The contribution of graphophonological-semantic flexibility to reading comprehension in college students: Implications for a less simple view of reading

Journal of Literacy Research

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 173-193

  Cartwright, Kelly B ^a  

^a CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547533660     PISSN: 1086296X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10862960701331902     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Allington, R. (2002). Big brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Althouse, R. (1985). The relationship between initial reading and performance on Piagetian tasks. Reading Improvement, 22, 21-28.
4. Andrews, G., & Halford, G. S. (2002). A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive develop-ment. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 153-219.
5. Arlin, P. (1981). Piagetian tasks as predictors of reading and math readiness in Grades K-I. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 712-721.
6. Beck, I. L., & Carpenter, P. A. (1986). Cognitive approaches to understanding reading: Implications for instructional practice. American Psychologist, 41, 1098-1105.
7. Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636-644.
8. Bidell, T. R., & Fischer, K. W. (1992). Beyond the stage debate: Action, structure, and variability in Piagetian theory and research. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development (pp. 100-140). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bigler, R. S. (1995). The role of classification skill in moderating environmental influences in children's gender stereotyping: A study of the functional use of gender in the classroom. Child Development, 66, 1072-1087.
10. Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in children's gender stereotyping: The-oretical and educational implications of a cognitive-based intervention. Child Development, 63, 1351-1363.
11. Briggs, C., & Elkind, D. (1973). Cognitive development in early readers. Developmental Psychology, 9, 279-280.
12. Canter, A. (1975). A developmental study of the relationships between cognitive abilities and early reading achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
13. Cartwright, K. B. (2002). Cognitive development and reading: The relation of multiple classification skill to reading comprehension in elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 56-63.
14. Cartwright, K. B. (2006). Fostering flexibility and comprehension in elementary students. The Read-ing Teacher, 59, 628-634.
15. Cartwright, K. B., Isaac, M. C., & Dandy, K. L. (2006). The development of reading-specific representational flexibility: A cross-sectional comparison of second graders, fourth graders, and college students. In A. V. Mittel (Ed.), Focus on educational psychology (pp. 173-194). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
16. Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of child development. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development (pp. 161-196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Case, R., & Okamoto, Y. (1996). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children's thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1-2, Serial No. 246).
18. Chabot, R. J., Petros, T. V., & McCord, G. (1983). Developmental and reading disability differences in accessing information from semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 128-142.
19. Chali, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
20. Clay, M. M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
21. Clay, M. M. (2001). Change over time in children's literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. Cohen, S. A., Hyman, J. S., & Battistini, E. E. (1983). Effects of teaching Piagetian decentration upon learning to read. Reading Improvement, 20, 96-104.
23. Colom, R., Flores-Mendoza, C., & Rebollo, I. (2003). Working memory and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 33-39.
24. Crain-Thoreson, C. (1996). Phonemic processes in children's listening and reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 383-401.
25. Deák, G. O. (2003). The development of cognitive flexibility and language abilities. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior: Vol. 31 (pp. 271-327). San Diego, CA: Academic.
26. Diamond, A., & Kirkham, N. (2005). Not quite as grown up as we like to think: Parallels between cognition in childhood and adulthood. Psychological Science, 16, 291-297.
27. Dowhower, S. L. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency's unattended bedfellow. Theory into Practice, 30, 158-164.
28. Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Ehri, L. C. (1993). Becoming an alphabetic reader is not easy for emergent readers. International Journal of Reading, 19, 606-617.
30. Elkind, D., Larson, M., & Van Doornick, W. (1965). Perceptual decentration learning and perfor-mance in slow and average readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 50-56.
31. Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32. Forguson, L., & Gopnik, A. (1988). The ontogeny of common sense. In J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris, & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp. 226-243). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Burack, J. A. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control I: Theory of mind in typical and atypical development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 116-121.
34. Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10, 483-527.
35. Gaskins, R. W., & Gaskins, I. W. (1997). Creating readers who read for meaning and love to read: The Benchmark School reading program. In S. A. Stahl & D. A. Hayes (Eds.), Instructional models in reading (pp. 131-159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Gattuso, B., Smith, L. B., & Treiman, R. (1991). Classifying by dimensions and reading: A com-parison of the auditory and visual modalities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 139-169.
37. Golbeck, S. L. (1983). Reconstructing a large-scale spatial arrangement: Effects of environmental organization and operativity. Developmental Psychology, 19, 644-653.
38. Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 1-13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
39. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
40. Gough, P. B., & Walsh, M. A. (1991). Chinese, Phoenicians, and the orthographic cipher of English. In S. A. Brady & D. R. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 199-210). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127-160.
42. Horowitz, F. D. (2000). Child development and the PITS: Simple questions, complex answers, and developmental theory. Child Development, 71, 1-10.
43. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child (E. A. Lunzer & D. Papert, Trans.). New York: Humanities Press.
44. Jacques, S., & Zelazo, P. D. (2005). Language and the development of cognitive flexibility: Impli-cations for theory of mind. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 144-162). New York: Oxford.
45. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1991). Innate constraints and developmental change. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 171-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
46. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1990). Kaufman brief intelligence test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
47. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
48. Labouvie-Vief, G. (1990). Modes of knowledge and the organization of development. In M. L. Commons, C. Armon, L. Kohlberg, F. A. Richards, T. A. Grotzer, & J. D. Sinnott (Eds.), Adult development: Vol. 2. Models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought (pp. 4362). New York: Praeger.
49. Labouvie-Vief, G. (1992). A neo-Piagetian perspective on adult cognitive development. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development (pp. 197-228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Lovrich, D., Cheng, J. C., & Velting, D. M. (1996). Late cognitive brain potentials, phonological and semantic classification of spoken words, and reading ability in children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 161-177.
51. Luo, C. R., Johnson, R. A., & Gallo, D. A. (1998). Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: Evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task. Memory and Cognition, 26, 833-843.
52. McCutchen, D., & Crain-Thoreson, C. (1994). Phonemic processes in children's reading compre-hension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 69-87.
53. McCutchen, D., Dibble, E., & Blount, M. M. (1994). Phonemic effects in reading comprehension and text memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 597-611.
54. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85-101.
55. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
57. Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15, 1-12.
58. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child (H. Weaver, Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1966)
59. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
60. Pressley, M. (2002). What I have learned up until now about research methods in reading education. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 51, 33-44.
61. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
62. Pressley, M., Duke, N. K., & Boling, E. C. (2004). The educational science and scientifically based instruction we need: Lessons from reading research and policymaking. Harvard Educational Review, 74, 30-61.
63. Pressley, M., Duke, N. K., Gaskins, I. W., Fingeret, L., Halladay, J., Hilden, K., et al. (in press). Working with struggling readers: Why we must get beyond the simple view of reading and visions of how it might be done. In T. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of school psychology (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
64. Royer, J. M. (1983). Reading: The natural interface between developmental and educational psy-chology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 205-209.
65. Salthouse, T. (1993). Influence of working memory on adult age differences in matrix reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 171-199.
66. Sinnott, J. D. (1998). The development of logic in adulthood: Postformal thought and its applications. New York: Plenum.
67. Stanovich, K. E. (1996). Word recognition: Changing perspectives. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. 2. (418-452). New York: Longman.
68. Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory and Cognition, 20, 51-68.
69. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Literacy experiences and the shaping of cognition. In S. G. Paris & H. M. Wellman (Eds.), Global prospects for education: Development, culture, and schooling (pp. 253-288). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
70. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402-433.
71. Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., Cunningham, A. E., Cipielewski, J., & Siddiqui, S. (1996). The role of inadequate print exposure as a determinant of reading comprehension problems. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 15-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
72. Sternberg, R. J. (2000). The rebirth of children's learning. Child Development, 71, 26-35.
73. Sternberg, R. J., & Lyon, G. R. (2002). Making a difference in education: Will psychology pass up the chance? Monitor on Psychology, 33(1), 76.
74. Underwood, B. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128-134.
75. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between operation span and Raven. Intelligence, 33, 67-81.
76. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181-198.
77. Verguts, T., & De Boeck, P. (2002). On the correlation between working memory capacity and performance on intelligence tests. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 37-55.
78. Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
79. Zelazo, P. D., & Frye, D. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control II: The development of executive function in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 121-126.