Teaching for understanding with students with disabilities: New directions for research on access to the general education curriculum

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 5-13

  Morocco, Catherine Cobb ^a  

^a EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035581880     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1511292     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Blythe, T. (and the teachers and researchers of the Teaching for Understanding Project). (1998). The teaching for understanding guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
2. Boix-Mansilla, V. (1995). Rethinking knowledge in schools: The recovery of meaning in disciplinary understanding. ATLAS Seminar, Harvard Project Zero: Harvard University.
3. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R., Hasselbring, T., Kinzer, C., & Williams, S. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro. (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 142-178.
5. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. Carnine, D. (1991). Curricular interventions for teaching higher order thinking to all students: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 261-269.
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19, 2-10.
8. Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375-402.
9. Echevarria, J. (1995). Interactive reading instruction: A comparison of proximal and distal effects of instructional conversations. Exceptional Children, 61(6), 536-552.
10. Englert, C. S., Garmon, A., Mariage, T., Rozendal, M., Tarrant, K., & Urba, J. (1995). The early literacy project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(4), 253-275.
11. Ferretti, R. P., & Okolo, C. M. (1996). Authenticity in learning: Multimedia design projects in the social studies for students with disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(5), 450-460.
12. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. P., Norris, B., Hamlett, C. L., & Karns, K. (1995). Acquisition and transfer effects of classwide peer-assisted learning strategies in mathematics for students with varying learning histories. School Psychology Review, 24(4), 604-620.
13. Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
14. Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Lloyd, J. W. (2000). Designing high quality research in special education: Group experimental design. Journal of Special Education, 34(1), 218.
15. Goldenberg, C. (1992-93). Instructional conversations: Promoting comprehension through discussion. The Reading Teacher, 46(4), 316-326.
16. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191-206.
17. Kendall, J. S., & Marzano, R. J. (1996). A comprehensive guide to designing standards-based districts, schools and classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
18. Klinger, J., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M., Schumm, J., & Elbaum, B. (1998). Outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 153-161.
19. MacArthur, C., Schwartz, S., Graham, S., Molloy, D., & Harris, K. (1996). Integration of strategy instruction into a whole language classroom: A case study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11, 168-176.
20. Malone, L. D., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58(3), 270-279.
21. McLeskey, J., Henry, D., & Axelrod, M. I. (1999). Inclusion of students with learning disabilities: An examination of data from reports to congress. Exceptional Children, 6(1), 55-66.
22. Montague, M. (1997). Cognitive strategy instruction in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 164-172.
23. Morocco, C. C., & Clark-Chiarelli, N. (1998). The teacher's voice in case study methodology. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
24. Morocco, C. C., & Zorfass, J. (1996). Unpacking scaffolding: Supporting students with disabilities in literacy development. In C. Warger & M. Pugach, (Eds.), Curriculum trends, special education and reform: Refocusing the conversation (pp. 164-178). New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Newman, D. (1990). Opportunities for research on the organizational impact of school computers. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 8-13.
26. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G.G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. Madison: Document Service, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
27. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
28. Palincsar, A. S., & Collins, K. M. (in press). Learning skills. In T. Husen & N. Postlewaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education: Research studies, Vol. 2. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
29. Palincsar, A. S., Magnusson, S. J., Marano, N. L., Ford, D., & Brown, N. (1998). Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 519.
30. Palincsar, A. S., & Rupert-Herrenkohl, L. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs. In A. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 151-178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.
31. Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6-11.
32. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., & Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 92, 513-555.
33. Rogoff, B. (1997). Cognition as a collaborative process. In R. S. Siegler & D. Kuhn, (Eds.), Cognition, perception, & language: Vol. 2. Handbook of child psychology (pp. 679-744). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
34. Roseberry, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, R. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms, Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61-94
35. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
36. Voss, J. F., Wiley, J., & Carretero, M. (1995). Acquiring intellectual skills. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 155-181.
37. Wong, B. (1997). Research on genre-specific strategies for enhancing writing in adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(2), 140-159.
38. Woodward, J., & Baxter, J. (1996). The effects of an innovative approach to mathematics on academically low achieving students in inclusive settings. Exceptional Children, 63(3), 373-388.
39. Woodward, J., Baxter, J., & Scheel, C. (1997). It's what you take for granted when you take nothing for granted. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disorders, Vol. 11 (pp. 199-234). New York: JAI Press.
40. Woodward, J., Baxter, J., & Robinson, R. (1999). Rules and reasons: Decimal instruction for academically low achieving students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(1), 15-24.
41. Zigmond, N., Jenkins, J., Fuchs, L., Deno, D., Fuchs, D., Baker, J., Jenkins, L., & Couthino, M. (1995). Special education in restructured schools: Findings from three multi-year studies. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 531-540.