Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: No risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions

Laryngoscope

Volumn 113, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1216-1223

  Wagner, Wolfgang ^a   Staud, Irene ^a   Frank, Gerhard ^a   Dammann, Florian ^a   Plontke, Stefan ^a   Plinkert, Peter K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Distortion product; Magnetic resonance imaging; Noise; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BASILAR MEMBRANE; COCHLEA DUCT; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EAR PROTECTION; EQUIPMENT; EXPOSURE; HAIR CELL; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROPHONE; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SOUND PRESSURE;

EID: 0037489725     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200307000-00020     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Quirk ME, Letendre AJ, Ciottone RA, Lingley JF. Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging. Radiology 1989;170:463-466.
2. Brummett RE, Talbot JM, Charuhas P. Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. Radiology 1988;169:539-540.
3. Zwicker E, Schorn K, Vogl T. Zeitlich begrenzte Schwellenverschiebung nach Kernspintomographie. Laryngorhinootologie 1990;69:413-416.
4. Radomskij P, Schmidt MA, Heron CW, Prasher D. Effect of MRI noise on cochlear function. Lancet 2002;359:1485-1486.
5. Clark WW, Bohne BA. Animal model for the 4-kHz tonal dip. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1978;51:1-16.
6. Hamernik RP, Patterson JH, Turrentine GA, Ahroon WA. The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing thresholds. Hear Res 1989;38:199-211.
7. Davis H, Morgan CT, Hawkins JE, Galambos R, Smith F. Temporary deafness following exposure to loud tones and noise. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1950;88:58.
8. Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Probst R, Scheinin SA, Coats AC. Acoustic distortion products in rabbits, II: sites of origin revealed by suppression and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 1987;28:191-208.
9. Engdahl B, Kemp DT. The effect of noise on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:1573-1587.
10. Kemp DT. Cochlear echoes: implications for noise-induced hearing loss. In: Hamernik RP, Salvi R, eds. New Perspectives in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York: Raven, 1982:189-206.
11. Zwicker E. On peripheral processing in normal hearing. In: Klinke R, Hartmann R, eds. Hearing: Physiological Bases and Psychophysics. New York: Springer Verlag, 1983: 104-110.
12. Franklin DJ, Lonsbury-Martin ML, Stagner BB, Martin GK. Altered susceptibility of 2f1-f2 acoustic-distortion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits. Hear Res 1991;53:185-208.
13. Marshall L, Heller LM. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions as a measure of noise-induced threshold shift. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998;41:1319-1334.
14. Liebel J, Delb W, Andes C, Koch A. Die Erfassung von Lärmschäden bei Besuchern einer Diskothek mit Hilfe der TEOAE und DPOAE. Laryngorhinootologie 1996;75: 259-264.
15. Norton SJ, Harrison WA, Mascher KE. Effects of brief exposure to intense sound on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans. Abstr Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1997;20:98.
16. Attias J, Furst M, Furman V, Reshef I, Horowitz G, Bresloff I. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995;16:612-618.
17. Hotz MA, Probst R, Harris FP, Hauser R. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993;113:478-482.
18. Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears, II: asymmetry in L1, L2 space. J Am Speech Assoc 1995;97: 2359-2377.
19. Harris FP, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;85:220-229.
20. Lasky RE. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults, I: frequency effects. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:981-991.
21. Goldman AM, Gossman WE, Friedlander PC. Reduction of sound levels with antinoise in MR imaging. Radiology 1989;173:549-550.
22. Hurwitz R, Lane SR, Bell RA, Brant-Zawadzki MN. Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging. Radiology 1989;173:545-548.
23. Langkowski JH, Thiele F, Maas R, Kooijman H. Messungen zur Geräuschbelastung in der MR-Tomographie bei 1,5 Tesla Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1989;151:483-486.
24. McJury M, Blug A, Joerger C, Condon B, Wyper D. Short communication: acoustic noise levels during magnetic resonance imaging scanning at 1.5 T. Br J Radiol 1994;67: 413-415.
25. Sellers MB, Pavlidis JD, Carlberger T. MRI acoustic noise. Int J Neuroradiol 1996;2:549-560.
26. Dieroff HG. Lärmschwerhörigkeit. Fischer Verlag 1994: 250-253.
27. Plinkert PK, Hemmert W, Wagner W, Just K, Zenner HP. Monitoring noise susceptibility - sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions and subjective audiometry. Br J Audiol 1999;33: 367-380.
28. Oeken J, Menz D. Amplitudenveränderungen von Distorsionsprodukten otoakustischer. Emissionen nach akuter Lärmeinwirkung. Laryngorhinootologie 1996;75:265-269.
29. Engdahl B. Effects of noise and exercise on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996;93:72-82.
30. Liberman MC. Chronic ultrastructural changes in acoustical trauma: serial-section reconstruction of stereocilia and cuticular plates. Hear Res 1987;26:65-88.
31. Liberman MC, Dodds LW. Acute ultrastructural changes in acoustical trauma: serial-section reconstruction of stereocilia and cuticular plates. Hear Res 1987;26:45-64.
32. Patuzzi R. Exponential onset and recovery of temporary threshold shift after loud sound: evidence for long-term inactivation of mechano-electrical transduction channels. Hear Res 1998;125:17-38.
33. Frank G, Kössl M. Acoustical and electrical biasing of the cochlea partition: effects on the acoustic two tone distortions f2-f1 and 2f1-f2. Hear Res 1997;113:57-68.
34. Hirsh IJ, Ward WD. Recovery of the auditory threshold after strong acoustic stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1952;24: 131-141.
35. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1986;22:95-104.
36. Kirk DL, Patuzzi R. Transient changes in cochlear potentials and DPOAEs after low-frequency tones: the 'two-minute bounce' revisited. Hear Res 1997;112:49-68.
37. Kirk DL, Moleirinho A, Patuzzi RB. Microphonic and DPOAE measurements suggest a micromechanical mechanism for the 'bounce' phenomenon following low-frequency tones. Hear Res 1997;112:69-86.
38. Pickles JO, Osborne MP, Cornis SD. Vulnerability of tip links between stereocilia to acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1987;25:173-183.
39. Saunders JC, Canlon B, Flock A. Growth of threshold shift in hair cell stereocilia following exposure to intense stimulation. Hear Res 1986;23:245-255.
40. Canlon B. Acoustic overstimulation alters the morphology of the tectorial membrane. Hear Res 1987;30:127-134.
41. Sutton LA, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Whitehead ML. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering f2. Hear Res 1994;75:161-174.