The logic-ITA in the classroom: A medium scale experiment

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 41-62

  Yacef, Kalina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Evaluation of ITS; Intelligent teaching assistant; Student data analysis; Web based ITS

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548095064     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: 15604306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abraham, D., Crawford, L., Lesta, L., Merceron, A., & Yacef, K. (2001). The Logic Tutor: a Multimedia Presentation. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 3(2).
2. Abraham, D., & Yacef, K. (2002). Adaptation in the Web-based Logic-ITA. In P. de Bra (Ed.) 2nd International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web Based Systems (AH2002) (pp. 456-461). Malaga, Spain, Springer-Verlag.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. London, Harvard University Press.
4. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
5. Andriessen, J., & Sandberg, J. (1999). Where is Education Heading and How About AI? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 130-150.
6. Boy, G. A. (1991). Intelligent Assistant Systems. London: Academic Press.
7. Corbett, A. T. (2001). Cognitive computer tutors: Solving the two-sigma problem. In M. Bauer, P. J. Gmytrasiewicz & J. Vassileva (Eds.) User Modeling (UM2001) (pp. 137-147). Sonthofen, Germany. Berlin: Springer.
8. Croy, M. (1999). Graphic Interface Design and Deductive Proof Construction. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(4), 371-386.
9. Croy, M. J. (1989). CAI and Empirical Explorations of Deductive Proof Construction. The Computers and Philosophy Newsletter, 4, 111-127.
10. Cumming, G., & McDougall, A. (2000). Mainstreaming AIED into Education? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 197-207.
11. du Boulay, B., & Luckin., R. (2001). Modelling human teaching tactics and strategies for tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12(3), 235-256.
12. Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.
13. Habeshaw, S., Gibbs, G., & Habshaw, T. (1992). 53 Problems with Large Classes. Making the Best of a Bad Job. Bristol, Technical & Educational Services.
14. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999). Students’ Frustrations with a Web-Based Distance Education Course. First Monday, 4(12).
15. Jean, S. (2000). Pépite: un système d’assistance au diagnostic de compétences, PhD, University of Le Mans, Le Mans.
16. Kay, J. (2000). Accretion representation for scrutable student modelling. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson & K. VanLehn (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS’2000) (pp. 514-523). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Kinshuk, Tretiakov, A., Hong, H., & Patel, A. (2001). Human Teacher in Intelligent Tutoring System: A Forgotten Entity! In T. Okamoto et al (Eds.) Advanced Learning Technology: Issues, Achievements and Challenges. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
18. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
19. Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E. Baker & H. O’Neil (Eds.) Technology assessment in education and training. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. London: Routledge Flamer.
21. Leroux, P., Vivet, M., & Brezillon, P. (1996). Cooperation between a Pedagogical Assistant, a Group of Learners and a Teacher. European Conference on AI in Education (pp. 379-385). Lisbon, Portugal.
22. Lesta, L., & Yacef, K. (2002). An Intelligent Teaching-Assistant System for Logic. In S. Cerri & F. Paraguo (Eds.) International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS’02) (pp. 421-431). Biarritz, France. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
23. Mark, M. A., & Greer, J. E. (1995). The VCR tutor: Effective Instruction for device operation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 209-246.
24. Merceron, A., & Yacef, K. (2003). A Web-based Tutoring Tool with Mining Facilities to Improve Learning and Teaching. In F. Verdejo & U. Hoppe (Eds.) 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 201-208). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
25. Merceron, A., & Yacef, K. (2004). Clustering students to help evaluate learning. In J.-P. Courtat, C. Davarakis & T. Villemur (Eds.) Proceedings of TeL’04-Technology Enhanced Learning, 18th IFIP World Computer Congress (pp. 31-42). Toulouse, France. Kluwer Press.
26. Pittinsky, M. S. (2003). The Wired Tower: Perspectives on the Impact of the Internet on Higher Education. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
27. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules and knowledge: signals, signs and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3, 257-266.
28. Scheines, R., & Sieg, W. (1994). Computer environments for proof construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 4(2), 159-169.
29. Sweller, J. (1993). Some cognitive processes and their consequences for the organisation and presentation of information. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 1-8.
30. Van Labeke, N. (1999). Prise en compte de l’usager enseignant dans la conception des EIAO, Illustration dans Calques 3D. PhD dissertation, Universite Henri Poincare, Nancy I, Nancy.
31. Virvou, M., & Moundridou, M. (2001). Adding an Instructor Modelling Component to the Architecture of ITS Authoring Tools. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 185-211.
32. Vivet, M. (1992). Uses of ITS: which role for the teacher? In E. Costa (Ed.) New Directions for Intelligent Tutoring Systems (F91). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
33. Yacef, K. (1999). Vers un assistant tutoriel intelligent pour la formation d’opérateurs de systèmes complexes. PhD dissertation, University of Paris 5, Paris, France.
34. Yacef, K. (2002). Intelligent Teaching Assistant Systems. In Kinshuk (Ed.) International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE’02) (pp. 136-140). Auckland, New Zealand.