A constrained polynomial regression procedure for estimating the local False Discovery Rate

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 8, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Dalmasso, Cyril ^a   Bar Hen, Avner ^b   Broët, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b AGROPARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS; BIOLOGICAL VARIABLES; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; GENE ASSOCIATIONS; LOCAL FALSE DISCOVERY RATES; MULTIPLE TESTING PROBLEMS; POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION; SIMULATION STUDIES;

GENES; STATISTICAL TESTS;

ESTIMATION;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOMICS; HYPOTHESIS; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA MICROARRAY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BRCA1 PROTEIN; BRCA1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; BRCA2 PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN, HUMAN; TUMOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALGORITHMS; BRCA1 PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, NEOPLASTIC; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 34547841505     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-229     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hochberg Y Tamhane A Multiple Comparison Procedures Wiley 1987
2. Benjamini Y Hochberg Y Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing J R Stat Soc Ser B 1995 57 289-300
3. Storey JD A direct approach to false discovery rates J R Stat Soc Ser B 2001 64 479-498 10.1111/1467-9868.00346
4. Glonek G Salomon P Comment on 'Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis' by Ge Y, Dudoit S, Speed T TEST 2003 12 1-44 10.1007/BF02595811
5. Efron B Tibshirani R Storey J Tusher V Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment J Am Stat Assoc 2001 96 1151-1160 10.1198/ 016214501753382129
6. Efron B Local false discovery rates Technical Report 2005 http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~brad/papers/False.pdf
7. Liao JG Lin Y Selvanayagam ZE Shih WJ A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis Bioinformatics 2004 20 2694-701 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth310 15145810
8. Pan W Lin J Le C A mixture model approach to detecting differentially expressed genes with microarray data Funct Integr Genomics 2003 3 117-24 10.1007/s10142-003-0085-7 12844246
9. Newton MA Noueiry A Sarkar D Ahlquist P Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method Biostatistics 2004 5 155-76 10.1093/biostatistics/5.2.155 15054023
10. Broët P Lewin A Richardson S Dalmasso C Magdelenat H A mixture model-based strategy for selecting sets of genes in multiclass response microarray experiments Bioinformatics 2004 20 2562-2571 10.1093/ bioinformatics/bth285 15117756
11. Langaas M Lindqvist B Ferkingstad E Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, with application to DNA microarray data J R Stat Soc Ser B 2005 67 555-572 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00515.x
12. Efron B Large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing: The choice of a null hypothesis J Am Stat Assoc 2004 99 96-104 10.1198/016214504000000089
13. Aubert J Bar-Hen A Daudin JJ Robin S Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using localFDR BMC Bioinformatics 2004 5 125 520755 15350197 10.1186/1471-2105-5-125
14. Scheid S Spang R A stochastic downhill search algorithm for estimating the local false discovery rate IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 2004 1 98-108 10.1109/TCBB.2004.24
15. Broberg P A comparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6 199 1199583 16086831 10.1186/1471-2105-6-199
16. Storey JD Tibshirani R Statistical significance for genome-wide studies Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003 100 9440-9445 170937 12883005 10.1073/ pnas.1530509100
17. Hochberg Y Benjamini Y More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing Stat Med 1990 9 811-818 10.1002/sim.4780090710 2218183
18. Storey JD Tibshirani R Estimating false discovery rates under dependence, with applications to DNA microarrays Technical Report 2001-28 Department of Statistics, Stanford University 2001
19. Qiu X Klebanov L Yakovlev A Correlation between gene expression levels and limitations of the empirical Bayes methodology for finding differentially expressed genes Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2005 4 Article34 16646853
20. Johnson NL Kotz S Balakrishnan N Continuous Univariate Distributions, chapters 28 and 31 Wiley, New York 1995 2
21. Hedenfalk I Duggan D Chen Y Radmacher M Bittner M Simon R Meltzer P Gusterson B Esteller M Kallioniemi OP Wilfond B Borg A Trent J Raffeld M Yakhini Z Ben-Dor A Dougherty E Kononen J Bubendorf L Fehrle W Pittaluga S Gruvberger S Loman N Johannsson O Olsson H Sauter G Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer N Engl J Med 2001 344 539-548 10.1056/NEJM200102223440801 11207349
22. Wang Y Klijn JG Zhang Y Sieuwerts AM Look MP Yang F Talantov D Timmermans M Meijer-van Gelder ME Yu J Jatkoe T Berns EM Atkins D Foekens JA Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer Lancet 2005 365 671-679 15721472
23. Gene Expression Omnibus http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo
24. Bolstad BM Irizarry RA Astrand M Speed TP A Comparison of Normalization Methods for High Density Oligonucleotide Array Data Based on Bias and Variance Bioinformatics 2003 19 185-193 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185 12538238
25. Pan W On the use of permutation in and the performanceof a class of nonparametric methods to detect differential gene expression Bioinformatics 2003 19 1333-1340 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg167 12874044
26. Guo X Pan W Using weighted permutation scores to detect differential gene expression with microarray data J Bioinform Comput Biol 2005 3 4 989-1006 10.1142/S021972000500134X 16078371
27. Xie Y Pan W Khodursky AB A note on using permutation based false discovery rate estimate to compare different analysis methods for microarray data Bioinformatics 2005 21 4280-4288 10.1093/bioinformatics/ bti685 16188930
28. Ploner A Calza S Gusnanto A Pawitan Y Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies Bioinformatics 2006 22 556-565 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk013 16368770
29. Gill PE Murray W Wright MH Practical Optimization London: Academic Press 1981
30. polfdr http://ifr69.vjf.inserm.fr/polfdr