Markov methods for hierarchical coarse-graining of large protein dynamics

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 765-776

  Chennubhotla, Chakra ^a   Bahar, Ivet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Information propagation; Markov process; Network model

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN;

ANISOTROPY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; BINDING SITES; GROEL PROTEIN; GROES PROTEIN; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 34547683322     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2007.R015     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Atilgan, A.R., Durell, S.R., Jernigan, R.L., et al. 2001. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys. J. 80, 505.
2. Bahar, I., Atilgan, A.R., and Erman, B. 1997. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in protein using a single parameter harmonic potential. Folding Design 2, 173-181.
3. Bahar, I., and Jernigan, R.L. 1997. Inter-residue potentials in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophilic interactions at close separation. J. Mol. Biol. 266, 195.
4. Bahar, I., and Rader, A.J. 2005. Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 586-592.
5. Barnard, S., and Simon H. 1994. A fast multi-level implementation of recursive spectral bisection for partitioning unstructured grid. Concurrency Pract. Exper. 6, 101-117.
6. Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., et al. 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235-242.
7. Braig, K., Otwinowski, Z., Hegde, R., et al. 1994. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371, 578-586.
8. Chennubhotla, C., and Jepson, A. 2005. Hierarchical eigensolver for transition matrices in spectral methods. NIPS 17, 273-280.
9. Chennubhotla, C., and Bahar, I. 2006. Markov propagation of allosteric effects in biomolecular systems. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2:36.
10. Chung, F.R.K. 1997. Spectral Graph Theory. CBMS Lectures, AMS.
11. Doruker, P., Atilgan, A.R., and Bahar, I. 2000. Dynamics of proteins predicted by molecular dynamics simulations and analytical approaches: application to α-amylase inhibitor. Proteins 40, 512-524.
12. Doruker, P., Jernigan, R.L., and Bahar, I. 2002. Dynamics of large proteins through hierarchical levels of coarse-grained structures, J. Comput. Chem. 23, 119.
13. Fowlkes, C., Belongie, S., Chung, F., et al. 2004. Spectral grouping using the Nyström method. IEEE PAMI 26, 2.
14. Haliloglu, T., Bahar, I., and Erman, B. 1997. Gaussian dynamics of folded proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3090-3093.
15. Hinsen, K. 1998. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations. Proteins 33, 417.
16. Hohfeld, J., and Hartl, F.U. 1994. Role of the chaperonin cofactor hsp10 in protein folding and sorting in yeast mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 126, 305-315.
17. Keskin, O., Bahar, I., Flatow, D., et al. 2002. Molecular mechanisms of chaperonin groel-groes function. Biochemistry 41, 491-501.
18. Koren, Y., Carmel, L., and Harel, D. 2003. Drawing huge graphs by algebraic multigrid optimization, multiscale modeling and simulation. SIAM 1, 645-673.
19. Kullback, S. 1959. Information Theory and Statistics. Dover Publications, New York.
20. Kullback, S., and Leibler, R.A. 1951. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22, 79-86.
21. Kundu, S., Melton, J.S., Sorensen, D.C., et al. 2002. Dynamics of proteins in crystals: comparison of experiment with imple models. Biophys. J. 83, 723-732.
22. Kovalenko, O., Yifrach, O., and Horovitz, A. 1994. Residue lysine-34 in groes modulates allosteric transitions in groel. Biochemistry 33, 14974-14978.
23. Kurkcuoglu, O., Jernigan, R.L., and Doruker, P. 2004. Mixed levels of coarse-graining of large proteins using elastic network model methods in extracting the slowest motions. Polymers 45, 649-657.
24. Landry, S.J., Zeilstra-Ryalls, J., Fayet, O., et al. 1993. Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of groes. Nature 364, 255-258.
25. Lehoucq, R.B., Sorensen, D.C., and Yang, C. 1996. ARPACK user guide: solution of large scale eigenvalue problems by omplicitly restarted Arnoldi methods [Technical Report]. Department of CAM, Rice University.
26. 2+-ATPase. Biophys. J. 83, 2457.
27. Ma, J., Sigler, P.B., Xu, Z.H., et al. 2000. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of groel. J. Mol. Biol. 302, 303-313.
28. Ma, J. 2005. Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular systems. Structure 13, 373-380.
29. Marques O. 1995. BLZPACK: description and user's guide [Technical Report PA/95/30]. CERFACS, Toulouse, France.
30. McLachlan, G.J., and Basford, K.E. 1988. Mixture Models: Inference and Applications to Clustering. Marcel Dekker, New York.
31. Miyazawa, S., and Jernigan, R.L. 1985. Estimation of effective inter-residue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18, 534.
32. Rader, A.J., Chennubhotla, C., Yang, L.-W., et al. 2005. The Gaussian network model: theory and applications. In: Cui, Q. and Bahar, I., eds. Normal Mode Analysis: Theory and Applications to Biological and Chemical Systems. Chapman & Hall/CRC Mathematical and Computational Biology Series, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, 41-64.
33. Richardson, A., and Georgopoulos, C. 1999. Genetic analysis of the bacteriophage t4-encoded cochaperonin gp31. Genetics 152, 1449-1457.
34. Richardson, A., van der Vies, S.M., Keppel, F., et al. 1999. Compensatory changes in groel/gp31 affinity as a mechanism for allele-specific genetic interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 52-58.
35. Richardson, A., Schwager, F., Landry, S.J., et al. 2001. The importance of a mobile loop in regulating chaperonin/ co-chaperonin interaction: humans versus escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 4981-4987.
36. Shewmaker, F., Maskos, K., Simmerling, C., et al. 2001. The disordered mobile loop of groes folds into a defined beta-hairpin upon binding groel. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 31257-31264.
37. Saibil, H.R., and Ranson, N.R. 2002. The chaperonin folding machine. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 627-632.
38. Simon, H., and Zha, H. 2000. Low-rank matrix approximation using the Lanczos bidiagonalization process with applications. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21, 2257-2274.
39. Tama, F., and Sanejouand, Y.H. 2001. Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. Protein Eng. 14, 1-6.
40. Tama, F., Gadea, F.X., Marques, O., et al. 2000. Building-block approach for determining low-frequency normal modes of macromolecules. Proteins 41, 1-7.
41. Watkins, D.S. 2002. Fundamentals of Matrix Computations. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
42. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388, 741-750.
43. Yifrach, O., and Horovitz, A. 1995. Nested cooperativity in the atpase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin groel. Biochemistry 34, 5303-5308.