Classroom variables and access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities

Exceptional Children

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 101-120

  Soukup, Jane H ^a,c,d   Wehmeyer, Michael L ^a,c,d,e   Bashinski, Susan M ^a,c   Bovaird, James A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^d Department of Special Education ^*  (United States)

^e Center on Developmental Disabilities

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548279787     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440290707400106     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agran, M., Alper, S., & Wehmeyer, M. (2002). Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers, Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 123-133.
2. Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Scanlon, D. (2002). Procedural facilitators and cognitive strategies: Tools for unraveling the mysteries of comprehension and the writing process and for providing meaningful access to the general curriculum. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 17, 65-77.
3. Bashinski, S. M., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2002). Access CISSAR (version 1.0) [Computer software]. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
4. Bulgren, J. A., & Carta, J. J. (1993). Examining the instructional contexts of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 182-191.
5. Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., Schulte, D., ArreagaMayer, C., & Terry, B. (1988). Code fir instructional structure and student academic response: Mainstream version (MS-CISSAR). Kansas City, KS: Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Bureau of Child Research, University of Kansas.
6. Cobb-Morocco, C. (2001). Teaching for understanding with students with disabilities: New directions for research on access to the general education curriculum, Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 5-11.
7. De La Paz, S., & MacArthur, C. (2003). Knowing the how and why of history: Expectations for secondary students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 142-154.
8. Deshler, D., Shumaker, J., Bulgren, J., Lenz, K., Jantzen, J., Adams, G., et al. (2001). Making learning easier: Connecting new knowledge to things students already know. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 33(4), 82-85.
9. Dymond, S. K., & Orelove, F. P. (2001). What constitutes an effective curriculum for students with severe disabilities? Exceptionality, 9, 109-122.
10. Ford, A., Davern, L., & Schnorr, R. (2001). Learners with significant disabilities: Curricular relevance in an era of standards-based reform. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 214-222.
11. Giangreco, M. F., (2003). Working with paraprofessionals. Educational Leadership, 1(2), 50-53.
12. Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2005). Writing better: Effective strategies fir teaching students with learning difficulties. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
13. Greenwood, C., R., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Carta, J. J. (1994). Identification and translation of effective, teacher-developed instructional procedures for general practice. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 140-151.
14. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Rager, A. (1991). The behavior analyst consulting model: Identifying and validating naturally effective instructional procedures. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(4), 165-191.
15. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Kamps, D., & ArreagaMayer, C. (1990). Ecobehavioral analysis of classroom instruction. In S. Schroeder (Ed.), Ecobehavioral analysis and developmental disabilities (pp. 33-63). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Kamps, D., Delquadri, J., Terry, B., Finney, R., et al. (1997). Ecobehavioral assessment systems software: (EBASS). Practitioner's Manual (Version 3.0). Kansas City, KS: Juniper Gardens Children's Project, University of Kansas.
17. Hartmann, D. P., & Woods, D. D. (1982). Observational methods. In A. S. Bellack, M. Hersen, & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), International handbook of behavior therapy (pp. 109-138). New York: Plenum.
18. Hunt, P., Farron-Davis, F., Beckstead, S., Curtis, D., & Goetz, L. (1994), Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200-214.
19. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C § 1400 et seq. (2004).
20. Janney, R., & Snell, M. (2004). Teachers' guides to inclusive practices: Modifying schoolwork (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
21. Jitendra, A. K., Edwards, L., Choutka, C. M., & Treadway, R S. (2002). A collaborative approach to planning in the content areas for students with learning disabilities: Accessing the general curriculum, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 252-267.
22. Kamps, D., Greenwood, C. R., & Leonard, B. (1991). Ecobehavioral assessment in classrooms serving children with autism and developmental disabilities. In R. Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavior assessment of children and families (pp. 203-239). New York: Kingsley.
23. Kamps, D. M, Leonard, B. R., Dugan, E. P., Boland, B., & Greenwood, C R. (1991). The use of ecobehavioral assessment to identify naturally occurring effective procedures in classrooms serving children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 1, 367-397.
24. Lee, S. H., Amos, B. A., Gragoudas, S., Lee, Y., Shogren, K. A., Theoharis, R., et al. (2006). Curriculum augmentation and adaptation strategies to promote access to the general curriculum for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 199-212.
25. Logan, K., Bakeman, R., & Keefe, E. (1997). Effects of instructional variables on engaged behavior of students with disabilities in general education classroom. Exceptional Children, 64, 481-497.
26. Logan, K., & Keefe, E. (1997). A comparison of instructional context, teacher behavior, and engaged behavior for students with severe disabilities in general education and self-contained elementary classrooms. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 22, 16-27.
27. Moerbeek, M., Van Breukelen, G. J. P., Berger, M. P. F., & Ausems, M. (2003). Optimal sample sizes in experimental designs with individuals nested within clusters. Understanding Statistics, 151-175.
28. Nolet, V., & McLaughlin, M. (2000) Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standards-based reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29. Pressley, M. (2005). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
30. Pugach, M. C., & Warger, C L. (2001). Curriculum matters: Raising expectations for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 194-196.
31. Raudenbush, S. W., &| Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Raudenbush, S. W., Spybrook, J., Liu, X., & Congdon, R. (2005). Optimal design for longitudinal and multilevel research: Documentation for the "Optimal Design" software. Unpublished manuscript.
33. Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometric Bulletin, 2, 110-114.
34. Sax, G. (1997). Principles of educational measurement and psychological measurement and evaluation (4th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
35. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
36. Swanson, H., & Deshler, D. (2003). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: Converting a metaanalysis to practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(2), 124-135.
37. Swanson, H., & Hoskyn, M. (2001). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 109-119.
38. Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., Graden, J., & Algozzine, B. (1983). What's "special" about the special education resource room for learning disabled students? Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 283-288.
39. Turnbull, R., Turnbull, A., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2007). Exceptional lives: Special education in today's schools (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
40. Wehmeyer, M. L. (2003). Defining mental retardation and ensuring access to the general curriculum. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 270-281.
41. Wehmeyer, M. L., Lance, G. D., & Bashinski, S. (2002). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A multi-level model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 223-234.
42. Wehmeyer, M. L., Lattin, D., Lapp-Rincker, G., & Agran, M. (2003). Access to the general curriculum of middle school students with mental retardation: An observational study. Remedial and Special Education, 24(5), 262-272.