Identification of conserved protein complexes based on a model of protein network evolution

Bioinformatics

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Hirsh, Eitan ^a   Sharan, Roded ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC CONSERVATION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 33846680167     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl295     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bandyopadhyay,S. et al. (2006) Systematic identification of functional orthologs based on protein network comparison. Genome Res., 16, 428-435.
2. Berg,J. et al. (2004) Structure and evolution of protein interaction networks: A statistical model for link dynamics and gene duplications. BMC Evol. Biol., 4, 51.
3. Deng,M. et al. (2003) Assessment of the reliability of protein-protein interactions and protein function prediction. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 140-151.
4. Gavin,A.C. et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415, 141-147.
5. Grossmann,S. et al. (2006) An improved statistic for detecting over-represented gene orthology annotations in gene sets. Proc. RECOMB.
6. Ho,Y. et al. (2002) Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature, 415, 180-183.
7. Ito,T. et al. (2001a) Exploring the protein interactome using comprehensive two-hybrid projects. Trends Biotechnol., 19 (Suppl. 10), 23-27.
8. Ito,T. et al. (2001b) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 4569-4574.
9. Kelley,B.P. et al. (2003) Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 11394-11399.
10. Koyuturk,M. et al. (2005) Pairwise alignment of protein interaction networks. J. Comput. Biol., 13, 182-199.
11. Mann,M. et al. (2001) Analysis of proteins and proteomes by mass spectrometry. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 70, 437-473.
12. Matthews,L.R. et al. (2001) Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or 'interologs'. Genome Res., 11, 2120-2126.
13. Remm,M. et al. (2001) Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pair-wise species comparisons. Mol. Biol., 314, 1041-1052.
14. Raul,J.F. et al. (2005) Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature, 437, 1173-1178.
15. Sharan,R. et al. (2004) Identification of protein complexes by comparative analysis of yeast and bacterial protein interaction data. J. Comput. Biol., 12, 835-846.
16. Sharan,R. et al. (2005) Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA., 102, 1974-1979.
17. Stelzl,U. et al. (2005) A human protein-protein interaction network: A resource for annotating the proteome. Cell, 122, 957-968.
18. The Gene Ontology Consortium (2000), Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet., 25, 25-29.
19. Uetz,P. et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 403, 623-627.
20. Wagner,A. (2001) The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Mol. Biol. Evol., 18, 1283-1292.