Comparing stage of change and behavioral intention to understand fruit intake

Health Education Research

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 599-608

  De Vet, Emely ^a,b,c   De Nooijer, Jascha ^b   De Vries, Nanne K ^b   Brug, Johannes ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD INTAKE; FRUIT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADULT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRUIT; HUMANS; INTENTION; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 34547674785     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyl121     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 51: 390-5.
2. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50: 179-211.
3. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
4. Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ. Commentary: revitalizing research on health behavior theories. Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 294-7.
5. Weinstein ND. Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychol 1993; 12: 324-33.
6. Nigg CR, Allegrante JP, Ory M. Theory-comparison and multiple-behavior research: common themes advancing health behavior research. Health Educ Res 2002; 17: 670-9.
7. Noar SM, Zimmerman RS. Health behavior theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction? Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 275-90.
8. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol 1992; 47: 1102-14.
9. Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ, Sutton SR. Stage theories of health behavior: conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychol 1998; 17: 290-9.
10. Van Sluijs EMF, Van Poppel MNM, Van Mechelen W. Stage-based lifestyle interventions in primary care: are they effective? Am J Prev Med 2004; 26: 330-43.
11. Riemsma RP, Pattenden J, Bridle C et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness of stage based interventions to promote smoking cessation. Br Med J 2003; 326: 1175-81.
12. Adams J, White M. Are activity promotion interventions based on the transtheoretical model effective? A critical review. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 106-14.
13. De Vet E, Brug J, De Nooijer J et al. Determinants of forward stage transitions: a Delphi study. Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 195-205.
14. Sutton S. Stage theories of health behaviour. In: Conner M, Norman P (eds). Predicting Health Behaviour: Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models, 2nd edn. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2005, 223-75.
15. West R. Time for a change: putting the transtheoretical (stages of change) model to rest. Addiction 2005; 100: 1036-9.
16. Brug J, Conner M, Harre N et al. The transtheoretical model and stages of change: a critique. Observations by five commentators on the paper by Adams, J. and White M. (2004) why don't stage-based activity promotion interventions work. Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 244-58.
17. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Social cognition models and health behaviour: a structured review. Psychol Health 2000; 15: 173-89.
18. Kraft P, Sutton SR, Reynolds HM. The transtheoretical model of behaviour change: are the stages qualitatively different? Psychol Health 1999; 14: 433-50.
19. Brug J, Van Assema P. Differences in use and impact of computer-tailored dietary feedback according to stage of change and education. Appetite 2000; 34: 285-93.
20. Campbell MK, Reynolds KD, Havas S et al. Stages of change for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among adults and young adults participating in the national 5-a-Day for Better Health community studies. Health Educ Behav1999; 26: 513-34.
21. De Vries H, Backbier E. Self-efficacy as an important determinant of quitting among pregnant women who smoke: the Ø-pattern. Prev Med 1994; 23: 167-74.
22. Courneya KS, Plotnikoff RC, Hotz SB et al. Predicting exercise stage transitions over two consecutive 6-month periods: a test of the theory of planned behaviour in a population-based sample. Br J Health Psychol 2001; 6: 135-50.
23. Srinath Reddy K, Katan MB. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Public Health Nutr 2004; 7: 167-86.
24. Rolls BJ, Ello-Martin JA, Carlton Tohill B. What can intervention studies tell us about the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and weight management. Nutr Rev 2004; 62: 1-17.
25. Key TJ, Schatzkin A, Willet WC et al. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer. Public Health Nutr 2004; 7: 187-200.
26. Van der Wilk EA, Jansen J. Lifestyle-related risks: are trends in Europe converging? Public Health 2005; 119: 55-66.
27. Serdula MK, Gillespei C, Kettel-Khan L et al. Trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in the United States: behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1994-2000. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 1014-8.
28. RIVM. Gezondheid op koers? Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning 2002. [Health on Course? An Exploration of the Future of Public Health 2002.] Bilthoven: RIVM, 2002.
29. Povey R, Conner M, Sparks P et al. Application of the theory of planned behaviour to two dietary behaviours: roles of perceived control and self-efficacy. Br J Health Psychol 2000; 5: 121-39.
30. Ma J, Betts NM, Horacek T et al. Assessing stages of change for fruit and vegetable intake in young adults: a combination of traditional staging algorithms and food-frequency questionnaires. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 224-36.
31. Bogers RP, Van Assema P, Kester ADM et al. Reproducibility, validity and responsiveness to change of a short questionnaire for measuring intake of fruits and vegetables. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159: 900-9.
32. Van Assema P, Brug J, Ronda G et al. A short Dutch questionnaire to measure fruit and vegetable intake: relative validity among adults and adolescents. Nutr Health 2002; 16: 85-106.
33. Nigg CR, Burbank PM, Padula C et al. Stages of change across ten health risk behaviors for older adults. Gerontologist 1999; 39: 473-82.
34. Laforge RG, Velicer WF, Richmond RL et al. Stage distributions for five health behaviors in the United States and Australia. Prev Med 1999; 28: 61-74.
35. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 2002.
36. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lwarence Erlbaum, 1988.
37. Fleiss JL. The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Fleiss JL (ed). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981, 212-36.
38. Bowerman BL, O'Connell RT. Linear Statistical Models: An Applied Approach, 2nd edn. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press, 1990.
39. Burke V, Richards J, Milligan RAK et al. Stages of change for health-related behaviours in 18 year-old Australians. Psychol Health 2000; 14: 1061-75.
40. Sutton S. Interpreting cross-sectional data on stages of change. Psychol Health 2000; 15: 163-71.
41. Armitage CJ, Arden MA. Exploring discontinuity patterns in the transtheoretical model: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Health Psychol 2002; 7: 89-103.
42. Herrick AB, Stone WJ, Mettler MM. Stages of change, decisional balance, and self-efficacy across four health behaviors in aworksite environment. Am JHealth Promot 1997; 12: 49-56.
43. Horacek TM, White A, Betts NM et al. Self-efficacy, perceived benefits, and weight satisfaction discriminate among stages of change for fruit and vegetable intakes for young men and women. J Am Diet Assoc 2002; 102: 1466-70.
44. De Vet E, De Nooijer J, De Vries NK et al. Determinants of forward stage transition from precontemplation and contemplation for fruit consumption. Am J Health Promot 2005; 19: 278-85.
45. Brug J, De Vet E, De Nooijer J et al. Predicting fruit consumption: cognitions, intentions and habits. J Nutr Educ Behav 2006; 38: 73-81.
46. Courneya KS, Nigg CR, Estabrooks PA. Relationships among the theory of planned behavior, stages of change, and exercise behavior in older persons over a three-year period. Psychol Health 1998; 13: 355-67.
47. Schumann A, Estabrooks PA, Nigg CR et al. Validation of the stages of change with mild, moderate and strenuous physical activity behavior, intentions, and self-efficacy. Int J Sports Med 2003; 5: 363-5.
48. Dijkstra A, Bakker M, de Vries H. Subtypes within a sample of precontemplating smokers: a preliminary extension of the stages of change. Health Educ Res 1997; 22: 327-37.
49. Kremers SPJ, Mudde AN, De Vries H. Subtypes within the precontemplation stage of adolescent smoking acquisition. Addict Behav 2001; 26: 237-51.
50. Velicer WF, Hughes SL, Fava JL et al. An empirical typology of subjects within stage of change. Addict Behav 1995; 20: 299-320.
51. Norman GJ, Velicer WF, Fava JL et al. Cluster subtypes within stage of change in a representative sample of smokers. Addict Behav 2000; 25: 183-204.
52. Reed G, Velicer WF, Prochaska JO et al. What makes a good staging algorithm: examples from regular exercise. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12: 57-66.
53. Nigg CR. There is more to stages of exercise than just exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2005; 33: 32-5.
54. Kristal AR, Vizenor NC, Patterson BH et al. Precision and bias of food frequency-based measures of fruit and vegetable intakes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000; 9: 939-44.
55. Ocke MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Goddijn HE et al. The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: S37-48.
56. Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: theoretical approaches and a new model. In: Schwarzer R (ed). Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action. London: Hemisphere, 1992, 217-43.
57. Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol 1988; 7: 355-86.
58. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM. A model of the precaution adoption process: evidence from home radon testing. Health Psychol 1992; 11: 170-80.
59. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Response: misinterpretations and misapplications of the Transtheoretical model. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12: 11-12.
60. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Comments, criteria, and creating better models. In response to Davidson. In: Miller WR, Heather N (eds). Treating Addictive Behaviors, 2nd edn. New York: Plenum, 1998, 39-45.
61. West R. What does it take for a theory to be abandoned? The Transtheoretical model of behavior change as a test case. Addiction 2005; 100: 1048-50.
62. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The Transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12: 38-48.
63. Brug J, Campbell M, Van Assema P. The application of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 145-56.
64. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1991.
65. Kroeze W, Werkman A, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized studies on the effects of computer-tailored health education for diet and physical activity change. Ann Behav Med 2006; 31: 205-23.
66. Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T et al. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55: 305-12.