Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines: II. Morphological distances and heterosis in comparison with simple sequence repeat and amplified fragment length polymorphism data in maize

Crop Science

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 1132-1140

  Heckenberger, M ^a   Bohn, M ^b   Klein, D ^a   Melchinger, A E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 18744370503     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0111     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ajmone Marsan, P., P. Castiglioni, F. Fusari, M. Kuiper, and M. Motto. 1998. Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:219-227.
2. Anderson, J.A., G.A. Churchill, J.E. Autrique, S.D. Tanksley, and M.E. Sorrells. 1993. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36:181-186.
3. Bar-Hen, A., A. Charcosset, M. Bougoin, and J. Guiard. 1995. Relationship between genetic markers and morphological traits in a maize inbred lines collection. Euphytica 84:145-154.
4. Boppenmaier, J., A.E. Melchinger, G. Seitz, H.H. Geiger, and R.G. Herrmann. 1993. Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreds. III. Performance of crosses within versus between heterotic groups for grain traits. Plant Breed. 111:217-226.
5. Borgo, L., B. Serani, and S. Conti. 2002. Molecular profiling of genetically modified maize lines as related to the issue of essential derivation. Poster presented at the Annual Congr. of the Italian Society of Agricultural Genetics, Giardini Naxos, Italy. 18-21 Sept. 2002. Italian Society of Agricultural Genetics, Portici.
6. Burstin, J., and A. Charcosset. 1997. Relationship between phenotypic and marker distances: Theoretical and experimental investigations. Heredity 79:477-483.
7. Dhillon, B.S., C. Paul, E. Zimmer, P.A. Gurrath, D. Klein, and W.G. Pollmer. 1990. Variation and covariation in stover digestibility traits in diallel crosses of maize. Crop Sci. 30:931-936.
8. Dillmann, C., A. Bar-Hen, D. Guerin, A. Charcosset, and A. Murigneux. 1997. Comparison of RFLP and morphological distances between maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines - Consequences for germplasm protection purposes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:92-102.
9. Dillmann, D., and D. Guérin. 1998. Comparison between maize inbred lines: Genetic distances in the expert's eye. Agronomie 18:659-667.
10. Frisch, M., M. Bohn, and A.E. Melchinger. 2000. Plabsim: Software for simulation of marker-assisted backcrossing. J. Hered. 91:86-87.
11. Gill, P., C.P. Kimpton, A. Urquhart, N. Oldroyd, E.S. Millican, S.K. Watson, and T.J. Downes. 1995. Automated short tandem repeat (STR) analysis in forensic casework: A strategy for the future. Electrophoresis 16:1543-1552.
12. Gilliland, T.J., R. Coll, E. Calsyn, M. de Loose, M.J.T. Van Eijk, and I. Roldan-Ruiz. 2000. Estimating genetic conformity between related ryegrass (Lolium) varieties. 1. Morphology and biochemical characterisation. Mol. Breed. 6:569-580.
13. Heckenberger, M., M. Bohn, and A.E. Melchinger. 2005. Identification of essentially derived varieties obtained from biparental crosses of homozygous lines. I. Simple sequence repeat data from maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 45:1120-1131, this issue.
14. Heckenberger, M., M. Bohn, J.S. Ziegle, L.K. Joe, J.D. Hauser, M. Hutton, and A.E. Melchinger. 2002. Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties. 1. Genetic and technical sources of variation in SSR data. Mol. Breed. 10:181-191.
15. Heckenberger, M., J. Rouppe van der Voort, A.E. Melchinger, J. Peleman, and M. Bohn. 2003. Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties. II. Genetic and technical sources of variation in AFLP data and comparison to SSR data. Mol. Breed. 12:97-106.
16. Ihaka, R., and R. Gentleman. 1996. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graphical Stat. 5:299-314.
17. International Association of Plant Breeders for the Protection of Plant Varieties. 1999. Essential derivation and dependence - Practical infor-mation [Online]. Available at http://www.worldseed.org/Position_ papers/derive.htm [verified 30 Nov. 2004]. ASSINSEL, Nyon, Switzerland.
18. Johnson, N.L., S. Kotz, and N. Balakrishnan. (ed.) 1995. Continuous univariate distributions. Vol. 2. J. Wiley & Sons, New York.
19. Lehmann, E.L. (ed.) 1986. Testing statistical hypotheses. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
20. Levene, H. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. p. 278-292. In Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA.
21. Mahalanobis, P.C. 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India 2:49-45.
22. Malécot, G. 1948. Les mathématiques de l'heredité. Masson & Cies, Paris.
23. Melchinger, A.E. 1999. Genetic diversity and heterosis. Int. Symp. on Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crop Plants. p. 99-118. In J.G. Coors and S. Pandey (ed.) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
24. Melchinger, A.E., H.H. Geiger, and F.W. Schnell. 1986. Epistasis in maize (Zea mays L.). 2. Genetic effects in crosses among early flint and dent inbred lines determined by three methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72:231-239.
25. Nuel, G., S. Robin, and C.P. Baril. 2001. Predicting distance using a linear model: The case of varietal distinctness. J. Appl. Stat. 28: 607-621.
26. Peleman, J., R. van Wijk, J. van Oeveren, and R. van Schaik. 2000. Linkage map integration: An integrated genetic map of Zea mays L. Poster P472. Plant & Animal Genome Conf. VIII, San Diego, CA. 9-12 Jan. 2000.
27. Rebourg, C., B. Gouesnard, and A. Charcosset. 2001. Large scale molecular analysis of traditional European maize populations. Relationships with morphological variation. Heredity 86:574-587.
28. Rogers, J.S. 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. p. 145-153. In Studies in Genetics VII. Publ. 7213. Univ. of Texas, Austin.
29. Roldan-Ruiz, I., E. Calsyn, T.J. Gilliland, R. Coll, M.J.T. van Eijk, and M. de Loose. 2000a. Estimating genetic conformity between related ryegrass (Lolium) varieties. 2. AFLP characterization. Mol. Breed. 6:593-602.
30. Roldan-Ruiz, I., F.A. van Eeuwijk, T.J. Gilliland, P. Dubreuil, C. Dillmann, J. Lallemand, M. de Loose, and C.P. Baril. 2000b. A comparative study of molecular and morphological methods of describing relationships between perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:1138-1150.
31. Scheffé, H. 1959. The analysis of variance. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
32. Smith, J.S.C., and O.S. Smith. 1989a. The description and assessment of distance between inbred lines of maize: I. The use of morphological traits as descriptors. Maydica 34:141-150.
33. Smith, J.S.C., and O.S. Smith. 1989b. The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize: II. The utility of morphological, biochemical, and genetic descriptors and a scheme for testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines. Maydica 34:151-161.
34. Smith, J.S.C., O.S. Smith, S.L. Bowen, R.A. Tenborg, and S.J. Wall. 1991. The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize. III. A revised scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines utilizing DNA RFLPs. Maydica 36: 213-226.
35. 1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:833-840.
36. Snedecor, G., and W. Cochran. 1980. Statistical methods. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
37. Troyer, A.F., and T.R. Rocheford. 2002. Germplasm ownership: Related corn inbreds. Crop Sci. 42:3-11.
38. UPOV. 1978. International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants http://www.upov.int/en/publications/conventions/1978/content.htm [verified 30 Nov. 2004]. International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva.
39. UPOV. 1991. International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants [Online]. Available at http://www.upov.int/en/publications/ conventions/1991/content.htm [verified 30 Nov. 2004]. International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva.
40. Utz, H.F. 2001. Plabstat, ein Computerprogramm zur statistischen Analyse von pflanzenzüchterischen Experimenten (in German). Version 2P vom 14. Univ. Hohenheim, Germany.
41. van Eeuwijk, F.A., and C.P. Baril. 2001. Conceptual and statistical issues related to the use of molecular markers for distinctness and essential derivation. Acta Hortic. 546:35-53.