Relationships among durum wheat accessions. I. Comparative analysis of SSR, AFLP, and phenotypic data

Genome

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 373-384

  Maccaferri, M ^a   Stefanelli, S ^a   Rotondo, F ^a   Tuberosa, R ^a   Sanguineti, M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

AFLPs; Genetic relationships; Germplasm; Morpho physiological traits; SSRs; Triticum durum (Desf.)

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; VARIABLE NUMBER OF TANDEM REPEAT; WHEAT;

ALLELES; MINISATELLITE REPEATS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; TRITICUM;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM; TRITICUM TURGIDUM SUBSP. DURUM;

EID: 34547953342     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/G06-151     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ajmone-Marsan, P., Castiglioni, P., Ferrarini, M., Van Vijk, R., and Motto, M. 1999. Polymorphism, distribution, and segregation of EcoRI and PstI based AFLP markers in a molecular linkage map in maize. Maize Genet. Coop. News Lett. 73: 13.
2. Autrique, E., Nachit, M.M., Monneveux, P., Tanksley, S.D., and Sorrells, M.E. 1996. Genetic diversity in durum wheat based on RFLPs, morphophysiological traits and coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci. 36: 735-742.
3. Bassam, B.J., Caetano-Anolles, G., and Gresshoff, P.M. 1991. Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 196: 80-83. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(91)90120-I.
4. Bernardo, R., Romero-Severson, J., Ziegle, J., Hauser, J., Joe, L., Hookstra, G., and Doerge, R.W. 2000. Parental contribution and coefficient of coancestry among maize inbreds: pedigree, RFLP, and SSR data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 552-556.
5. Brugmans, B., Hutten, R.G., Rookmaker, A.N., Visser, R.G., and van Eck, H.J. 2005. Exploitation of a marker dense linkage map of potato for positional cloning of a wart disease resistance gene. Theor. Appl. Genet. 29: 1-9.
6. Burstin, J., and Charcosset, A. 1997. Relationship between phenotypic and marker distances: theoretical and experimental investigations. Heredity, 79: 477-483. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6882270.
7. Castiglioni, P., Pozzi, C., Heun, M., Terzi, V., Müller, K.J., Rohde, W., and Salamini, F. 1998. An AFLP-based procedure for the efficient mapping of mutations and DNA probes in barley. Genetics, 149: 2039-2056.
8. Dilmann, C., Charcosset, A., Goffinet, B., Smith, J.S.C., and Dattée, Y. 1997. Best linear unbiased estimators of the molecular genetic distance between inbred lines. Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the EUCARPIA Section Biometrics in Plant Breeding. 14-16 May 1997, Poznan, Poland. In Advances in biomedical genetics. Edited by P. Krajewski and Z. Kaczmarek. Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan. pp. 105-110.
9. Eujayl, I., Sorrells, M.E., Baum, M., Wolters, P., and Powell, W. 2002. Isolation of EST-derived microsatellite markers for genotyping the A and B genomes of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 399-407. doi:10.1007/ s001220100738.
10. Figliuolo, G., and Spagnoletti-Zeuli, P.L. 2000. A nested analysis to detect relationships between genetic markers and germplasm classes of durum wheat. Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl. 124: 44-50.
11. Gower, J.C. 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27: 857-871. doi:10.2307/2528823.
12. Graner, A., Ludwig, W.F., and Melchinger, A.E. 1994. Relationships among European barley germplasm: II. Comparison of RFLP and pedigree data. Crop Sci. 34: 1199-1205.
13. Heckenberger, M., Bohn, M., Klein, D., and Melchinger, A.E. 2005a. Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines: II. Morphological distances and heterosis in comparison with simple sequence repeat and amplified fragment length polymorphism data in maize. Crop Sci. 45: 1132-1140. doi:10.2135/ cropsci2004.0111.
14. Heckenberger, M., Bohn, M., and Melchinger, A.E. 2005b. Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines: I. Simple Sequence Repeat data from maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 45: 1120-1131. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0110.
15. Henry, R.J. 2001. Plant genotyping: the DNA fingerprinting of plants. CABI Publishing, New York.
16. Klein, P.E., Klein, R.R., Cartinhour, S.W., Ulanch, P.E., Dong, J., Obert, J.A., et al. 2000. A high-throughput AFLP-based method for constructing integrated genetic and physical maps: progress toward a sorghum genome map. Genome Res. 10: 789-807. doi:10.1101/gr.10.6.789.
17. Lee, S., Devos, K., and Penner, G. 1995. Characterization of loci containing microsatellite sequences among Canadian wheat cultivars. Genome, 38: 1037-1040.
18. Lombard, V., Dubreuil, P., Dilmann, C., and Baril, C. 2001. Genetic distance estimators based on molecular data for plant registration and protection: a review. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Molecular Markers. Edited by C. Dorè, F. Dosba, and C. Baril. Acta Hortic. 546: 55-64.
19. Lotti, C., Salvi, S., Pasqualone, A., Tuberosa, R., and Blanco, A. 2000. Integration of AFLP markers into an RFLP-based map of durum wheat. Plant Breed. 119: 393-401. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00526.x.
20. Lübbersted, T., Melchinger, A.E., Duble, C., Vuylsteke, M., and Kuiper, M. 2000. Relationships among early European maize inbreds: IV. Genetic diversity revealed with AFLP markers and comparison with RFLP, RAPD, and pedigree data. Crop Sci. 40: 783-791.
21. Maccaferri, M., Sanguineti, M.C., Donini, P., and Tuberosa, R. 2003. Microsatellite analysis reveals a progressive widening of the genetic basis in the elite durum wheat germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 783-797. doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1319-8.
22. Maccaferri, M., Sanguineti, M.C., Noli, E., and Tuberosa, R. 2005. Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a durum wheat elite population. Mol. Breed. 15: 271-290. doi:10.1007/s11032-004-7012-z.
23. Maccaferri, M., Sanguineti, M.C., Xie, C., Smith, J.S.C., and Tuberosa, R. 2007. Relationships among durum wheat accessions. II. A comparison of molecular and pedigree information. Genome, 50: this issue.
24. Melchinger, A.E., Geiger, H.H., Utz, H.F., and Schnell, F.W. 2003. Effect of recombination in the parent populations on the means and combining ability variances in hybrid populations of maize (Zea mays L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 332-340.
25. Melchinger, A.E., Graner, A., Singh, M., and Messmer, M.M. 1994. Relationships among European barley germplasm: I. Genetic diversity among winter and spring cultivars revealed by RFLPs. Crop Sci. 34: 1191-1199.
26. Noli, E., Salvi, S., and Tuberosa, R. 1997. Comparative analysis of genetic relationships in barley based on RFLP and RAPD markers. Genome, 40: 607-616.
27. Nuel, G., Baril, C., and Robin, S. 2001. Varietal distinctness assisted by molecular markers: a methodological approach. Acta Hortic. 546: 65-72.
28. Parisseaux, B., and Bernardo, R. 2004. In silico mapping of quantitative trait loci in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 508-514.
29. Pejic, I., Ajmone-Marsan, P., Morgante, M., Kozumplick, V., Castiglioni, P., Taramino, G., and Motto, M. 1998. Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs, and AFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 1248-1255. doi:10.1007/s001220051017.
30. Plaschke, J., Ganal, M.W., and Röder, M.S. 1995. Detection of genetic diversity in closely related bread wheat using microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 1001-1007.
31. Powell, W., Morgante, M., Andre, C., Hanafey, M., Vogel, J., Tingey, S., and Rafalsky, A. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol. Breed. 2: 225-238. doi:10.1007/BF00564200.
32. Rakoczy-Trojanowska, M., and Bolibok, H. 2004. Characteristics and comparison of three classes of microsatellite-based markers and their application in plants. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 9: 221-238.
33. Rebourg, C., Gouesnard, B., and Charcosset, A. 2001. Large scale molecular analysis of traditional European maize populations. Relationships with morphological variation. Heredity, 86: 574-587. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540. 2001.00869.x.
34. Reif, J.C., Melchinger, A.E., Xia, X.C., Warburton, M.L., Hoisington, D.A., Vasal, S.K., et al. 2003a. Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize populations. Crop Sci. 43: 1275-1282.
35. Reif, J.C., Melchinger, A.E., Xia, X.C., Warburton, M.L., Hoisington, D.A., Vasal, S.K., et al. 2003b. Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 947-957. doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1333-x.
36. Rohlf, F.J. 1997. NTSYS-pc version 2.0. Exter Press, Setauket, N.Y.
37. Roldàn-Ruiz, I., van Eeuwijk, F.A., Gilliland, T.J., Dubreuil, P., Dillmann, C., Lallemand, J., De Loose, M., and Baril, C.P. 2001. A comparative study of molecular and morphological methods of describing relationships between perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 1138-1150. doi:10.1007/s001220100571.
38. Russell, J.R., Ellis, R.P., Thomas, W.T.B., Waugh, R., Provan, J., Booth, A., et al. 2000. A retrospective analysis of spring barley germplasm development from 'foundation genotypes' to currently successful cultivars. Mol. Breed. 6: 553-568. doi:10.1023/A:1011372312962.
39. Saghai-Maroof, M.A., Soliman, K.M., Jorgensen, R.A., and Allard, R.W. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83: 1757-1761.
40. Senior, M.L., Murphy, J.P., Goodman, M.M., and Stuber, C.W. 1998. Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. Crop Sci. 38: 1088-1098.
41. Smith, J.S.C., Chin, E.C.L., Shu, H., Smith, O.S., Wall, S.J., Senior, M.L., et al. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular marker in maize (Zea mays L.): comparison with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 163-173. doi:10.1007/s001220050544.
42. Smith, J.S.C., Smith, O.S., Bowen, S.L., Tenborg, R.A., and Wall, S.J. 1991. The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize. III A revised scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines utilizing DNA RFLPs. Maydica, 36: 213-226.
43. Sneath, P.H.A., and Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. WH Freeman and Co., San Francisco, Calif.
44. Tivang, J.G., Nienhuis, J., and Smith, O.S. 1994. Estimation of sampling variance of molecular marker data using the bootstrap procedure. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 259-264.
45. Van Eeuwijk, F.A., and Baril, C.P. 2001. Conceptual and statistical issues related to the use of molecular markers for distinctness and essential derivation. In Proceeding International Symposium on molecular markers. Edited by C. Dorè, F. Dosba, and C. Baril. Acta Hortic. 546: 35-54.
46. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Lee, T., Hornes, M., et al. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
47. Vuylsteke, M., Mank, R., Antonise, R., Bastiaans, E., Senior, M.L., Stuber, C.W., et al. 1999. Two high-density AFLP linkage maps of Zea mays L.: analysis of distribution of AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 921-935. doi:10.1007/s001220051399.
48. Vuylsteke, M., Mank, R., Brugmans, B., Stam, P., and Kuiper, M. 2000. Further characterization of AFLP data as a tool in genetic diversity assessments among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Mol. Breed. 6: 265-276. doi:10.1023/A:1009656422272.
49. Yap, I.V., and Nelson, R. 1995. Winboot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI Discussion Paper Series No. 14. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines.