The tell-tale hand: The relationship of 2D:4D to perceived attractiveness, sex typicality, and other attributes of palms

Journal of Individual Differences

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 88-97

  Voracek, Martin ^a   Pavlovic, Stefanie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Attractiveness; Digit ratio (2D:4D); Dominance; Finger length; Hand characteristics; Individual differences; Prenatal testosterone; Sex differences; Sex hormones; Sex typicality

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547937996     PISSN: 16140001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001.28.2.88     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Austin E.J., Manning J.T., McInroy K., Matthews E. A preliminary investigation of the associations between personality, cognitive ability, and digit ratio. Personality and Individual Differences 2002, 33:1115-1124.
2. Baker F. Anthropological notes on the human hand. American Anthropologist 1888, 1:51-76.
3. Beech J.R., Mackintosh I.C. Do differences in sex hormones affect handwriting style? Evidence from digit ratio and sex role identity as determinants of the sex of handwriting. Personality and Individual Differences 2005, 39:459-468.
4. Benderlioglu Z., Nelson R.J. Digit length ratios predict reactive aggression in women, but not in men. Hormones and Behavior 2004, 46:558-564.
5. Brown W.M., Hines M., Fane B.A., Breedlove S.M. Masculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior 2002, 42:380-386.
6. Buck J.J., Williams R.M., Hughes I.A., Acerini C.L. In utero androgen exposure and 2nd to 4th digit length ratio: Comparisons between healthy controls and females with classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Human Reproduction 2003, 18:976-979.
7. Cattrall F.R., Vollenhoven B.J., Weston G.C. Anatomical evidence for in utero androgen exposure in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and Sterility 2005, 84:1689-1692.
8. Clark A.P. Self-perceived attractiveness and masculinization predict women's sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25:113-124.
9. Cohen-Bendahan C.C.C., van de Beek C., Berenbaum S.A. Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2005, 29:353-384.
10. Ecker A. Einige Bemerkungen über einen schwankenden Charakter in der Hand des Menschen. [Some remarks on a varying property of the human hand]. Archiv für Anthropologie [Braunschweig] 1875, 8:67-74.
11. Everitt B.S. The Cambridge dictionary of statistics 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Fink B., Grammer K., Mitteroecker P., Gunz P., Schaefer K., Bookstein F.L. Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2005, 272:1995-2001.
13. Fink B., Manning J.T., Neave N., Grammer K. Second to fourth digit ratio and facial asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25:125-132.
14. Fink B., Manning J.T., Williams J.H.G., Podmore-Nappin C. The 2nd to 4th digit ratio and developmental psychopathology in school-aged children. Personality and Individual Differences 2007, 42:369-379.
15. Fink B., Seydel H., Manning J.T., Kappeler P.M. A preliminary investigation of the associations between digit ratio and women's perception of men's dance. Personality and Individual Differences 2007, 42:390-391.
16. Garn S.M., Burdi A.R., Babler W.J., Stinson S. Early prenatal attainment of adult metacarpal-phalangeal rankings and proportions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1975, 43:327-332.
17. Kállai J., Csathó A., Kövér F., Makány T., Nemes J., Horváth K. MRI-assessed volume of left and right hippocampi in females correlates with the relative length of the second and fourth fingers (the 2D:4D ratio). Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 2005, 140:199-210.
18. Koehler N., Simmons L.W., Rhodes G. How well does second-to-fourth digit ratio in hands correlate with other indications of masculinity in men?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2004, 271:S296-S298.
19. Lutchmaya S., Baron-Cohen S., Raggatt P., Knickmeyer R., Manning J.T. 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone, and estradiol. Early Human Development 2004, 77:23-28.
20. Malas M.A., Dogan S., Hilal Evcil E., Desdicioglu K. Fetal development of the hand, digits, and digit ratio (2D:4D). Early Human Development 2006, 82:469-475.
21. Manning J.T. Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health 2002, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
22. Manning J.T., Barley L., Walton J., Lewis-Jones D.I., Trivers R.L., Singh D. The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success: Evidence for sexually antagonistic genes?. Evolution and Human Behavior 2000, 21:163-183.
23. Manning J.T., Bundred P.E., Mather F.M. Second to fourth digit ratio, sexual selection, and skin color. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25:38-50.
24. Manning J.T., Bundred P.E., Newton D.J., Flanagan B.F. The second to fourth digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene. Evolution and Human Behavior 2003, 24:399-405.
25. Manning J.T., Scutt D., Wilson J., Lewis-Jones D.I. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and estrogen. Human Reproduction 1998, 13:3000-3004.
26. Manning J.T., Trivers R.L., Singh D., Thornhill R. The mystery of female beauty. [letter]. Nature 1999, 399:214-215.
27. Martin J.T., Nguyen D.H. Anthropometric analysis of homosexuals and heterosexuals: Implications for early hormone exposure. Hormones and Behavior 2004, 45:31-39.
28. McGraw K.O., Wong S.P. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1996, 1:30-46.
29. McIntyre M.H., Ellison P.T., Lieberman D.E., Demerath E., Towne B. The development of sex differences in digital formula from infancy in the Fels Longitudinal Study. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2005, 272:1473-1479.
30. Nakagawa S. A farewell to Bonferroni: The problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioral Ecology 2004, 15:1044-1045.
31. Neave N., Laing S., Fink B., Manning J.T. Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone, and perceived male dominance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2003, 270:2167-2172.
32. Ökten A., Kalyoncu M., Yaris N. The ratio of second- and fourth-digit lengths and congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Early Human Development 2002, 70:47-54.
33. Perneger T.V. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal 1998, 316:1236-1238.
34. Peters M., Mackenzie K., Bryden P. Finger length and distal finger extent patterns in humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2002, 117:209-217.
35. Peters M., Tan Ü., Kang Y., Teixeira L., Mandal M. Sex-specific finger-length patterns linked to behavioral variables: Consistency across various human populations. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2002, 94:171-181.
36. Putz D.A., Gaulin S.J.C., Sporter R.J., McBurney D.H. Sex hormones and finger length: What does 2D:4D indicate?. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25:182-199.
37. Roney J.R., Maestripieri D. Relative digit lengths predict men's behavior and attractiveness during social interactions with women. Human Nature 2004, 15:271-282.
38. Rothman K.J. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1990, 1:43-46.
39. Russell D.C. Raise your hand if you think I am attractive: Second and fourth digit ratio as a predictor of self- and other-ratings of attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences 2006, 40:997-1005.
40. Saino N., Leoni B., Romano M. Human digit ratios depend on birth order and sex of older siblings and predict maternal fecundity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2006, 60:34-45.
41. Saino N., Romano M., Innocenti P. Length of index and ring fingers differentially influence sexual attractiveness of men's and women's hands. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2006, 60:447-454.
42. Scarbrough P.S., Johnston V.S. Individual differences in women's facial preferences as a function of digit ratio and mental rotation ability. Evolution and Human Behavior 2005, 26:509-526.
43. Schmitt D.P., Buss D.M. Sexual dimensions of person description: Beyond or subsumed by the Big Five?. Journal of Research in Personality 2000, 34:141-177.
44. Sorell W. The story of the human hand 1968, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.
45. Tanner J.M. Foetus into man: Physical growth from conception to maturity 1990, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. rev. ed.
46. Trivers R., Manning J.T., Jacobson A. A longitudinal study of digit ratio (2D:4D) and other finger ratios in Jamaican children. Hormones and Behavior 2006, 49:150-156.
47. van Anders S.M., Vernon P.A., Wilbur C.J. Finger-length ratios show evidence of prenatal hormone-transfer between opposite-sex twins. Hormones and Behavior 2006, 49:315-319.
48. Voracek M. Sex and side differences in relative thumb length. [letter]. Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) 2006, 31:326-327.
49. Voracek M., Dressler S.G. Lack of correlation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and Baron-Cohen's " Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test, empathy, systemizing, and autism-spectrum quotients in a general population sample. Personality and Individual Differences 2006, 41:1481-1491.
50. Voracek M., Dressler S.G. Digit ratio (2D:4D) in twins: Heritability estimates and evidence for a masculinized trait expression in women from opposite-sex pairs. Psychological Reports 2007, 100:100-126.
51. Voracek, M., Dressler, S.G., & Manning, J.T. (in press). Evidence for assortative mating on digit ratio (2D:4D), a biomarker for prenatal androgen exposure. Journal of Biosocial Science.
52. Voracek M., Manning J.T. Length of fingers and penis are related through fetal Hox gene expression. [letter]. Urology 2003, 62:201.
53. Voracek M., Manning J.T., Dressler S.G. Repeatability and interobserver error of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurements made by experts. American Journal of Human Biology 2007, 19:142-146.
54. Wade T.J., Shanley A., Imm M. Second to fourth digit ratios and individual differences in women's self-perceived attractiveness, self-esteem, and body-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences 2004, 37:799-804.