Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 20, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 4701-4707

  Maison, Stéphane F ^a   Liberman, M Charles ^a,b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlea; Damage; Ear; Efferents; Noise induced hearing loss; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; EFFERENT NERVE; GUINEA PIG; MALE; NOISE INJURY; NONHUMAN; OLIVOCOCHLEAR REFLEX; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLEX ARC;

EID: 0034660128     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.20-12-04701.2000     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Wen H, Szabo P, Cecola RP, Righy P, Jackson DF (1993) Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 71:1-11.
2. Burns W (1968) Effects of noise on man. London: Clowes W and Sons.
3. Cody AR, Robertson D (1983) Variability of noise-induced damage in the guinea pig cochlea: electrophysiological and morphological correlates after strictly controlled exposures. Hear Res 9:55-70.
4. Elgoyhen AB, Johnson DS, Boulter J, Vetter DE, Heinemann S (1994) α9: An acetylcholine receptor with novel pharmacological properties expressed in rat cochlear hair cells. Cell 79:705-715.
5. EPA (1981) Noise in America: the extent of the noise problem. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
6. Eyhalin M (1993) Neurotransmitters and neuromodulators of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 73:309-373.
7. Galambos R (1956) Suppression of auditory activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to the cochlea. J Neurophysiol 19:424-437.
8. Guinan JJ (1996) The physiology of olivocochlear efferents. In: The cochlea (Dallos PJ, Popper AN, Fay RR, eds), pp 435-491. New York: Springer.
9. Kemp DT (1986) Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 22:95-104.
10. Kim DO (1980) Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations. Hear Res 2:297-317.
11. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (1997) Conditioning-related protection from acoustic injury: Effects of chronic de-efferentation and sham surgery. J Neurophysiol 78:3095-3106.
12. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (1998) Olivocochlear reflex effects on DPOAE amplitude in anesthetized guinea pigs. Abstracts of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 21:139.
13. Kujawa SG, Glattke TJ, Fallon M, Bobbin RP (1994) A nicotinic-like receptor mediates suppression of distortior product otoacoustic emissions by contralateral sound. Hear Res 74:1-13.
14. Liberman MC (1988a) Physiology of cochlear efferent and afferent neurons: direct comparisons in the same animal. Hear Res 34:179-192.
15. Liberman MC (1988b) Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise. J Neurophysiol 60:1779-1798.
16. Liberman MC (1990) Effects of chronic cochlear de-efferentation on auditory-nerve response. Hear Res 49:209-224.
17. Liberman MC, Mulroy MJ (1982) Acute and chronic effects of acoustic trauma. Cochlear pathology and auditory nerve pathophysiology. In: New perspectives on noise-induced hearing loss (Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi R, eds), pp 105-136. New York: Raven.
18. Liberman MC, Puria S, Guinan JJ (1996) The ipsilaterally evoked olivocochlear reflex causes rapid adaptation of the 2f1-f2 DPOAE. J Acoust Soc Am 99:3572-3584.
19. Muragasu E, Russell IJ (1996) The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. J Neurosci 16:325-332.
20. Nieder P, Nieder I (1970) Stimulation of efferent olivocochlear bundle causes release from low level masking. Nature 227:184-185.
21. Oatman LC, Anderson BW (1977) Effects of visual attention on tone burst evoked auditory potentials. Exp Neurol 57:200-211.
22. 2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. J Acoust Soc Am 87:1630-1635.
23. Rajan R (1988) Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters. J Neurophysiol 60:549-568.
24. Rajan R (1991) Protective functions of the efferent pathways to the mammalian cochlea: a review. In: Noise-induced hearing loss (Dancer DHA, Salvi RJ, Hamernik RP, eds). St. Louis: Mosby.
25. Rajan R (1995) Frequency and loss dependence of the olivocochlear pathway in cats. J Neurophysiol 74:582-598.
26. Reiter ER, Liberman MC (1995) Efferent-mediated protection from acoustic overexposure: Relation to slow effects of olivocochlear stimulation. J Neurophysiol 73:506-514.
27. Saunders JC, Dear SP, Schneider ME (1985) The anatomical consequences of acoustic injury: a review and tutorial. J Acoust Soc Am 78:833-860.
28. Siegel JH, Kim DO (1982) Efferenty neural control of cochlear mechanics? Oliocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear Res 6:171-182.
29. 2. J Neurophysiol 47:303-328.
30. Sridhar TS, Liberman MC, Brown MC, Sewell WF (1995) A novel cholinergic "slow effect" of efferent stimulation on cochlear potentials in the guinea pig. J Neurosci 15:3667-3678.
31. Sridhar TS, Brown MC, Sewell WF (1997) Unique postsynaptic signaling at the hair cell efferent synapse permits calcium to evoke changes on two time scales. J Neurosci 17:428-437.
32. Vetter DE, Liberman MC, Mann J, Barhanan J, Boulter J, Brown MC, Saffiote-Kolman J, Heinemann SF (1999) Role of alpha-9 nicotinic receptor subunits in the development and function of cochlear efferent innervation. Neuron 23:93-103.
33. Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R (1991) Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: Dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 65:724-735.
34. Ward WD (1965) The concept of susceptibility to hearing loss. J Occup Med 7:595-607.
35. Warr WB, Guinan JJ, White JS (1986) Organization of the efferent fibers: the lateral and medial olivocochlear systems. In: Neurobiology of hearing: the cochlea (Altschuler RA, Hoffman DW, eds). New York: Raven.
36. Warren EH, Liberman MC (1989) Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. I. Contributions of cochlear efferents. Hear Res 37:89-104.
37. Wiederhold ML (1970) Variations in the effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cat single auditory-nerve-fiber responses to tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am 48:966-977.
38. Wiederhold ML, Kiang NYS (1970) Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 48:950-965.
39. Yoshida N, Vetter D, Heinemann S, Liberman MC (1999) Mice lacking α9 acetylcholine receptors have normal vulnerability to acoustic injury. Soc Neurosci Abstr 25:133.
40. Zheng XY, Henderson D, Hu BH, Ding DL, McFadden SL (1997a) The influence of the cochlear efferent system on chronic acoustic trauma. Hear Res 107:147-159.
41. Zheng XY, Henderson D, McFadden SL, Hu BH (1997b) The role of the cochlear efferent system in acquired resistance to noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 104:191-203.