cementation pulpal sensitivity: Zinc phosphate and glass ionomer luting cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:39-46.
127. Jokstad A, Mjör IA. Ten years' clinical evaluation of three luting cements. J Dent 1996;24:309-315.
128. Heys RJ, Fitzgerald M, Heys DR, Charbeneau GT. An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: pulpal histologic response. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:607-611.
129. Grieve AR. The effect of silicate cement on enamel and dentin. Scand J Dent Res 1974;82:510-516.
130. Mejàre B, Mejàre I, Edwardsson S. Bacterial beneath composite restorations - A culturing and histobacteriological study. Acta Odontol Scand 1979;27:267-275.
131. Mjör IA. Bacteria in experimentally infected cavity preparations. Scand J Dent Res 1977;85:599-605.
132. Brännström M, Nyborg H. Cavity treatment with a microbicidal fluoride solution: Growth of bacteria and effect on the pulp. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:303-310.
133. Qvist V. Pulp reactions in human teeth to tooth colored filling materials. Scand J Dent Res 1975;83:54-66.
134. Eriksen HM, Buonocore MG. Marginal leakage with different composite materials: Effect of restorative techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93:1143-1148.
135. Brännström M, Vojinovic D. Response of the dental pulp to around three filling materials. J Dent Child 1976;43:15-21.
136. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesch WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-450.
137. Cox CF. Microleakage related to restorative procedures. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(suppl 1):83-93.
138. Langeland K. Tissue Changes in the Pulp [thesis]. Oslo: University of Oslo, 1957.
139. Mjör IA, Tronstad L. Experimentally induced pulpitis. Oral Surg 1972;34:102-108.
140. Bergenholtz G, Lindhe J. Effect of soluble plaque factors on inflammatory reactions in the dental pulp. Scand J Dent Res 1975;83:153-158.
141. Bergenholtz G. Effect of bacterial products on inflammatory reactions in the dental pulp. Scand J Dent Res 1977; 85:122-129.
142. Beagrie GS, Brännström M. Pulpal response to cavity treatment with microbicidal solution and silicate restorations in monkeys. J Can Dent Assoc 1977;43:239-243.
143. Shovelton DS. The presence and distribution of micro-organisms within non-vital teeth. Br Dent J 1964; 117:101-107.
144. Valderhaug J. A histologic study of experimentally induced periapical inflammation in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg 1974;3:111-123.
145. Reeves R, Stanley HR. The relationship of bacterial penetration and pulpal pathosis in carious teeth. Oral Surg 1966;22:59-65.
146. Nygaard-Østby B. Caries profunda. Nor Tannl Foren Tid 1951;61:96-105.
147. Skjorland KK. Plaque accumulation on different dental filling materials. Scand J Dent Res 1973;81:538-542.
148. Svanberg M, Mjör IA, Ørstavik D. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite and glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1990;68:861-864.
149. Brännström M, Nyborg H. The presence of bacteria in cavities filled with silicate cement and composite resin materials. Swed Dent J 1971;64:149-155.
150. Brännström M, Vojinovic O. Response of the dental pulp to invasion of bacteria around three filling materials. J Dent Child 1976;43:15-21.
151. Brännström M, Vojinovic O, Nordenvall KJ. Bacteria and pulpal reactions under silicate cement restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:290-295.
152. Cox CF, Subay RK, Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Ostro E. Biocompatibility of various dental materials: Pulp healing with a surface seal. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:241-251.
153. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: A summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 1972;84:1349-1357.
154. Kidd EAM. Microleakage in relation to amalgam and composite restorations. Br Dent J 1976;141:305-310.
155. Brännström M. Dentine and Pulp in Restorative Dentistry. London: Wolfe Medical, 1982.
156. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: A literature review with case report. Quintessence Int 2000;31:165-179.
157. Bjørndal L, Thylstrup A. A practice-based study on step-wise excavation of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth. A 1-year follow-up study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:122-128.
158. Jørgensen KD, Wakumoto S. Occlusal amalgam fillings: Marginal defects and secondary caries. Odontol Tidskr 1968;73:43-54.
159. Saltzberg DS, Ceravolo FJ, Holstein F, Groom G, and Gottsengen R. Scanning electron microscope study of the junction between restorations and gingival cavosurface margins. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:517-522.
160. Soderholm K-J, Antonson DE, Fishlschweiger W. Correlation between marginal discrepancies at the amalgam/tooth interface and recurrent caries. In: Anusavice KJ (ed). Quality Evaluation of Dental Restorations: Criteria for Placement and Replacement. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989:85-108.
161. Christersson CE. On interfacial film formation and bacterial retention to solids. A methodological and in vitro study [thesis]. Swed Dent J 1991;14(suppl 77):1-82.
162. Stanley HR, Swerdlow H. Minimizing pulpal reactions with prednisolone therapy. J Oral Therap Pharmacol 1966; 3:1-8.
163. Mjör IA, Lervik T. Pulp healing subjacent to corticosteroid-covered and amalgam-covered dentin. Oral Surg 1975;40:789-795.
164. Lervik T, Mjör IA. Evaluation of techniques for the induction of pulpitis. J Biol Buccale 1977;5:137-148.