Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities

Behavior Modification

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 668-677

  Hagopian, Louis P ^a,b   Long, Ethan S ^a,c   Rush, Karena S ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Assoc of Univ Centers on Disabil   (United States)

Author keywords

Competing items; Preference assessment; Stimulus engagement

Indexed keywords

CAREGIVER; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; DECISION MAKING; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MOTIVATION; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REINFORCEMENT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MENTAL RETARDATION; MOTIVATION; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 5044248588     PISSN: 01454455     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145445503259836     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-533.
2. DeLeon, I. G., Iwata, B. A., Conners, J., & Wallace, M. D. (1999). Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 111-114.
3. Fisher, W. W. Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 15-25.
4. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498.
5. Green, C. W., Reid, D. H., Canipe, V. S., & Gardner, S. M. (1991). A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 537-552.
6. Green, C. W., Reid, D. H., White, L. K., Halford, R. C., Brittain, D. P., & Gardner, S. M. (1988). Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: Staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 31-43.
7. Hagopian, L. P., Rush, K. S., Lewin, A. B., & Long, E. S. (2001). Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 475-486.
8. Matson, J. L., Bielecki, J. A., Mayville, E. A., Smalls, Y., Bamburg, J. W., & Baglio, C. S. (1999). The development of a reinforcer choice assessment scale for persons with severe and profound mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 379-384.
9. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255.
10. Paclawskyj, T. R., & Vollmer, T. R. (1995). Reinforcer assessment for children with developmental disabilities and visual impairment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 219-224.
11. Parsons, M. B., & Reid, D. H. (1990). Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: Providing opportunities to make choices. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 183-195.
12. Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., Hagopian, L. P., Bowman, L. G., & Toole, L. (1996). Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 1-9.
13. Ringdahl, J. E., Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., & Roane, H. S. (1997). An analogue evaluation of environmental enrichment: The role of stimulus preference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 203-216.
14. Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620.
15. Roscoe, E. M., Iwata, B. A., & Kahng, S. W. (1999). Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: Implications for preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 479-493.
16. Windsor, J., Piche, L. M., & Locke, P. A. (1994). Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 439-455.