Use of abr threshold and oaes in detection of noise induced hearing loss

Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 95-118

  Fraenkel, Rachel ^a   Freeman, Sharon ^a   Sohmer, Haim ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

ABR; DPOAE; hearing loss; noise; PTS; rat; TEOAE; TTS

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; MALE; NOISE INJURY; NONHUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PERMANENT THRESHOLD SHIFT; RAT; TEMPORARY THRESHOLD SHIFT; TRANSIENT EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; COCHLEA; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; RATS;

EID: 0141928827     PISSN: 07926855     EISSN: 21910286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/JBCPP.2003.14.2.95     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brownell, WE. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 82–92.
2. Marshall, L, Heller, LM. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions as a measure of noise induced threshold shift. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 1319–1334.
3. Dolan, TG, Abbas, PJ. Changes in the 2f1-f2 acoustic emission and whole-nerve response following sound exposure: long-term effects. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 1475–1483.
4. Hotz, MA, Probst, R, Harris, FP, Hauser, R. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113:478–482.
5. Vinck, BM, Van Cauwenberge, PB, Leroy, L, Corthals, P. Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct effects of noise on the human cochlea. Audiology 1999; 38: 44–52.
6. Attias, J, Furst, M, Furman, V, Reshef Haran, I, Horowitz, G, Bresloff, I. Noise induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 612–618.
7. Clark, WW. Recent studies of temporary threshold shift (TTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS) in animals. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 155–163.
8. Nordmann, AS, Bohne, BA, Harding, GW. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res 2000; 139: 13–30.
9. Dew, LA, Owen, RG Jr, Mulroy, MJ. Changes in size and shape of auditory hair cells in vivo during noise induced temporary threshold shift. Hear Res 1993; 66: 99–107.
10. Henry, WR, Mulroy, MJ. Afferent synaptic changes in auditory hair cells during noise-induced temporary threshold shift. Hear Res 1995; 84: 81–90.
11. Puel, JL, Bobbin, RP, Fallon, M. The active process is affected first by intense sound exposure. Hear Res 1988; 37: 53–64.
12. Patuzzi, R. Exponential onset and recovery of temporary threshold shift after loud sound: evidence for long term inactivation of mechano-electrical transduction channels. Hear Res 1998; 125: 17–38.
13. Hamernik, RP, Ahroon, WA, Lei, S-F. The cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the normal and noise damaged chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 1003–1012.
14. Hamernik, RP, Qiu, W. Correlations among evoked potential thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell loss following various noise exposures in the chinchilla. Hear Res 2000; 150: 245–257.
15. Emmerich, E, Richter, F, Reinhold, U, Linss, V, Linss, W. Effects of industrial noise exposure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and hair cell loss of the cochlea-long term experiments in awake guinea pigs. Hear Res 2000; 148: 9–17.
16. Fraenkel, R, Freeman, S, Sohmer, H. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats. Audiol Neurootol 2001;6:40–49.
17. Khvoles, R, Freeman, S, Sohmer, H. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be recorded in the rat. Hear Res 1996; 97: 120–126.
18. Khvoles, R, Freeman, S, Sohmer, H. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in laboratory animals. Audiology 1999; 38: 121–126.
19. Harris, FP, Probst, R, Wegner, R. Repeatability of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology 1991; 30: 135–141.
20. Withnell, RH, Yates, GK, Kirk, DL. Changes to low frequency components of the transient evoked otoacoustic emission following acoustic trauma to the base of the cochlea. Hear Res 2000; 139: 1–12.
21. Avan, P, Bonfils, P, Loth, D, Elbez, M, Erminy, M. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3012–3021.
22. Zheng, J, Ren, T, Parthasarathi, A, Nuttall, AL. Quinine induced alterations of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions and cochlear potentials in guinea pigs. Hear Res 2001; 154: 124–134.
23. Hall, AJ, Lutman, ME. Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology 1999; 38: 277–280.
24. Marshall, L, Heller, LM. Reliability of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1996; 17:237–254.
25. Franklin, DJ, McCoy, MJ, Martin, GK, Lonsbury-Martin, BL. Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 417–429.
26. Zurek, PM, Clark, WW, Kim, DO. The behaviour of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;72:774–780.
27. Schmiedt, RA. Acoustic distortion in the ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1481–1490.
28. Mills, DM, Rubel, EW. Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection. Hear Res 1994; 77: 183–199.
29. Whitehead, ML, Lonsbury-Martin, BL, Martin, GK. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1587–1607.
30. Whitehead, ML, Lonsbury-Martin, BL, Martin, GK. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: II: Differential physiological vulnerability. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 2662–2682.
31. Subramaniam, M, Henderson, D, Spongr, V. The relationship among distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, evoked potential thresholds and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 299–309.
32. Franklin, DJ, Lonsbury-Martin, BL, Stagner, BB, Martin, GK. Altered susceptibility of 2fl-f2 acoustic-distortion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits. Hear Res 1991; 53: 185–208.