Conceptual and statistical issues related to the use of molecular markers for distinctness and essential derivation: Problemes conceptuels et statistiques lies a l'utilisation de marqueurs moleculaires pour la distinction et la derivation essentielle

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 546, Issue , 2001, Pages 35-53

  Van Eeuwijk, F A ^a   Baril, C P ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b GIP GEVES   (France)

Author keywords

Bootstrap; Distinctness; Essential derivation; Genetic distance; Genetic similarity; Permutation test; Plant variety protection

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007469665     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2001.546.1     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baril C.P., Verhaegen D., Vigneron P., Bouvet J.-M., and Kremer A., 1997. Structure of specific combining ability between two species of Eucalyptus. I. RAPD data. Theor. appl. Genet., 94: 796-803.
2. Bernardo R., Murigneux A., and Karaman Z., 1996. Marker-based estimates of identity by descent and alikeness in state among maize inbreds. Theor. appl. Genet., 93: 262-267.
3. Bohn M., Utz H.F., and Melchinger A.E., 1999. Genetic similarities among winter wheat cultivars determined on the basis of RFLPs, AFLPs, and SSRs and their use for predicting progeny variance. Crop Sci., 39: 228-237.
4. Burstin J., and Charcosset A., 1997. Relationships between phenotypic and marker distance: Theoretical and experimental investigations. Heredity, 78: 477-483.
5. Camlin M. S., 2001. Possible future roles for molecular techniques in the identification and registration of new plant cultivars. Acta Hort 546.(this issue).
6. Curnow R.N., 1998. Estimating genetic similarities within and between populations. J. Agric. Biol. Env. Statist., 3: 347-358.
7. Digby P.G.N., and Kempton R.A., 1987. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London.
8. Dillmann C., Bar-Hen A., Guérin D., Charcosset A., and Murigneux A., 1997a. Comparison of RFLP and morphological distances between maize Zea mays L. inbred lines. Consequences for germplasm protection purposes. Theor. appl. Genet., 95: 92-102.
9. Dillmann C., Charcosset A., Goffinet B., Smith J.S.C., and Dattée Y., 1997b. Best linear unbiased estimator of the molecular genetic distance between inbred lines. Advances in Biometrical Genetics. Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the EUCARPIA Section Biometrics in Plant Breeding, Poznan , 14-16 May 1997, P. Krajewsky and Z. Kaczmarek (eds.), pp 105-110.
10. Dillmann C., and Guérin D., 1998. Comparison between maize inbred lines: genetic distances in the expert's eye. Agronomie, 18: 659-667.
11. Efron B.J., and Tibshirani R.J., 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, London.
12. Evett I.W., and Weir B.S., 1998. Interpreting DNA evidence, Statistical genetics for forensic scientists. Sinauer, Sunderland.
13. Excoffier L., Smouse P.E., and Quattro J.M., 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131: 479-491.
14. Foulley J.-L., and Hill W.G., 1999. On the precision of estimation of genetic distance. Genet. Sel. Evol., 31: 457-464.
15. Ghérardi M., Mangin B., Goffinet B., Bonnet D., and Huguet T., 1998. A method to measure genetic distance between allogamous populations of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) using RAPD molecular markers. Theor. appl. Genet., 96: 406-412.
16. Gilliland T.J., Coll R., Calsyn E., De Loose M., Van Eijk M.J.T., and Roldán-Ruiz I., 2000. Estimating genetic conformity between related ryegrass (Lolium) varieties, I. Morphology and Biochemical Characterisation. Mol Breed. (in press).
17. Gordon A.D., 1981. Classification. Chapman and Hall, London.
18. Gower J.C., and Krzanowski W.J., 1999. Analysis of distance for structured multivariate data and extensions to multivariate analysis of variance. Appl. Statist., 48: 505-519.
19. Ibanez J., 2001. Mathematical analysis of RAPD data to establish reliability of varietal assignment in vegetatively propagated species. Acta Hort 546,(this issue).
20. Law J.R., Donini P, Koebner R.M.D., Reeves J.C.. and Cooke R.J., 1998. DNA profiling and plant variety registration. 3: The statistical assessment of distinctness in wheat using amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Euphytica 102: 335-342.
21. Law, J.R., Cooke R.J., Reeves J.C., Donini P., and Smith, J.S.C., 1999. Most similar variety comparisons as a grouping tool. Plant Varieties and Seeds, 12: 181-190.
22. Lombard V., Baril C.P., and Zhang D., 2000. Improvement of the precision of genetic estimates between rapeseed cultivars based on AFLP by using information from their position on a consensus linkage map. Plant and animal genome congress, San Diego, USA, 9-13 january.
23. Lombard V., Dubreuil P., Dillmann C., and Baril C.P., 2001. Genetic distance estimators based on molecular data for plant registration and protection: A review. Acta Hort 546, (this issue).
24. Lynch, M. 1988. Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Biol. Evol., 5: 584-599.
25. Lynch M., and Ritland K., 1999. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics, 152: 1753-1766.
26. Manly B.F.J., 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 2nd Edition, Chapman and Hall, London.
27. Nei M., 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
28. Nei M., and Li W.H., 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 76, 5269-73.
29. Nuel G., Robin S., and Baril C.P., 2000. Predicting distances using a linear model: The case of varietal distinctness. Journal of Applied Statistics (in press).
30. Nuel G., Baril C.P. and Robin S., 2001. Varietal distinctness assisted by molecular markers: A methodological approach. Acta Hort 546, (this issue).
31. Prevosti A., Ocana J., and Alonso G., 1975. Distances between populations of Drosophila subobscura based on chromosome arrangement frequencies. Theor. appl. Genet., 45: 231-241.
32. Roldán-Ruiz I., Calsyn E., Gilliland T.J., Coll R., Van Eijk M.J.T., and De Loose M., 2000. Estimating Genetic Conformity Between Related Ryegrass (Lolium) varieties, II. AFLP Characterisation. Mol. Breed. (in press).
33. Roldán-Ruiz I., van Eeuwijk F.A., Gilliland T.J., Dubreuil P., Dillmann C., Lallemand J., De Loose M., and Baril C.P., 2001. A comparative study of molecular and morphological methods of describing relationships between perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties. Theor. appl. Genet., (in press).
34. Sanchez A., Ocana J., and Utzet F., 1995. Sampling theory, estimation, and significance testing for Prevosti's estimate of genetic distance. Biometrics, 51: 1216-1235.
35. UPOV, 1991. International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants, Geneva, Publication No. 221 (E), March 19, 1991.
36. UPOV, 1997a. Use of COYD and COYU. TWC/15/6.
37. UPOV, 1997b. User notes for combined-over-years distinctness and uniformity procedures. TWC/15/7.
38. Van Dongen S., 1995. How should we bootstrap allozyme data-Heredity, 74: 445-447.
39. Van Dongen S., and Backeljau T., 1995. One-and twosample tests for single-locus inbreeding coefficients using the bootstrap. Heredity, 74: 129-135.
40. Weir B.S., 1996. Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer, Sunderland.