Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-echo renal MR imaging: Evaluation of vascular and nonvascular disease

Radiographics

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 1341-1352

  Heiss, Steven G ^a   Shifrin, Roger Y ^a   Sommer, F Graham ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Kidney neoplasms, diagnosis, 81.30; Kidney, infection, 81.20; Kidney, injuries, 81.41; Kidney, MR, 81.12143; Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies, 961.12942; Renal arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 961.122, 961.12942, 961.721

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CIRCULATION; KIDNEY DISEASE; KIDNEY VEIN; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RENAL ARTERY; REVIEW; VASCULARIZATION;

DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KIDNEY; KIDNEY DISEASES; RENAL ARTERY; RENAL CIRCULATION; RENAL VEINS;

EID: 0034263407     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se251341     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Rofsky NM, Weinreb JC, Bosniak MA, Libes RB, Birnbaum BA. Renal lesion characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: efficacy and safety in patients with renal insufficiency. Radiology 1991; 180:85-89.
2. Prince MR. Renal MR angiography: a comprehensive approach. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 511-516.
3. Alley MT, Shifrin RY, Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ. Ultrafast contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography: state of the art. RadioGraphics 1998; 18:273-285.
4. Hany TF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: original investigation. Invest Radiol 1998; 33:653-659.
5. Kettritz U, Semelka RC, Brown ED, Sharp TJ, Lawing WL, Colindres RE. MR findings in diffuse renal parenchymal disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:136-144.
6. Balci NC, Semelka RC, Patt RH, et al. Complex renal cysts: findings on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:1495-1500.
7. Kettritz U, Semelka RC, Siegelman ES, Shoenut JP, Mitchell DG. Multilocular cystic nephroma: MR imaging appearance with current techniques, including gadolinium enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:145-148.
8. Rominger MB, Kenney PJ, Morgan DE, Bernreuter WK, Listinsky JJ. Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of renal masses. RadioGraphics 1992; 12:1097-1118.
9. Semelka RC, Hricak H, Stevens SK, Finegold R, Tomei E, Carroll PR. Combined gadolinium-enhanced and fat-saturation MR imaging of renal masses. Radiology 1991; 178:803-809.
10. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Kroeker MA, Mac Mahon RG, Greenberg HM. Renal lesions: controlled comparison between CT and 1.5-T MR imaging with nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo and breath-hold FLASH techniques. Radiology 1992; 182:425-430.
11. Yamashita Y, Miyazaki T, Hatanaka Y, Takahashi M. Dynamic MRI of small renal cell carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19:759-765.
12. Low RN, Martinez AG, Steinberg SM, et al. Potential renal transplant donors: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and MR urography. Radiology 1998; 207:165-172.
13. Szolar DH, Preidler K, Ebner F, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human renal allografts during the post-transplant period: preliminary observations. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15: 727-735.
14. Nakashima R, Yamashita Y, Tomiguchi S, Tsuji A, Takahashi M. Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys by Gd-DTPA enhanced turbo FLASH MR imaging. Radiat Med 1996; 14:251-256.
15. Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 207:497-504.
16. De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 205:689-695.
17. Gilfeather M, Yoon HC, Siegelman ES, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 210:367-372.
18. Prince MR, Schoenberg SO, Ward JS, Londy FJ, Wakefield TW, Stanley JC. Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 1997; 205:128-136.
19. Kim SH, Park JH, Han JK, Han MC, Kim S, Lee JS. Infarction of the kidney: role of contrast enhanced MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 924-928.
20. Johnson DB, Lerner CA, Prince MR, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15:13-20.
21. Pennington DJ, Lonergan GJ, Flack CE, Waguespack RL, Jackson CB. Experimental pyelonephritis in piglets: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1996; 201:199-205.
22. Fichtner J, Spielman D, Herfkens R, Boineau FG, Lewy JE, Shortliffe LM. Ultrafast contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of congenital hydronephrosis in a rat model. J Urol 1994; 152: 682-687.
23. Rofsky NM, Bosniak MA. MR imaging in the evaluation of small (≤3.0 cm) renal masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1997; 5:67-81.
24. Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Burdeny DA, Mitchell DG, Brown JJ, Siegelman ES. Renal lymphoma: demonstration by MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:823-827.
25. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Magro CM, Kroeker MA, MacMahon R, Greenberg HM. Renal cancer staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo and gradient-echo MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:597-602.