Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: A normative study

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 231-245

  Vinck, Bart M ^a   De Vel, Eddy ^a   Xu, Zheng Min ^a   Van Cauwenberge, Paul B ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cochlear physiology; Distortion product; Hearing testing; Otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SCREENING; COCHLEA; EAR; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 0029860761     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206099609071944     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kemp D T. Stimuated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–1391
2. Avan P, Bonfils P. Frequency specificity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 1993; 32: 12–26
3. Brown A M, Gaskill S A, Carlyon R P, Williams D M. Acoustic distortion as a measure of frequency selectivity- relation to psychophysical equivalent rectangular bandwidth. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 6: 3291–3297
4. Brown A M, McDowells B, Forge A. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 1989; 42: 143–156
5. Gaskill S A, Brown A M. The behaviour of the acoustic distortion product, 2fl-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 821–839
6. Harris F P. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 594–600
7. Harris F P, Probst R. Suppression of the 2fl-f2 otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res 1992; 64: 133–141
8. Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Stagner B B, Coats A C, Martin G K. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/fl ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220–229
9. Lasky R, Perlman J, Hecox K. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. Ear Hear 1992; 136: 430–441
10. Lonsbury-Martin B L, Harris F P, Stagner B B, Hawkins M D, Martin G K. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 3–14
11. Lonsbury-Martin B L, Cutler W M, Martin G K. Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 1749–1759
12. Lonsbury-Martin B L, McCoy M J, Whitehead M L, Martin G K. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 1: 11–22
13. Martin G K, Ohms L A, Franklin D J, Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans Ill Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 147: 30–42
14. Plomp R. Detectability thresholds of combination tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1965; 37: 1110–1123
15. Prijs V. Emissies door vervorming. Referaten Boerhave Cursus 1993; 99–107
16. Robles L, Ruggero M A, Rich N C. Two-tone distortion in the basilar membrane of the cochlea. Nature 1991; 6308: 413–44
17. Siegel J H, Kim D O. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear Res 1982; 6: 171–182
18. Schmiedt R A. Acoustic distortion in the ear canal: I Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1481–1490
19. Martin G K, Probst R, Coats A C, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Acoustic distortion products in rabbits II Sites of origin revealed by suppression and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 1987; 28: 191–208
20. Gorga M P, Neely S T, Bergman B, Beauchaine K L, Kaminski J R, Peters J, Jesteadt W. Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: Distortion product responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 2050–2060
21. Kimberley B P. Distortion product emission features and the prediction of pure tone thresholds. Laryngoscope 1995; 105: 349–353
22. Moulin A, Bera J C, Collet L. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1994; 33: 305–326
23. Martin G K, Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Otoacoustic emissions in human ears: normative findings. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 106–119
24. Probst R, Harris F P. Transiently evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions-comparison of results from normally hearing and hearing impaired human ears. Arch Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 1993; 119: 858–860
25. Whitehead M L, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2fl-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 91: 1587–1607
26. Brownell W E. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 82–92
27. Dallos P, Evans B N. High frequency motility of outer hair cells and the cochlear amplifier. Science 1995; 267: 2006–2009
28. Dallos P, Hallworth R, Evans B N. Theory of electrically driven shape changes of outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol 1993; 70: 299–323
29. Whitehead M L, Stagner B B, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98: 3200–3214
30. Kok M R, Van Zanten G A, Brocaar M P, Wallenburg H CS. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in 1036 ears of healthy newborns. Audiol 1993; 32: 213–224
31. Tilanus C C. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in clinical practice. Doctoral Thesis Utrecht 1996