Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: Evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 833-843

  Luo, Chun R ^a   Johnson, Reed A ^a   Gallo, David A ^a  

^a WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; READING; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0031879731     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211402     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. BANKS, W. P., OKA, E., & SHUGARMAN, S. (1981). Recoding of printed words to internal speech: Does recoding come before lexical access? In O. J. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology (pp. 137-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. BARON, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 241-246.
3. BECKER, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 556-566.
4. BECKER, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8, 493-512.
5. CARR, T. H., DAVIDSON, B. J., & HAWKINS, H. L. (1978). Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: Strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 674-690.
6. CARR, T. H., & POLLATSEK, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 1-82). New York: Academic Press.
7. COLTHEART, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). New York: Academic Press.
8. COLTHEART, M. (1980). Reading, phonological receding, and deep dyslexia. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 197-226). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
9. COLTHEART, M., CURTIS, B., ATKINS, P., & HALLER, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
10. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. T., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). New York: Academic Press.
11. COLTHEART, V., LAXON, V. RICKARD, M., & ELTON, C. (1988). Phonological recoding in reading for meaning by adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 387-397.
12. COLTHEART, V., PATTERSON, K., & LEAHY, J. (1994). When a ROWS is a ROSE: Phonological effects in written word comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 917-955.
13. DAVELAAR, E., COLTHEART, M., BESNER, D., & JONASSON, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 6, 391-402.
14. DOCTOR, E. A., & COLTHEART, M. (1980). Children's use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Memory & Cognition, 8, 195-209.
15. FLEMING, K. K. (1993). Phonologically mediated priming in spoken and printed word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 272-284.
16. FRANCIS, W. N., & KUČERA, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
17. GIBSON, E. J. (1970). The ontogeny of reading. American Psychologist, 25, 136-143.
18. GLUSHKO, R. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 674-691.
19. GOUGH, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. A. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by eye and by ear (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. GREEN, D. W., & SHALLICE, T. (1976). Direct visual access in reading for meaning. Memory & Cognition, 4, 753-758.
21. HAWKINS, H. L., REICHER, G. M., ROGERS, M., & PETERSON, L. (1976). Flexible coding in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 380-385.
22. HENDERSON, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. New York: Academic Press.
23. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & EVETT, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 8, 689-740.
24. HUMPHREYS, G. W., EVETT, L. J., & TAYLOR, D. E. (1982). Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 576-590.
25. JARED, D., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358-394.
26. KAY, J., & MARCEL, A. J. (1981). One process, not two, in reading aloud: Lexical analogies do the work of nonlexical rules. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 397-414.
27. KLAPP, S. T. (1971). Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 262-267.
28. LESCH, M. F., & POLLATSEK, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 285-294.
29. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1991). Phonological access of the lexicon: Evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 951-966.
30. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
31. LUO, C. R. (1996). How is word meaning accessed in reading? Evidence from the phonologically mediated interference effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 883-895.
32. MARTIN, R. C. (1982). The pseudohomophone effect: The role of visual similarity in nonword decisions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 395-409.
33. MCCUSKER, L. X., HILLINGER, M. L., & BIAS, R. G. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 217-245.
34. MEYER, D. E., & GUTSCHERA, K. D. (1975, November). Orthographic versus phonemic processing of printed words. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Denver.
35. MEYER, D. E., SCHVANEVELDT, R. W., & RUDDY, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition. Memory & Cognition, 2, 309-321.
36. PAAP, K. R., NEWSOME, S. L., MCDONALD, J. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1982). An activation verification model for word and letter recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
37. PATTERSON, K., & MARCEL, A. J. (1977). Aphasia, dyslexia, and the phonological coding of written words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 307-312.
38. PERFETTI, C. A., & BELL, L. C. (1991). Phonemic activation during first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 473-485.
39. PERFETTI, C. A., BELL, L. C., & DELANEY, S. M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 59-70.
40. PERFETTI, C. A., & ZHANG, S. (1991). Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 633-643.
41. PERFETTI, C. A., & ZHANG, S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 24-33.
42. PLAUT, D. C., MCCLELLAND, J. L., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & PATTERSON, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
43. RUBENSTEIN, H., LEWIS, S. S., & RUBENSTEIN, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 10, 645-658.
44. RUMELHART, D. E., & SIPLE, P. (1974). Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychological Review, 81, 99-118.
45. SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1985). The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & E. M. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 199-252). New York: Academic Press.
46. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
47. SEIDENBERG, M. S., PETERSEN, A., MACDONALD, M. C., & PLAUT, D. C. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 48-62.
48. SMITH, F. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
49. STONE, G. O., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1248-1268.
50. TAFT, M. (1982). An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules? Memory & Cognition, 10, 465-474.
51. TAFT, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. TAN, L. H., HOOSAIN, R., & SIOK, W. W. T. (1996). The activation of early phonological codes before access to character meaning in written Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 865-882.
53. TREIMAN, R., FREYD, J. J., & BARON, J. (1983). Phonological mediation and use of spelling-sound rules in reading of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 682-700.
54. VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
55. VAN ORDEN, G. C., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
56. VAN ORDEN, G. C., JOHNSTON, J. C., & HALE, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 371-386.