The self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Austrian field sample;Der selbstbeurteilungsbogen des SDQ anhand einer österreichischen feldstichprobe

Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 265-271

  Altendorfer Kling, Ulrike ^a   Ardelt Gattinger, Elisabeth ^c   Thun Hohenstein, Leonhard ^a,b  

^a Division für Klinische Genetik   (Austria)

^b Institut für Fortbildung und Forschung in der Kinder und Jugendpsychiatrie   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Psychosocial symptoms; Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; EMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOSOCIAL DISORDER; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; AFFECTIVE SYMPTOMS; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER WITH HYPERACTIVITY; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR DISORDERS; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT;

EID: 34548436652     PISSN: 14224917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1422-4917.35.4.265     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ardelt-Gattringer, E. & Meindl, M. (2007). Testsystem zur Diagnostik und Evaluation bei Adipositas. Bern: Huber.
2. Becker, A., Hagenberg, N., Roessner, V., Woerner, W. & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adult informants? European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 17-24.
3. Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586.
4. Goodman, R. (1999). The Extended Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatr and Allied Disciplines, 40, 791-799.
5. Goodman, R., Ford, T., Corbin, T. & Meltzer, H. (2004). Using the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) multi-informant algorhithm to screen looked-after children for psychiatric disorders. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 25-31.
6. Goodman, R., Meltzer, H. & Bailey, V. (1998). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 7, 125-130.
7. Goodman, R., Meltzer, H. & Bailey, V. (2003). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. International Review of Psychiatry, 15, 173-177.
8. Goodman, R. & Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Beavior Check List: is small beautiful. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 17-24.
9. Kersting, M. (2006). Zur Beurteilung der Qualität von Tests: Resumee und Neubeginn. Psychologische Rundschau, 57, 243-253.
10. Klasen, H., Woerner, W., Rothenberger, A. & Goodman, R. (2003). The German version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) - Overview over first validation and normative studies. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 52, 491-502.
11. Klasen, H., Woerner, W., Wolke, D., Meyer, R., Overmeyer, S., Kaschnitz, W., Rothenberger, A. & Goodman, R. (2000). Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 277-284.
12. Koskelainen, M., Sourander, A. & Kaljonen, A. (2000). The strength and difficulties questionnaire among Finnish school-aged children and adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 277-284.
13. Koskelainen, M., Sourander, A. & Vauras, M. (2001). Self reported strengths and difficulties in a community sample of Finnish adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 10, 180-185.
14. Mellor, D. (2004). Furthering the use of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: reliability with younger child respondents. Psychological Assessment, 16, 396-401.
15. Muris, P., Meesters, C., Eijkelenboom, A. & Vincken, M. (2004). The self report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: its psychometric properties in 8-13 year old non-clinical children. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 437-448.
16. Ronning, J. A., Handegaard, B. H., Sourander, A. & Morch, W. T. (2004). The Strength and Difficutlies Self Report Questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community sample. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 73-82.
17. Van Roy, B., Groholt, B., Heyerdahl, S. & Clench-Aas, J. (2006). Self reported strengths and difficulties in a large Norwegian population 10-19 years. Age and gender specific results of the extended SDQ-questionnaire. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15, 189-198.
18. Widenfelt, B. M., Goedhart, A. W., Treffers, P. D. A. & Goodman, R. (2003). Dutch version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 281-289.
19. Youth in Mind. (21-1-2001). Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. http://www.sdqinfo.com/.