Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 107, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 947-957

  Reif, J C ^a   Melchinger, A E ^a   Xia, X C ^c   Warburton, M L ^b   Hoisington, D A ^b   Vasal, S K ^b   Beck, D ^b   Bohn, M ^d   Frisch, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

^c CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic distance; Heterosis; Heterotic groups; Mega environment; SSRs

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; POPULATION STATISTICS;

SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT (SSR);

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

ALLELES; PHENOTYPE; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; VARIATION (GENETICS); ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0141872887     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1333-x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Beck DL, Vasal SK, Crossa J (1991) Heterosis and combining ability among subtropical and temperate intermediate-maturity maize germplasm. Crop Sci 31:68-73
2. Boppenmaier J, Melchinger AE, Seitz G, Geiger HH, Herrmann RG (1993) Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreds. III. Performance of crosses within versus between heterotic groups for grain traits. Plant Breed 111:217-226
3. Brummer EC (1999) Capturing heterosis in forage crop cultivar development. Crop Sci 39:943-954
4. Charcosset A, Lefort-Buson M, Gallais A (1991) Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: a theoretical computation. Theor Appl Genet 81:571-575
5. Charcosset A, Essioux L (1994) The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor Appl Genet 89:336-343
6. CIMMYT (1998) A complete listing of maize germplasm from CIMMYT. Maize Program Special Report, Mexico DF, Mexico
7. Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1948) The components of genetic variance in populations of biparental progenies and their use in estimating the average degree of dominance. Biometrics 4:254-266
8. Cress CE (1966) Heterosis of the hybrid related to gene-frequency differences between two populations. Genetics 53:269-274
9. Crossa J, Vasal SK, Beck DL (1990) Combining ability estimates of CIMMYT tropical late yellow maize germplasm. Maydica 35:273-278
10. Elder JK, Souther EM (1987) Computer-aided analysis of one-dimensional restriction fragments gels. In: Bishop MJ, Rawling CJ (eds) Nucleid acid and protein sequence analysis - a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp 165-172
11. Falconer DS, Mackay TF (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman Group Ltd, London
12. Fisher RA (1921) On the "probable error" of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron 1:1-32
13. Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AEM (2000) Plabsim: software for simulation of marker-assisted backcrossing. J Hered 91:86-87
14. Gardner CO, Eberhart SA (1966) Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22:439-452
15. Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1983) Races of maize. VI. Isozyme variation among races of maize in Bolivia. Maydica 28:169-187
16. Gower JC (1966) Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325-338
17. Hallauer AR, Russell WA, Lamkey KR (1988) Corn breeding. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (eds) Corn and corn improvement, 3rd edn. Agron Monogr 18, ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 463-564
18. Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) A K-means clustering algorithm. Appl Stats 28:100-108
19. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) A language for data analysis and graphics. J Computat Graphical Stats, Vol 5 3:299-314
20. Lamkey KR, Edwards JW (1999) Quantitative genetics of heterosis. Chapter 10. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. CSSA, Madison, Wisconsin
21. Lu H, Bernardo R (2001) Molecular marker diversity among current and historical maize inbreds. Theor Appl Genet 103:613-617
22. Melchinger AE (1993) Use of RFLP markers for analysis of genetic relationship among breeding materials and prediction of hybrid performance. In: International Crop Science I. CSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 621-628
23. Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. Chapter 10. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. CSSA, Madison, Wisconsin
24. Melchinger AE, Gumber RK (1998) Overview of heterosis and heterotic groups in agronomic crops. In: Lamkey KR, Staub JE (eds) Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants, CSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 29-44
25. Melchinger AE, Lee M, Lamkey KR, Woodman WL (1990) Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms: relation to estimated genetic effects in maize inbreds. Crop Sci 30:1033-1040
26. Melchinger AE, Messmer MM, Lee M, Woodman WL, Lamkey KR (1991) Diversity and relationships among US maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci 31:669-678
27. Michalakis Y, Excoffier L (1996) A generic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci. Genetics 142:1061-1064
28. Moll RH, Salhuana WS, Robinson HF (1962) Heterosis and genetic diversity in variety crosses of maize. Crop Sci 2:197-198
29. Moll RH, Longquist JH, Fortuna JV, Johnson EC (1965) The relation of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52:139-144
30. Ron Parra J, Hallauer AR (1997) Utilization of exotic maize germplasm. Plant Breed Rev 14:165-187
31. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgenson R, Allward RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:8014-8018
32. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin, ver 2.0: a software of population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland
33. Senior ML, Murohy MM, Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1998) Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. Crop Sci 28:63-67
34. Smith JSC, Chin ECL, Shu H, Smith OS, Wall SJ, Senior ML, Mitchell SE, Kresovitch S, Ziegle J (1997) An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet 95:163-173
35. Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Crossa J, Beck DL (1992a) Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT's subtropical and temperate early maturity maize germplasm. Crop Sci 32:884-890
36. Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Beck DL, Crossa J, Pandey S, Leon C de (1992b) Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT's tropical late white maize germplasm. Maydica 37:217-223
37. Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Gonzalez F, Han GC, Pandey S, Beck DL, Crossa J (1992c) Heterosis and combining ability of CIM-MYT's tropical x subtropical maize germplasm. Crop Sci 32:1483-1489
38. Vasal SK, Cordova HS, Pandey S, Srinivasan G (1999) Tropical maize and heterosis. Chapter 34. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. CSSA, Madison, Wisconsin
39. Warburton ML, Xia XC, Crossa J, Franco J, Melchinger AE, Frisch M, Bohn M, Hoisington D (2002) Genetic characterisation of CIMMYT maize inbred lines and open-pollinated populations using large scale fingerprinting methods. Crop Sci (in press)
40. Wellhausen EJ (1978) Recent developments in maize breeding in the tropics. In: Walden DB (ed) Maize breeding and genetics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 59-91
41. Wright S (1978) Evolution and genetics of populations, vol. IV. The University of Chicago Press