Assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries: MR angiography with parallel acquisition versus conventional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography

Radiology

Volumn 245, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 276-284

  Sutter, Reto ^a   Nanz, Daniel ^a   Lutz, Amelie M ^a,b   Pfammatter, Thomas ^a   Seifert, Burkhardt ^c   Struwe, Anja ^a   Heilmaier, Christina ^a   Weishaupt, Dominik ^a   Marincek, Borut ^a   Willmann, Jürgen K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOBUTROL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; ILIAC ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KAPPA STATISTICS; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RENAL ARTERY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RENAL ARTERY; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34548664398     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2451062081     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Glockner JF. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MH angiography: applications for abdominal imaging. Radiographics 2001;21:357-370.
2. Korst MB, Joosten FB, Postma CT, Jager GJ, Krabbe JK, Barentsz JO. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MB angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries. AJR Am J Boentgenol 2000;174:629-634.
3. Nael K, Laub G, Finn JP. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoraco-abdominal vessels. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005;13:359-380.
4. Vosshenrich B, Fischer U. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of abdominal vessels: is there still a role for angiography? Eur Radiol 2002;12:218-230.
5. Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, et al. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2003;226:798-811.
6. Golay X, Brown SJ, Itoh B, Melhem ER. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1615-1619.
7. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH, et al. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology 2005;235:087-098.
8. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis, Ann Intern Med 2001;135:401-411.
9. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:674-082.
10. Heiss SG, Shifrin RY, Sommer FG. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-echo renal MR imaging: evaluation of vascular and nonvascular disease. RadioGraphics 2000;20:1341-1352.
11. Chen Q, Quijano CV, Mai VM, et al. On improving temporal and spatial resolution of 3D contrast-enhanced body MR angiography with parallel imaging. Radiology 2004;231:893-899.
12. Kanal E, Borgstede JP, Barkovich AJ, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on MR safety. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1335-1347.
13. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast, imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:591-603.
14. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-1210.
15. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Roesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
16. Born M, Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falk-enhausen M, Schild H, Kuhl CK. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the abdominal arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:559-565.
17. Michaely HJ, Herrmann KA, Kramer H, et al. High-resolution renal MRA: comparison of image quality and vessel depiction with different parallel imaging acceleration factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:95-100.
18. Kroeneke TJ, Wasser MN, Pattynama PM, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1573-1582.
19. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Knopp MV, et al. Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing-in dependent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold. Radiology 1999;211:667-679.
20. Goyen M, Herborn CU, Kroger K, Lauenstein TC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Detection of atherosclerosis; systemic imaging for systemic disease with whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography - initial experience. Radiology 2003;227:277-282.
21. Goldfarb JW. The SENSE ghost: field-of-view restrictions for SENSE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:1046-1051.
22. Zenge MO, Vogt FM, Brauck K, et al. High-resolution continuously acquired peripheral MR angiography featuring partial parallel imaging GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med 2006;36:859-865.
23. Barber GG, Fong H, MePhail NV, Scobie TK. Hemodynamic assessment of the aortoiliac segment: a prospective study. Can J Surg 1980;23:542-544.
24. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology 1996;198:725-732.
25. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Szumowski J, Shimakawa A. Evaluation of the iliac arteries: comparison of two-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:197-203.
26. Poon E, Yucel F.K. Pagan-Marin H, Kayne H. Iliac artery stenosis measurements: comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1139-1144.
27. Schaefer PJ, Boudghene FP, Brambs HJ, et al. Abdominal and iliac arterial stenoses: comparative double-blinded randomized study of diagnostic accuracy of 3D MR angiography with gadodiamide or gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 2006;238:827-840.
28. Rasnack D, Israel GM. Kidney transplantation: evaluation of donors and recipients. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004;12:505-514; vi-vii.
29. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977;33:363-374.
30. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhnis RJ, et al. Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:685-696.
31. Draney MT, Zarins CK, Taylor CA. Three-dimensional analysis of renal artery bending motion during respiration. J Endovasc Ther 2005;12:380-386.