Binocular rivalry and mortion perception

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 46-60

  Blake, Randolph ^a   Yu, Karen ^a   Lokey, Michelle ^a   Norman, Hideko ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KOBE WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; MONOCULAR VISION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ANIMALS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0031594791     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892998563770     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Allman, J. M., Miezin, R., & McGuinness, E. (1985). Direction- and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (AIT). Perception, 14, 105-126.
2. Anstis, S. M., & Duncan, K. (1983). Separate motion after-effect from each eye and from both eyes. Vision Research, 23, 161-169.
3. Anstis, S. M., & Moulden, B. P. (1970). Aftereffect of seen movement: Evidence for peripheral and central components. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 222-229.
4. Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The oblique effect in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266-278.
5. Barlow, H. B., & Brindley, G. S. (1963). Inter-ocular transfer of movement after-effects during pressure blinding of the stimulated eye. Nature, 200, 1346-1347.