A study on the fabrication of curved surfaces using magnetorheological fluid finishing

International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

Volumn 47, Issue 14, 2007, Pages 2077-2090

  Seok, Jongwon ^a   Kim, Yong Jae ^b   Jang, Kyung In ^b   Min, Byung Kwon ^b   Lee, Sang Jo ^b  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Curved surface; Micromachining; Radius of curvature; Response surface methodology (RSM)

Indexed keywords

FABRICATION; FINISHING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RHEOLOGY; SILICON;

CURVED SURFACES; MILLIMETER-SCALE STRUCTURES; RADIUS OF CURVATURE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY (RSM);

SURFACES;

EID: 34548317439     PISSN: 08906955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Yang M.Y., and Lee H.C. Local material removal mechanism considering curvature effect in the polishing process of the small aspherical lens die. Journal of Material Processing Technology 116 (2001) 298-304
2. Golini D., Jacobs S., Kordonski W., and Dumas P. Precision optics fabrication using magnetorheological finishing. Advanced Materials for Optics and Precision Structures CR 67 (1997) 251-274
3. Zantye P.B., Kumar A., and Sikder A.K. Chemical mechanical planarization for microelectronics applications. Material Science and Technology R 45 (2004) 89-220
4. Jha S., and Jain V.K. Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 44 (2004) 1019-1029
5. S.D. Jacobs, W. Kordonski, I.V. Prokhorov, D. Golini, G.R. Gorodkin, T.D. Strafford, Magnetorheological fluid composition, US Patent No. 5,804,095, 1998.
6. Genc S., and Phule P.P. Rheological properties of magnetorheological fluids. Smart Materials Structures 11 (2002) 140-146
7. Shorey A.B., Jacobs S.D., Kordonski W.I., and Gans R.F. Experiments and observation regarding the mechanism of glass removal in magnetorheological finishing. Applied Optics 40 (2001) 20-33
8. W. Kordonski, S.D. Jacobs, Magnetorheological finishing, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on ER Fluids, MR Suspensions, 1985, pp. 1-12.
9. Golini D., Schneider G., Flug P., and DeMarco M. Magnetorheological finishing. Optics & Photonic News 12 (2001) 20-24
10. Kim W.B., Lee S.H., and Min B.K. Surface finishing and evaluation of three-dimensional silicon microchannel using magnetorheological fluid. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 126 (2004) 772-778
11. Montgomery D.C., and Myers R.H. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments. second ed. (1995), Interscience-Wiley, New York
12. Chavez-Valencia L.E., Manzano-Ramirez A., Luna-Barcenas G.., and Alonso-Guzmam E. Modelling of the performance of asphalt pavement using response surface methodology. Building and Environment 40 (2005) 1140-1149
13. Gunaraj V., and Murugan N. Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 88 (1999) 266-275
14. Onwubolu G.C., and Kumar S. Response surface methodology-based approach to CNC drilling operations. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 171 (2006) 41-47
15. Öktem H., Erzurumlu T., and Kurtaran H. Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of cutting conditions for surface roughness. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 170 (2005) 11-16
16. T. Simon, F. Reitich, Modeling and computation of the overall magnetic properties of magnetorheological fluids, in: Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Decision & Control, San Diego, CA, 1997, pp. 3721-3726.
17. Archad J.F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. Journal of Applied Physics 24 (1953) 981-988
18. Y. Ku, Y. Jeon, J. Kim, D. Lee, improvement of feasibility of design space using response surface and Kriging method, in: 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, New York, 2004, pp. 30-1.
19. Janocha H. Adaptronics and Smart Structures-Basics, Materials, Design, and Applications (1999), Springer (pp. 180-238)
20. Ansoft Corporation, Maxwell 2D Program 〈www.ansoft.com〉.
21. Lord Corporation, Magneto-Rheologcial (MR) Technology 〈www.lord.com〉.
22. Cheng D.K. Fundamentals of Engineering Electromagnetics (1993), Addison-Wesley Series in Electrical Engineering
23. SAS Library: Nonlinear Regression in SAS 〈http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/library/SASNLinos.htm〉.
24. Rawlings J.O. Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool (1998), Springer, Berlin
25. Luo Q., Ramarajan S., and Babu S.V. Modification of the Preston equation for the chemical-mechanical polishing of copper. Thin Solid Film 335 (1998) 160-167
26. Jacobs S.D., Arrasmith S.A., Kozhinova I.A., Gregg L.L., Shorey A.B., and Romanofsky H.J. An overview of magnetorheological finishing (MRF) for precision optics manufacturing. Ceramic Transactions 102 (1999) 185-199
27. Kim A.T., Seok J.W., Tichy J.A., and Cale T.S. Soft elastohydrodynamic lubrication with roughness. Journal of Tribology 125 (2003) 448-451
28. Seok J.W., Sukam C.P., Kim A.T., Tichy J.A., and Cale T.S. Multi-scale material removal modeling of chemical mechanical polishing. Wear 254 (2003) 307-320
29. Rabinowicz E. Friction and Wear of Materials (1995), Wiley, New York
30. Shorey A.B., Jacobs S.D., Kordonski W.I., and Gans R.F. Experiments and observations regarding the mechanisms of glass removal in magnetorheological finishing. Applied Optics 40 (2001) 20-33