Assessing work task preferences among persons with intellectual disabilities: An integrative review of literature

Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 286-300

  Cobigo, Virginie ^a,c   Morin, Diane ^a   Lachapelle, Yves ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

^c NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548510876     PISSN: 15470350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baker, D. J., Freeman, R., & High, R. (2000). Resident directed communication patterns in community homes for persons with disabilities. Mental Retardation, 38, 489-497.
2. Banat, D., Summers, S., & Pring, T. (2002). An investigation into carers' perceptions of the verbal comprehension ability of adults with severe learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 78-81.
3. Bradshaw, J. (2001). Complexity of staff communication and reported level of understanding skills in adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 233-243.
4. Cameron, L., & Murphy, J. (2002). Enabling young people with learning disability to make choices at a time of transition. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 105-112.
5. Campbell, B., & Fletcher, D. (1993). Analysis of non-verbal behaviors as expressions of personal preference in adults with mental retardation who live in adult residential facilities. Adults Residential Care Journal, 7, 68-74.
6. Cannella, H. I., O'Reilly, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2005). Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 1-15.
7. Conyers, C., Doole, A., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2002). Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 49-58.
8. De Vries, C., Yu, C. T., Sakko, G., Wirth, K. M., Walters, K L., Carole, M. et al. (2005). Predicting the relative efficacy of verbal, pictorial, and tangible stimuli for assessing preferences of leisure activities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 145-154.
9. Fortin, D., & Carrier, S. (1994). La valeur des informations recueillies par entrevues structurées et questionnaires auprès des personnes ayant une déficience intellectuelle [Value of information collected by structured interview or questionnaire with persons with intellectual disabilities]. Revue francophone de la déficience intellectuelle, 5(1), 29-41.
10. Foxx, R. M., Faw, G. D., Taylor, S., Davis, P. K., & Fulia, R. (1993). Would I be able to. . .? Teaching clients to assess the availability of their community lifestyle preferences. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 235-248.
11. Green, C. W., Gardner, S. M., & Reid, D. H. (1997). Increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities: a program replication and component analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 217-228.
12. Green, C. W., & Reid, D. H. (1996). Defining, validating, and increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 67-78.
13. Guillemette, F., & Boisvert, D. (2003). L'entrevue de recherche qualitative avec des adultes présentant une déficience intellectuelle [Qualitative research interview with adults with intellectual disabilities]. Recherches qualitatives, 23, 15-26.
14. Hagopian, L. P., Long, E. S., & Rush, K. S. (2004). Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification, 28, 668-677.
15. Hughes, C., Pitkin, S. E., & Lorden, S. W. (1998). Assessing preferences and choices of persons with severe and profound mental retardation. Education and training in mental retardation and developmental disabilities, 33, 299-316.
16. Jackson, G. B. (1989). La méthodologie des recensions intégratives d'écrits [Integrative review of literature method]. Comportement humain, 3, 1128.
17. Kearney, C. A., & McKnight, T. J. (1997). Preference, choice and persons with disabilities: a synopsis of assessments, interventions and future directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 217-238.
18. Lachapelle, Y., Wehmeyer, M. L., Haelewyck, M. C., Courbois, Y., Keith, K. D., &halock, R. L., et al. (2005). The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: an international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 740-744.
19. Lancioni, G. E., Oliva, D., Andreoni, S., & Pirani, P. (1995). Working with a peer versus working alone: A preliminary assessment of preferences with four persons with multiple handicaps. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilties, 7, 6781.
20. Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Campodonico, F., & Mantini, M. (1998a). Mobility versus sedentariness in task arrangements for people with multiple disabilities: An assessment of preferences. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 465-475.
21. Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M., Campodonico, F., & Mantini, M. (1998a). Task variation versus task repetition for people with profound developmental disabilities: An assessment of preferences. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 189-199.
22. Lohrmann-O'Rourke, S., & Browder, D. M. (1998). Empirically based methods to assess the preferences of individuals with severe disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 146-161.
23. th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
24. Martin, T. L., Martin, G. L., Spevack, S., Verbeke, A., & Yu, D. C. T. (2002). Does choice, independent of preference, improve behavior for persons with developmental disabilities? A review. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 30, 1-15.
25. Mason, S. A., McGee, G. G., Farmer-Dougan, V., & Risely, T. R. (1989). A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 171-179.
26. McConkey, R., Morris, I., & Purcell, M. (1999). Communications between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 194-205.
27. Mithaug, D., & Hanawalt, D. (1978). The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 153-162.
28. Mithaug, D., & Mar, D. (1980). The relation between choosing and working prevocational tasks in two severely retarded young adults, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 177-182.
29. Parsons, M. B., Reid, D. H., & Green, C. W. (1998). Identifying work preferences prior to supported work for an individual with multiple severe disabilities including deaf-blindness. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 329-333.
30. Parsons, R., Reid, D., Reynolds, J., & Bumgarner, M. (1990). Effects of chosen versus assigned jobs on the work performance of persons with severe handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 253-258.
31. Reid, D. H., Everson, J. M., & Green, C. W. (1999). A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 467-477.
32. Reid, D. H., Parsons, M. B., & Green, C. W. (1998). Identifying work preferences among individuals with severe multiple disabilities prior to beginning supported employment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 281-285.
33. Rudrud, E. H., Ferrara, J. A., Wendelgass, P., & Markve, B. (1986). Effect of vocational experience on vocational preference and vocational knowledge. Vocational Education and Work Adjustment Bulletin, 19, 139-142.
34. Spevack, S., Martin, T. L., Hiebert, R., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2004). Effects of choice of work tasks on on-task, aberrant, happiness and unhappiness behaviors of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 11, 79-98.
35. Stancliffe, R. J. (1995). Assessing opportunities for choice-making: A comparison of self- and staff reports. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 418-429.
36. Stock, S. E., Davies, D. K., Secor, R. R., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2003). Self-directed career preference selection for individuals with intellectual disabilities: using computer technology to enhance selfdetermination. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 19, 95-103.
37. Wehmeyer, M. L., & &hwartz, M. (1998) The relationship between self-determination, quality of life, and life satisfaction for adults witih mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 3-12.
38. Worsdell, A., S., Iwata, B., & Wallace, M. D. (2002). Duration-based measures of preference for vocational tasks, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 287-290.