Abdominal and iliac arterial stenoses: Comparative double-blinded randomized study of diagnostic accuracy of 3D MR angiography with gadodiamide or gadopentetate dimeglumine

Radiology

Volumn 238, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 827-840

  Schaefer, Philipp J ^a   Boudghene, Frank P ^a   Brambs, Hans J ^b   Bret Zurita, Montserrat ^b   Caniego, Jose L ^b   Coulden, Richard A ^b   Gehl, Hans B ^b   Hammerstingl, Renate ^b   Huber, Armin ^b   Mendez, Ramiro J ^b   Nonent, Michel ^b   Oestmann, Joerg W ^b   Pueyo, Jesus C ^b   Thurnher, Siegfried ^b   Weishaupt, Dominik ^b   Jahnke, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE; GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ABDOMINAL ARTERY STENOSIS; ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIARRHEA; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG SAFETY; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RASH; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIDE EFFECT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33344464920     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2383041769     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 2000;217:105-114.
2. Glickerman DJ, Obregon RG, Schmiedl UP, et al. Cardiac-gated MR angiography of the entire lower extremity: a prospective comparison with conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:445-451.
3. Poon E, Yucel EK, Pagan-Marin H, Kayne H. Iliac artery stenosis measurements: comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1139-1144.
4. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Szumowski J, Shimakawa A. Evaluation of the iliac arteries: comparison of two-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:197-203.
5. Snidow JJ, Harris VJ, Trerotola SO, et al. Interpretations and treatment decisions based on MR angiography versus conventional arteriography in symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995;6:595-603.
6. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology 1996;198:723-732.
7. Steffens JC, Link J, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Freund M, Brinkmann G, Heller M. Cardiac-gated two-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography of lower extremity occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:749-754.
8. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999;211:59-67.
9. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:656-669.
10. Prince MR. Peripheral vascular MR angiography: the time has come. Radiology 1998;206:592-593.
11. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:683-692.
12. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, Schneider E, Ladd M, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1127-1135.
13. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 1999;210:683-688.
14. Alley MT, Shifrin RY, Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ. Ultrafast contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography: state of the art. RadioGraphics 1998;18:273-285.
15. Aslanian V, Lemaignen H, Bunouf P, Svaland MG, Borseth A, Lundby B. Evaluation of the clinical safety of gadodiamide injection, a new nonionic MRI contrast medium for the central nervous system: a European perspective. Neuroradiology 1996;38:537-541.
16. Harpur ES, Worah D, Hals PA, Holtz E, Furuhama K, Nomura H. Preclinical safety assessment and pharmacokinetics of gadodiamide injection, a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Invest Radiol 1993;28(suppl 1):S28-S43.
17. Thurnher SA, Capelastegui A, Del Olmo FH, et al. Safety and effectiveness of single- versus triple-dose gadodiamide injection-enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen: a phase III double-blind multicenter study. Radiology 2001;219:137-146.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977;33:363-374.
19. Shetty AN, Shirkhoda A, Bis KG, Alcantara A. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in a single breath-hold: a novel technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1290-1292.
20. Vosshenrich R, Castillo E, Kopka L, Rodenwaldt J, Grabbe E. Contrast media-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the peripheral vessels using a "tracking technique": preliminary results. Rofo 1998;168:90-94.
21. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries: combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 2001;36:170-177.
22. Schoenberg SO, Londy FJ, Licato P, Williams DM, Wakefield T, Chenevert TL. Multiphase-multistep gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and run-off vessels. Invest Radiol 2001;36:283-291.
23. Kopka L, Vosshenrich R, Rodenwaldt J, Grabbe E. Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:345-348.
24. Lentschig MG, Reimer P, Rausch-Lentschig UL, Allkemper T, Oelerich M, Laub G. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the major vessels at 1.0 T: dose-response findings and angiographic correlation. Radiology 1998;208:353-357.
25. Laissy JP, Trillaud H, Douek P. MR angiography: noninvasive vascular imaging of the abdomen. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:488-506.
26. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997;204:357-362.
27. Hany TF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries. Original investigation. Invest Radiol 1998;33:653-659.
28. Venkataraman S, Semelka RC, Weeks S, Braga L, Vaidean G. Assessment of aorto-iliac disease with magnetic resonance angiography using arterial phase 3-D gradient-echo and interstitial phase 2-D fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:43-53.
29. Prince MR. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography: theory and optimization. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998;6:257-267.
30. Vosshenrich R, Fischer U. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of abdominal vessels: is there a role for angiography? Eur Radiol 2002;12:218-230.
31. Rofsky NM, Adelman MA. MR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 2000;214:325-338.
32. Schoenberg SO, Essig M, Hallscheidt P, et al. Multiphase magnetic resonance angiography of the abdominal and pelvic arteries: results of a bicenter multireader analysis. Invest Radiol 2002;37:20-28.