Transient pockets on protein surfaces involved in protein-protein interaction

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 50, Issue 15, 2007, Pages 3457-3464

  Eyrisch, Susanne ^a   Helms, Volkhard ^a  

^a Center for Bioinformatics   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCKING PROTEIN; INHIBITOR PROTEIN; INTERLEUKIN 2; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BCL XL; PROTEIN MDM2;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BCL-X PROTEIN; BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DESIGN; INTERLEUKIN-2; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-MDM2;

EID: 34547583152     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm070095g     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Sharma, S. K.; Ramsey, T. M.; Bair, K. W. Protein-protein interactions: lessons learned. Curr. Med. Chem.: Anti-Cancer Agents 2002, 2, 311-330.
2. Berg, T. Modulation of protein-protein interactions with small organic molecules. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2003, 42, 2462-2481.
3. Yin, H.; Hamilton, A. D. Strategies for targeting protein-protein interactions with synthetic agents. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2005, 44, 4130-4163.
4. Ryan, K. M.; Phillips, A. C.; Vousden, K. H. Regulation and function of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001, 13, 332-337.
5. Michael, D.; Oren, M. The p53-Mdm2 module and the ubiquitin system. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2003, 13, 49-58.
6. Hollstein, M.; Sidransky, D.; Vogelstein, B.; Harris, C. C. p53 mutations in human cancers. Science 1991, 253, 49-53.
7. Zheleva, D. I.; Lane, D. P.; Fischer, P. M. The p53-Mdm2 pathway: targets for the development of new anticancer therapeutics. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 257-270.
8. Fry, D. C.; Emerson, S. D.; Palme, S.; Vu, B. T.; Liu, C. M.; Podlaski, F. J. NMR structure of a complex between MDM2 and a small molecule inhibitor. J. Biomol. NMR 2004, 30, 163-173.
9. Vassilev, L. T.; Vu, B. T.; Graves, B.; Carvajal, D.; Podlaski, F.; Filipovic, Z.; Kong, N.; Kammlott, U.; Lukacs, C.; Klein, C.; Fotouhi, N.; Liu, E. A. In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science 2004, 303, 844-848.
10. Grasberger, B. L.; Lu, T.; Schubert, C.; Parks, D. J.; Carver, T. E.; Koblish, H. K.; Cummings, M. D.; LaFrance, L. V.; Milkiewicz, K. L.; Calvo, R. R.; Maguire, D.; Lattanze, J.; Franks, C. F.; Zhao, S.; Ramachandren, K.; Bylebyl, G. R.; Zhang, M.; Manthey, C. L.; Petrella, E. C.; Pantoliano, M. W.; Deckman, I. C.; Spurlino, J. C.; Maroney, A. C.; Tomczuk, B. E.; Molloy, C. J.; Bone, R. F. Discovery and cocrystal structure of benzodiazepinedione HDM2 antagonists that activate p53 in cells. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 909-912.
11. Arkin, M. R.; Wells, J. A. Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: progressing towards the dream. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3, 301-317.
12. Apostolakis, J.; Plueckthun, A.; Caflisch, A. Docking Small ligands in flexible binding sites. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 19, 21-37.
13. Zacharias, M. Rapid protein-ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: binding of FK506 to FKBP. Proteins 2004, 54, 759-767.
14. Meiler, J.; Baker, D. ROSETTALIGAND: protein-small molecule docking with full side-chain flexibility. Proteins 2006, 65, 538-548.
15. Sousa, F. S.; Fernandes, P. A.; Ramos, M. J. Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges. Proteins 2006, 65, 15-26.
16. Brady, G. P.; Stouten, P. F. W. Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 383-401. http://www.ccl.net/cca/software/UNIX/pass/ overview.shtml.
17. Levitt, D. G.; Banaszak, L. J. POCKET: a computer graphics method for identifying and displaying protein cavities and their surrounding amino acids. J. Mol. Graphics 1992, 10, 229-234.
18. Hendlich, M.; Rippmann, F.; Barnickel, G. LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 1997, 15, 359-363.
19. Laskowski, R. A. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J. Mol. Graphics 1995, 13, 323-330.
20. Laurie, A. T. R.; Jackson, R. M. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 1908-1916.
21. Meagher, K. L.; Carlson, H. A. Incorporating protein flexibility in structure-based drug discovery: using HIV-1 protease as a test case. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13276-13281.
22. Sivanesan, D.; Rajnarayanan, R. V.; Doherty, J.; Pattabiraman, N. In-silico screening using flexible ligand binding pockets: a molecular dynamics-based approach. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2005, 19, 213-228.
23. Wong, C. F.; Kua, J.; Zhang, Y.; Straatsma, T. P.; McCammon, J. A. Molecular docking of balanol to dynamics snapshots of protein kinase A. Proteins 2005, 61, 850-858.
24. Frembgen-Kesner, T.; Elcock, A. H. Computational sampling of a cryptic drug binding site in a protein receptor: explicit solvent molecular dynamics and inhibitor docking to p38 MAP kinase. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 359, 202-214.
25. Helms, V. Protein dynamics tightly connected to the dynamics of surrounding and internal water molecules. ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 23-33.
26. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662. http://autodock.scripps.edu.
27. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242. http://www.rcsb.org.
28. de Bakker, P. I.; DePristo, M. A.; Burke, D. F.; Blundell, T. L. Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: accuracy of loop decoy discrimination by an all atom statistical potential and the AMBER force field with the generalized Born solvation model. Proteins 2003, 51, 21-40. http://mordred.bioc.cam.ac.uk/~rapper.
29. Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; van der Spoel, D. GROMACS 3.0: A package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J. Mol. Model. 2001, 7, 306-317. www.gromacs.org/.
30. Jorgensen, W. L.; Maxwell, D. S.; Tirado-Rives, J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11225-11236.
31. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R. W.; Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926-935.
32. Darden, T.; York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle mesh ewald: An n log-(n) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 10089-10092.
33. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; DiNola, A.; Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3684-3690.
34. Hess, B.; Bekker, H.; Berendsen, H. J. C.; Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1463-1472.
35. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD. Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33-38. http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/ Research/vmd/.
36. Sanner, M. F. Python: a programming language for software integration and development. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 1999, 17, 57-61. http://mgltools.scripps.edu.
37. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Iterative partial equilibration of orbital electronegativity - a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3219-3228.