Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-7

  Knapen, Tomas ^a   Paffen, Chris ^a   Kanai, Ryota ^b   van Ee, Raymond ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Bistable perception; Flicker and switch rivalry; Interocular grouping; Shape perception; Stimulus rivalry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FLICKER FUSION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 33751197486     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alais D., O'Shea R.P., Mesana-Alais C., and Wilson I.G. On binocular alternation. Perception 29 12 (2000) 1437-1445
2. Blake R., and Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nature Review on Neuroscience 3 1 (2002) 13-21
3. Blake R., Westendorf D.H., and Overton R. What is suppressed during binocular rivalry?. Perception 9 2 (1980) 223-231
4. Bonneh Y., Sagi D., and Karni A. A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Research 41 8 (2001) 981-989
5. Carlson T.A., and He S. Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry. Neuron 43 6 (2004) 907-914
6. Diaz-Caneja E. Sur l'Alternation binoculaire [On binocular alternation]. Annalses d'Oculistique 165 (1928) 721-731
7. Fang F., and He S. Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience 8 10 (2005) 1380-1385
8. Fox R., and Check R. Detection of motion during binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 3 (1968) 388-395
9. Fox R., and Check R. Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 2 (1972) 283-289
10. Gilbert C.D. Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 268 2 (1977) 391-421
11. Hubel D.H., and Wiesel T.N. Receptive fileds, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 160 (1962) 105-154
12. Kanai R., Moradi F., Shimojo S., and Verstraten F.A. Perceptual alternation induced by visual transients. Perception 34 7 (1962) 803-822
13. Kovacs I., Papathomas T.V., Yang M., and Feher A. When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 26 (1996) 15508-15511
14. Kuhnt U., and Creutzfeldt O.D. Decreased post-synaptic inhibition in the visual cortex during flicker stimulation. Electroencephaphy and Clinical Neurophysiology 30 (1971) 79-82
15. Lee S.H., and Blake R. Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research 39 8 (1999) 1447-1454
16. Lee S.H., and Blake R. A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 44 10 (2004) 983-991
17. Leopold D.A., and Logothetis N.K. Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379 6565 (1996) 549-553
18. Leopold D.A., and Logothetis N.K. Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends in Cognition Science 3 7 (1999) 254-264
19. Logothetis N.K., Leopold D.A., and Sheinberg D.L. What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?. Nature 380 6575 (1996) 621-624
20. Ngo T.T., Miller S.M., Liu G.B., and Pettigrew J.D. Binocular rivalry and perceptual coherence. Current Biology 10 4 (2000) R134-R136
21. Nguyen V., Freeman A., and Alais D. Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research 43 19 (2003) 2003-2008
22. O'Shea R.P., and Corballis P.M. Visual grouping on binocular rivalry in a split-brain observer. Vision Research 45 2 (2005) 247-261
23. Pearson J., and Clifford C.W.G. Suppressed patterns alter vision during binocular rivalry. Current Biology 15 23 (2005) 2142-2148
24. Pearson J., and Clifford C.W.G. When your brain decides what you see. Psychological Science 16 7 (2005) 516-519
25. Ringach D.L. Mapping receptive fields in primary visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 558 3 (2004) 717-728
26. Skottun B.C., and Freeman R.D. Stimulus specificity of binocular cells in the cat's visual cortex: ocular dominance and the matching of left and right eyes. Experimental Brain Research 56 (1984) 206-216
27. Tong F., and Engel S.A. Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411 6834 (2001) 195-199
28. van de Grind, W. A., Gruesser, O. J. & Lunkenheimer (1973). Temporal transfer properties of the afferent visual system. In R. Jung (Ed.), Handbook of sensory physiology, Central processing of visual information (pp. 431-573), Vol. VII/3A, Part A. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
29. Wales R.F., and Fox R. Increment detection threshold during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception and Psychophysics 8 (1970) 90-94
30. Wilson H.R. Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 24 (2003) 14499-14503
31. Wilson H.R., Blake R., and Lee S.H. Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature 412 (2001) 907-910